Intangible capital
This presentation is the property of its rightful owner.
Sponsored Links
1 / 22

Intangible Capital PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 58 Views
  • Uploaded on
  • Presentation posted in: General

Intangible Capital. Marianne Saam Centre for European Economic Research (ZEW) e-Frame Final Conference 10 February 2014 The e-Frame project is funded by the 7th EU Framework Programme, Theme 8 Socio-Economic Sciences and Humanities , Grant Agreement No . 290 520.

Download Presentation

Intangible Capital

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript


Intangible capital

Intangible Capital

Marianne Saam

Centrefor European Economic Research (ZEW)

e-Frame Final Conference

10 February 2014

The e-Frame projectisfundedbythe 7th EU Framework Programme, Theme 8 Socio-EconomicSciencesandHumanities, Grant Agreement No. 290 520.


Gdp and b eyond measurement policy use and moving forward

GDP andBeyond: Measurement, PolicyUseandMoving Forward

  • GDP iscurrentlyaugmentedby R&D investment

  • Beyondareotherintangibleassets not yetcapitalised in national accounts

  • Measurement remainschallenging, forexampleforserviceslives

  • PolicyUseismuchwanted (``smart growth‘‘) but forexampleindustry-level datais still experimental

  • Moving Forward? Yes, a lotisbeingdone out of FP7 projects, atthe OECD, at NSIs, in national and transnational initiatives….

e-Frame Final Conference


Agenda

Agenda

  • MeasuringIntangible Assets: Whatisitandwhomeasuresit?

  • The Corrado-Hulten-Sichel Framework

  • Integration into National Accounts

  • Firm-level Measurement

  • Policy-Relevant Use

  • Outlook

e-Frame Final Conference


1 what is i ntangible capital

1. WhatisIntangible Capital?

  • „Knowledge-basedassets (…) createfuturebenefitsforfirms, but, unlikemachines (…) theyare not physical.“ (OECD, 2013)

  • „Intangibleassetsare non-physicalsourcesofvalue (claimstofuturebenefits) generatedbyinnovation (discovery), uniqueorganizationaldesigns, or human resourcepractices“

    (Lev, 2001)

e-Frame Final Conference


1 who wants to measure intangible capital

1. Who WantstoMeasureIntangible Capital?

Statistical Agencies/Public Institutions

Academic ResearchersFirms

Policy

Financial markets

Perfor-

mance

Intangibles

Media, society

Tangibles

Labour

e-Frame Final Conference


2 the framework by corrado hulten and sichel

2. The Framework by Corrado, Hultenand Sichel

  • Corrado, Hultenand Sichel (2005, 2009 – CHS)

    • Framework tomeasureintangibleinvestment in a waycompatiblewith national accounts

    • ….andconsistentwiththeeconomictheoryofinvestment

  • Measurement offraction of an identifiable data series on intangible spending that is investment

    • Expenditure on own-accountorpurchasedknowledgeassets

    • Wagespaidforworking time spent on creationofknowledgeassets

e-Frame Final Conference


2 data using framework by corrado hulten and sichel

2. Data Using Framework by Corrado, Hultenand Sichel

  • INTAN-Invest database: Corrado, Haskel, Jona-Lasinio and Iommi (2012) published data on intangible investment of the market economy (plus sector O) for EU countries for the period 1995-2007

  • Freelyavailableatwww.intan-invest.net

  • Joint initiative ofthe FP7 SSH Projects COINVEST and INNODRIVE and The Conference Board, supportedbythe EC (2013)

  • First industry breakdown of INTAN-Investdata (NACE rev. 1.1) toindustry-level in FP7 SSH project INDICSER

  • INTAN-Investmeanwhileavailable in NACE rev.2

e-Frame Final Conference


2 chs country level results from intan invest

2. CHS: Country-levelResultsfrom INTAN-Invest

GDP shares of tangible vs. intangible investment, 1995–2009 (average values)

