Ding Yifan , Deputy Director, Institute of world development, Beijing Domestic debates on China’s opening to the world Presentation at the CERIUM’s Summer School China Risen How it changes and changes us. Origin of the opening policy
Ding Yifan, Deputy Director,
Institute of world development, Beijing
Domestic debates on China’s opening to the world
Presentation at the CERIUM’s Summer School
How it changes and changes us
Speeding up the development pace and catching up with developed world, reducing the gap between China and western world.
He’s determined to relaunch the processes interrupted by the cultural revolution, namely China’s modernization.
Opening policy was carried out as follows: buying foreign modern equipments, borrowing on the international market, development of tourisme in order to attract foreign visitors, and sending students abroad to learn modern technologies and skills of modern governance.
No debates on the opening policy per se.
Some phenomena unhappy to some Chinese old generation, and unseen in China before have been attributed to the opening.
Then Deng Xiaoping intervened, saying that, “when the windows and doors are open, flies and musquitous will come in with fresh air. We have to kill them and wipe them away.”
Hence the movement called “anti-spiritual pollution” in 1984-85, ...
There was another debate over the effects of opening policy to China’s economic development strategy.
In the 1980’s: import of a lot of manufacturing equipments of electronic devices, such as television sets, washing machines, refrigerators, etc... led to a fiace competition on the Chinese market.
Change of foreign investors in Chine : in an export driven growth model, accompanied by the attraction of FDI.
Chinese diaspora was the main source of FDI in China in the1980’s, and big multinational companies became main foreign investors in the 1990’s.
Foreign investors are changing their strategies in China : in an export driven growth model, accompanied by the attraction of FDI.
In the 1980’s, FDI focused on reducing labor cost and reexporting China manufactured goods towards the investor country or a third develped market.
In the 1990’s, many FDI are aimed at exploiting China’s domestic market as well.
Current debate over China’s opening policy comes from several leveals.
Ideological and political debate : socialism with Chinese characteristics means that the State should be the major actor in the economy. Opening policy sould be called into question, if it leads to privatization, so to the weakness of the State.
Technical debate: concerns about the possibility of seeing foreign firms control some key sectors of Chinese economy, as many Chinese provincial goverments are selling Chinese firms to foriengers. Risks of monopoly ou oligopolistic behavior.
Current orientation China, causing big inflationist pressure, risk of external shock to Chinese financial institutions... Focus on domestic development, government tries to implement a scientific concept of development ( aimed at developing Chinese own technologies, reducing pollution, raising energy use efficiency, etc). All this doesn’t mean a rejection of opening policy, but a correction of opening policy’s extent, due to resurging protectionism in many developed countries, and increasing macro-economic pressure.
But, it depends on the subtle game between Beijing and these provinces.