FRP: a tool for measuring and improving facility sustainability performance - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Frp a tool for measuring and improving facility sustainability performance
1 / 27

  • Uploaded on
  • Presentation posted in: General

FRP: a tool for measuring and improving facility sustainability performance. National Environmental Partnership Summit May 9, 2006 Beth Ginsberg, Ceres Topics. Ceres and the Facility Reporting Project (FRP) Overview of FRP Sustainability Reporting Guidance

I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.

Download Presentationdownload

FRP: a tool for measuring and improving facility sustainability performance

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript

Frp a tool for measuring and improving facility sustainability performance l.jpg

FRP: a tool for measuring and improving facility sustainability performance

National Environmental Partnership Summit

May 9, 2006

Beth Ginsberg, Ceres

Topics l.jpg


  • Ceres and the Facility Reporting Project (FRP)

  • Overview of FRP Sustainability Reporting Guidance

  • Facility Reporting Pilot Test

  • Partnerships with Government Agencies

What is ceres l.jpg

What is Ceres?

  • U.S. coalitionof influential environmental NGOs, labor, and investors (85 organizations)

  • A network of more than 70 corporations that have endorsed the Ceres Principles

  • The oldest (1989) and most trusted environmental code of conduct in U.S.

  • The convenor, with UNEP, of the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI)

Selected ceres companies l.jpg

American Airlines


Bank of America

Baxter International

Ben & Jerry’s Homemade


Consolidated Edison

Ford Motor Company

Selected Ceres Companies

  • General Motors

  • Interface

  • ITT Industries

  • Nike

  • Northeast Utilities

  • Saunders Hotel Group

  • Sunoco

  • YSI, Inc.

Ceres coalition selected members l.jpg


Citizens Funds

Connecticut State Treasurer’s Office

Domini Social Investments

Environmental Defense

Friends of the Earth

Interfaith Center on Corporate Responsibility

Ceres Coalition(selected members)

  • ISIS Asset Management

  • New York City Employee Retirement System

  • Sierra Club

  • Social Investment Forum

  • SustainAbility

  • Trillium Asset Management

  • Walden Asset Management

  • World Wildlife Fund U.S.

Ceres provides companies l.jpg

Ceres provides companies

  • Stakeholder feedback on environmental & sustainability reporting

  • Dialogues with key stakeholders on leading-edge sustainability issues

  • Recognition for leadership (Reporting Awards, Other communications)

  • Annual Conference –Education/ networking

Global reporting initiative l.jpg

Global Reporting Initiative

  • a multi-stakeholder process and independent institution

  • Sustainability Reporting Guidelines for voluntary reporting on the economic, environmental, and social dimensions of activities, products

  • 800+ companies reporting worldwide

  • GRI “G3” guidelines just released- refined indicators, reporting process and more tools, electronic report format

Why standardize reporting l.jpg

Why standardize reporting?

Companies receive diverse information requests

Stakeholders receive incomplete information

A generally-accepted reporting framework developed through a multi-stakeholder process

Source: GRI

What is the facility reporting project frp l.jpg

What is the Facility Reporting Project (FRP)?

The FRP is multi-stakeholder initiative to develop a generally-accepted, consistent, comparable and credible sustainabilityreporting framework.

The FRP’s main product is a standardized guidance for companies and other organizations to report on the environmental and social performance of manufacturing and other facilities.

Frp supports l.jpg

FRP Supports:

  • Public reporting and public trust

  • Performance-focused regulatory & voluntary approaches, including:

    • Performance Track programs

    • Environmental management systems

  • Facility awareness of external effects

  • Compatibility with Global Reporting Initiative

  • How frp came about growing sense of need in many places l.jpg

    How FRP Came About- Growing Sense of Need in Many Places

    • Discussions at Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) meetings about need for facility-level metrics

    • Multi State Working Group indicated need for credible and comparable facility-level performance metrics linked to EMS

    • Performance Track programs (federal and state) seeing need

    • Tellus and Ceres pursue funding

    Why report at the facility level l.jpg

    Why Report at the Facility Level?

    • Current public information on facility performance is fragmented, out of context

    • Need integration of data and “story”

    • Workers, communities, regulators, citizens seek accountability

    • Opportunity for more comprehensive reporting and community engagement

    • Opportunity for learning, performance and

      productivity gains

    • Interest in corporate benchmarking and best practices

    Frp guidance designed to be l.jpg

    FRP Guidance designed to be:

    • Voluntary

    • Initially US-focused

    • Compatible with GRI

    • Useful to public, private sector & govt.