Source: Corrado et al. (2013), Oxford Review ofEconomicPolicy

e-Frame Final Conference


3 integration into national accounts

3. Integration into National Accounts?

  • Computer softwareanddatabases

  • Innovative property

    • R&D (incl. in financialindustry)newSNA 2008-ESA 2010

    • Mineral explorationsandevaluationFixed assetboundary

    • Entertainment, literaryandartisticoriginals

    • Design

  • Economiccompetencies

    • Brand equity (advertisingandmarketresearch)SNA 2008-ESA 2010

    • Organisational capitalNon-producedassets

    • Firm-specific human capital (training)(countediftransaction)

      Based on Iommi (2013), presentationat e-Frame workshop in intangibles

e-Frame Final Conference


3 integration into national accounts1

3. Integration into National Accounts?

  • Trade-off betweencompletenessandaccuracyofcoverageofintangibleassets

  • GDP hastobemeasurethatistrusted,comparableacross countries and time

    • Fromthisperspective, conservatismwithregardtochanging GDP seems an almostnecessaryvirtue

  • On theotherhand, in thelongterm GDP hastokeepupwithnewinsights in thequantificationofassets

  • „Knowledge economy“ evermoreimportant in policydebate

  • Intangibleassetscoretarget in EU 2020: 3% of GDP in R&D

  • The debateaboutexpandingtheassetboundaryshouldcontinue

e-Frame Final Conference


3 integration into national accounts comments from e frame workshop

3. Integration into National Accounts? Comments from e-Frame Workshop

  • Tooearlytoextendassetboundaryof NAs beyond R&D

  • Conditionsforpossibleextension in thefuture

    • Framework by CHS adaptedforpracticalimplementation at NSIs

    • Internationallycomparablesurveyspriorto potential implementation

    • More knowledgeaboutshort-run propertiesofintangibleinvestment

  • However, includingonly R&D maybiasmeasurementofintangiblestowardsmanufacturing

  • Mix ofsurveyingandmodellingmaybeneeded (burden on firms)

  • Treatment of human capital in national accounts also seenasneedingimprovement

e-Frame Final Conference


4 firm level measurement

4. Firm-level Measurement

  • ONS/NESTA surveycollectsinformationfrommorethan 1000 firms on expenditures on sixcategoriesofintangibleassetsand on servicelives (Field/Franklin 2012)

  • Goal:

    • Provideevidence on intangibleinvestmentbeyond R&D

    • Collectdata on own-account vs. purchasedintangibles

    • Complementothersurveys on intangibles

    • Find out whetherfirmscananswerquestionsaboutservicelivesofintangiblesandaboutownershipof R&D assets

  • Sample issmallcomparedtoother ONS surveys, R&D expenditurelookslowerthan in othersurveys

e-Frame Final Conference


4 firm level measurement1

4. Firm-level Measurement

  • Firmsthemselvesmayhave an interestorobligationtomeasureintangiblecapital(see Guenther, 2013, presentation at OECD)

    • Toassestheircontributionto firm performance

    • Tocomplytoaccountingrules

    • Tocommunicatetheirinvestmentstocapitalmarketsandpolicy

  • Critical pointsofaccountingforintangibles

    • Level offinancialinformation on intangibles in financialreportingislow

    • Large roomformanagerialdiscretion in thereporting on intangibles

    • Low voluntarydisclosureofinvestment in intangibles

    • Intangiblesdataare not usedmuch in managementcontrol, littlevalidation

      Source: Guenther (2013), presentation at OECD

e-Frame Final Conference


5 policy relevant use intangibles as part of gdp

5. Policy-Relevant Use: Intangiblesas Part of GDP

“In the short term America’s new GDP measure makes international comparisons more difficult.”

(Economist, 3.8.2013)

“R&D expenditure is recorded as GFCF and no longer as current expenditure. This will increase EU GDP by around 1.9%. (...) very important in the context of the Europe 2020 strategy.”

