1 / 28

Guidelines on Action for Children in the Justice system in Africa

Guidelines on Action for Children in the Justice system in Africa. Background. No dedicated African jurisprudence on children and justice systems Focus of major developments accross the continent – eg Kenya, South Africa, Ethiopia, Sierra Leone

mayda
Download Presentation

Guidelines on Action for Children in the Justice system in Africa

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Guidelines on Action for Children in the Justice system in Africa

  2. Background • No dedicated African jurisprudence on children and justice systems • Focus of major developments accross the continent – eg Kenya, South Africa, Ethiopia, Sierra Leone • Transitional justice processes have been underway since Truth Commission (South Africa), ICTR and ICSL, children to an extent affected/involved

  3. Background • Traditional justice systems officially or otherwise recognised throughout Africa • 2010 Council of Europe Guidelines on ‘child friendly justice’ • Differences: sharp division into ‘before, during and after’ • Recommendation by expert team to focus on guidelines for action: road map to govts

  4. Background • Request to ensure guidelines are ‘africanised’ • Hence recourse to 1999 African Commission’s ‘fair trial principles’ • Set high minimum standards and incorporate traditional justice systems ( 3 sections) • Are consistent with African Commission jurisprudence, eg communications

  5. Background • Second, refers to major AU and OAU documents (listed first, before UN docs) • Third, Preamble drafted to reflect African priorities, especially those reflected in the ACRWC (see par 4, p 3) • Fourth reflection of language of duties (for governments and on the part of children) • Question as to ‘designated’ vulnerable groups (par 5 p 4)

  6. Background • Fifth, respect for African family structures- see par 5 p 7; extended definition of ‘parent’ • Presented at Kampala • Feedback quite eclectic: largely not substantive, eg new content; some suggestions about blending some guidelines • Weight of focus remains scope, aims, general sections (ie 1st ones)

  7. Substance • A.Aims and Objectives • Intended to flag dynamism – not just set of principles but concrete guidance for law reform, co-ordination, technical assistance, AU oversight, media and the public • Affirms underlying 4 ‘pillars’ • Underscores multidisciplinary aproach,

  8. Substance • Specialisation in child rights and development, reduction of secondary victimisation, need to develop informal justice systems, need to strengthen systems ( systems approach); consideration of special needs (3 (k) p 6.

  9. B. Scope • All administrative and judicial procedures, formal and informal • Children in conflict, witnesses, victims, subjects of care proceedings, family law disputes, inheritance • All children below 18

  10. C. Definitions • Child • Child sensitive/friendly?? • Justice systems • Social workforce • Traditional courts • Restorative justice

  11. D.Overarching principles • Detail on participation – effective and meaningful (13) • Best interests – interpreted to a degree (14 • Non discrimination (NB for informal justice systems) • Dignity • Survival and development - includes the right to protection

  12. E. General Measures of Implementation • Birth registration systems; evidence of age • Legislative review (harmonisation) • National policy development and protocols to guide professionals, avoid delay, encourage specialisation • Information mangement and M and E systems • Allocation of resources, including donors and private sector

  13. General Measures (cont) • Diversion promoted • Alternative dispute resolution, mediation etc encouraged • Note role of social assistance programmes in reducing vulnerability

  14. F.Elements/characteristics • Access in own right to justice systems • Advice and information • Screening of social workforce staff for suitability whether paid or volunteers • Training of staff • Need for speedy conclusions, postponements kept to a minimum • Legal representation (progressive realisation)

  15. Elements/characteristics • Settings suitable to children; specialised courts; specialised procedures • Witness preparation schemes encouraged • Safety and dignity of migrant/displaced children

  16. G. Traditional Justice • Must respect international standards including:- • -equality, including gender quality • -Dignity (no corporal punishment, humiliation) • -no arbitrary arrest/detention • -opportunity to prepare case/present challenge

  17. Traditional Justice • -entitlement to interpreter, representative • -No undue delay • Right to appeal • Respect for privacy of the child, rights of parents/guardians/care-givers • Secret societies? • Binding on religious leaders and educators • Reference to HCP?

  18. H.Fair trial rights (children in conflict) • Sensitization training for law enforcement and justice officials • MACR (12) • Abolition of ‘status’ offences • Alternatives to prosecution elaborated, including Restorative Justice • Last resort and shortest time principle/separation etc • Transitional justice processes must enhance accountability

  19. I. Fair trial rights (victims and witnesses) • Presence of parents etc during questionning • No contact with perpetrator • Court preparation programmes • Privacy • Intermediaries where possible; video taped pre-recorded interviews; screens; • Judicial officers to wear ordinary dress

  20. Fair trial rights (victims and witnesses) • Previous sexual history evidence disallowed • No evidentiary exclusion purely on age • Court proceedings to be adapted to child’s pace and attention span • Protection from threats/intimidation • Information about possible redress • Risks of extra-judicial settlements

  21. Fair trial rights (victims and witnesses) • Legal provisions on child witness protection required • Interim measures and steps to remove perpetrators introduced • Communication of outcomes of justice proceedings to child victims and witnesses

  22. J. Civil, administrative, care and family law proceedings • Separate representation where conflict with care-givers • Right to be heard or not express opinion • Avoidance of intensification of conflict/further legal proceedings • Separation of siblings usually not in best interests • Promotion of family upbringing • Prevention of harm/exploitation

  23. J. Civil, administrative, care and family law proceedings After conflictual family proceedings, guidance support and counselling to be offered Judgements to be handed down speedily and implemented speedily ICA – last resort and in best interests. National legislation to domesticate Hague convention required

  24. J. Civil, administrative, care and family law proceedings • Alternative care systems to be established by law and monitored by governments • Orphaned children to be assured of the appointment of a legal guardian – laws required • Laws to ensure that children are not deprived of inheritance rights – girl child’s equal right to share in estates • Governments to adopt measures to support parents in their child rearing duties

  25. K. Monitoring and implementation • Governments to positively consider access requests • No immunity for torture – prosecutions required • Technical assistance to strengthen justice systems for children- note highlighted areas (par77 p 25) • Well trained social workforce

  26. K. Monitoring and implementation • In accordance with National Policy, a monitoring framework, including independent mechanisms, to be established to oversee implementation of the Guidelines • Civil society, IHR and relevant bodies to be involved • Monitoring process to highlight good and bad practices • Dissemination of child friendly version of Guidelines required

  27. Conclusions • Terminology (consensus needed) • Not a new treaty: clarity on intent • How much of the 1999 Fair trials rights principles to alter? Package deal? • How many vulnerable groups to refer to and when? Could go on and on? Preamble too – value added? • Whether to add – 80 guidelines already!

  28. Conclusions • How to deal with conflicting commentary? • How many more definitions required? • ------------------------0000--------------------------

More Related