    • Legitimized by multi-stakeholder formulation and feedback

    • Informed by best current knowledge and practice

    • A dynamic product that improves and evolves with experience

    6 key parts of the frp reporting guidance l.jpg

    6 key parts of the FRP Reporting Guidance

    • Reporting principles

    • How to prepare a report

    • Facility overview

    • Economic indicators

    • Environmental indicators

    • Social indicators

    Contents of the Facility Report

    Facility overview l.jpg

    Facility Overview

    • Facility Profile

    • Report Scope

    • Facility Organizational Context

    • Include stakeholders and how engaged

    Environmental indicators l.jpg

    Environmental Indicators

    • Materials

    • Energy

    • Water

    • Biodiversity/Land Use

    • Emissions, effluents, and waste

    • Transport

    • Community Impacts of odor, noise, dust, traffic, lighting, vibration

    Economic indicators l.jpg

    Economic Indicators

    Describe and quantify:

    • Customers

    • Suppliers

    • Employees

      • Payroll & Benefits

    • Providers of capital

    • Public sector

      • Subsidies, Taxes, Community donations

    • Infrastructure investments

    Social indicators l.jpg

    Social Indicators

    • Labor practices and decent work

    • Human rights

    • Society

    • Product responsibility

    Frp pilot test activities l.jpg

    FRP Pilot Test Activities

    • Suggested sustainability indicatorsfor reporting environmental, social and economic performance;

    • Guidanceto assist in the reporting process;

    • Complementary tools to aid stakeholder engagement and identification of performance indicators

    • Online resources for case studies and examples of data presentation

    Current frp participants l.jpg

    Current FRP Participants

    EPA working group

    • La-Z-Boy Utah

    • National Renewable Energy Laboratory

    • Infineon Technologies

    • Lockheed Martin

    • Louisiana Pacific

    • Delta Faucet

    Initial working group

    • Ford Motor Company

    • Timberland

    • Rockwell Collins

    • YSI, Inc.

    • New Hampshire Ball Bearings

    • Northside Foods

    • Harwood Products

    • Louisville & Jefferson MSD

    Frp pilot test timeline l.jpg

    FRP Pilot Test Timeline

    • Spring 2005: Launch at Ceres conference in Boston

    • Summer 2005: Pilot startup and group conference calls

    • Summer/ Fall 2005: Trainings at individual facilities, more company recruitment. 1st facility report published

    • Fall/ Winter 2006: Facilities collect data, engage stakeholders, draft reports; New state and government agency partnerships bring additional facilities on board

    • Spring/ Summer 2006: Reports begin to be published

    Pilot test participation benefits l.jpg

    Pilot Test Participation Benefits

    • Preparatory workshop, peer conference calls and support, website

    • On-site technical and reporting assistance

    • Assistance with stakeholder strategy, community and employee engagement

    • Access to best practices in facility accountability

    • Publicity for commitment and effort

    Government partnerships l.jpg

    Government partnerships

    • FRP can support performance-focused regulatory and voluntary programs

    • Can help government agencies looking to move corporate partners forward on sustainability

    • Current support from:

      • EPA National Center for Environmental Innovation (NCEI)

      • Washington Department of Ecology

      • Georgia P2AD program

    Looking for additional agency partners!

    Epa supports frp pilot test l.jpg

    EPA Supports FRP Pilot Test

    • EPA funds to support 7 Performance Track facilities piloting the environmental component of the FRP Guidance

    • Facilities will receive no-cost technical assistance to create comprehensive facility-level environmental reports

    • EPA will use lessons to explore relationship between environmental data collection, reporting, and performance improvement

    Washington ecology utilizes frp metrics l.jpg

    Washington Ecology utilizes FRP metrics

    Fall 2005: Launch of partnership with State of Washington Department of Ecology

    • Ecology putting together benchmark analysis of pulp and paper mills’ environmental impacts

    • Exploring opportunities to incorporate facility-level reporting and stakeholder engagement in future public engagement efforts.

    Georgia p2ad partnership l.jpg

    Georgia p2ad partnership

    Launch of partnership with State of Georgia P2AD program at MSWG meeting in September 2005

    • P2AD interested in convening regionally-focused pilot test working group

    • Multi-stakeholder process

    • Possible integration of facility-level reporting and accompanying metrics into performance-based program based on external feedback

    Questions discussion l.jpg

    Questions & discussion

    • About pilot test opportunities?

    • About state and other government partnerships?

      Contact Beth Ginsberg at Ceres to join:

      617-247-0700 x21 or

      For more information about the Facility Reporting Project visit: www

      Thank you!

  • Login