1 / 16

Particle Measurement Programme Exploratory work & Validation Exercise (JRC)

Particle Measurement Programme Exploratory work & Validation Exercise (JRC) First Validation Exercise comparisons. B. Giechaskiel, G. Martini, J. Andersson JRC, 30 March 2009. Status Exploratory Work (JRC) Preconditioning Particles <23 nm Validation Exercise (JRC)

mcneilj
Download Presentation

Particle Measurement Programme Exploratory work & Validation Exercise (JRC)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Particle Measurement Programme Exploratory work & Validation Exercise (JRC) First Validation Exercise comparisons B. Giechaskiel, G. Martini, J. Andersson JRC, 30 March 2009

  2. Status Exploratory Work (JRC) Preconditioning Particles <23 nm Validation Exercise (JRC) Partial – Full flow systems comparison Number systems comparison After-treatment comparison Validation Exercise comparisons Outline

  3. Status

  4. Set up One Golden instrument at CVS and one at the partial flow system Alternative systems (EJ+ET+EJ+3010D, EJ+TD+3790, Nanomet-C) Other systems (EEPS, 3025A) TSI( 3025A)

  5. Preconditioning Non-volatile particles >23 nm Low temperature modes  Low emissions High temperature modes  High emissions Non-volatiles >23 nm 15 min at mode 10 is the minimum time for Pre-conditioning

  6. Pre-conditioning emissions High emissions of volatiles during passive regeneration Non-volatile emissions can be also observed Non-volatiles

  7. Cycles Low emissions at the rest cycles High emissions at the beginning of the cycle Hot WHTC Cold WHTC High emissions at high temperature modes ESC

  8. Particles <23 nm Total >3 nm approximately +80% of non-volatiles >23 nm Non-volatiles >3 nm approximately +40% of non-volatiles >23 nm

  9. Partial-Full flow systems Not good PM correlation between partial and full flow systems (However similar levels) Very good PN correlation between partial and full flow systems

  10. Number systems comparison Very good agreement between alternative and golden systems measuring from CVS in parallel

  11. Aftertreatment effect 65% reduction with partial flow Deep Bed Filter 99% reduction with wall flow filter EMITEC=PM Metalit Partial Flow Deep Bed Filter DPF=Pt based oxicat upstream of wall flow filter

  12. VE Comparisons - setup

  13. VE Comparisons - gaseous

  14. VE Comparisons – Real time PN

  15. VE Comparisons – PM and PN

  16. Exploratory Work (JRC) Preconditioning: Regeneration + Loading Not high concentration of particles <23 nm (and proportional) Validation Exercise (JRC) Good correlation between partial and full flow systems Good correlation between particle number systems Wall flow filters can reduce efficiently number emissions Validation Exercise comparisons Background important Quite good repeatability of PN emissions Conclusions

More Related