(European Commission, 16.1.14)

“GDP – New Statistics Let Debt Ratio Decline”

(FAZ, Germany, 21.1.14)

e-Frame Final Conference


5 policy relevant use intangibles as driver of gdp

5. Policy-Relevant Use: Intangiblesas Driver of GDP

Conclusionsfrom OECD project

  • Supply-sideprogramsshouldsupportintangibleinvestment in areasofhighestsocialreturn

  • Intellectualpropertyrightsneedfurtherdevelopment

  • Intangibleassetsare an importantfactor in global valuechain

  • Securitisationofdebtusingintangibleassetscouldbeimprovedtoaddressshortfallsofearly-stage riskcapital

  • Manyoftheworld‘smostsuccessfulcompanies‘ valueresidesalmostentirely in theirknowledge-basedassets, but corporatefinancialreportsprovide limited information

  • Policiesneedtoaddresstheeconomic potential of „bigdata“

e-Frame Final Conference


6 outlook

6. Outlook

  • Intangibleinvestment: bothtechnologicaland non-technologicalinnovation

  • Long-term:littlereason not toaccountforintangibleinvestment in GDP

  • Medium term:academicprojects, experimental surveysandsatelliteaccounts will moveagendaforward

  • Major measurementissues on servicelifes, ratesofreturnandsectoralheterogeneityare not solved

  • Common languagetobefoundbetweenacademics, publicinstitutions, statisticians at NSIs andfirms

  • Existingsurveys on innovationandtrainingwith a more „micro“ approachcontinuetobeimportantsourceofevidence

  • Data constructionforthepublicsectorhas just started (SPINTAN)

e-Frame Final Conference


Further reading

Further Reading

Corrado, C., J. Haskel, C. Jona-Lasinio, M. Iommi (2013), Innovation andintangibleinvestment in Europe, Japan andthe United States, Oxford Review ofEconomicPolicy, 29(2),261-268.

OECD (2013), New Sourcesof Growth: Knowledge-Based Capital – Key AnalysesandPolicyConclusions – Synthesis Report.

European Commission (2013), Joint database on intangiblesfor European policymaking - Data fromInnodrive, CoinvestandThe Conference Board – A policy-sciencedialogoe, DG for Research and Innovation – Socio-EconomicSciencesandHumanities.

e-Frame Final Conference


Back up i communicating intangibles to the public

Back up I: Communicatingintangiblestothepublic

Are wepersuadedthatintangibleassetsexist?

  • A machinemaybevaluable, obsolete orbroken, but I can in principledeterminebycommonlyagreedcriteriawhetheritexists

  • The existenceof a patent or a pieceofsoftwareis also quitestraightwardtocommunicate

  • Creatingassetsthroughtraining, consulting, marketingormanagerialeffortmaybemuchmorerisky

  • Society morescepticalaboutintangiblevaluecreation after financialcrisis

  • …maybe tooconventionalreasoning. Machines, softwareorpatentsmay also becountedwhile not contributingpositivelytoproductivity

e-Frame Final Conference


Back up ii asset list of intan invest

Back Up II: Asset List of INTAN-Invest

e-Frame Final Conference


Back up iii growth accounting

Back Up III: Growth Accounting

Contributions to the growth of output per hour, 1995–2007

Source: Corrado et al. (2013)

e-Frame Final Conference


Back up iv industry level results from indicser

Back Up IV: Industry-level Resultsfrom INDICSER

Share of F&E, design andeconomiccompetencies in adjusted VA

average 1995-2007, sourcedataused: EU KLEMS 2009, INTAN-Invest

Source: Niebel, O‘MahonyandSaam (2013)

e-Frame Final Conference


Back up v firm level measurement uk

Back Up V: Firm-level Measurement UK

Source: Field and Franklin (2012), presentedby Daniel Ker (ONS) at the e-Frame workshop on intangibles

e-Frame Final Conference


  • Login