1 / 22

Development of an integrated database for the management of accidental spills (DIMAS)

VLIZ. Development of an integrated database for the management of accidental spills (DIMAS). Katrien Arijs Bram Versonnen Marnix Vangheluwe Jan Mees Ward Vandenberghe Daphne Cuvelier Bart Vanhoorne Colin Janssen An Ghekiere. Supported by the Federal Science Policy.

maxime
Download Presentation

Development of an integrated database for the management of accidental spills (DIMAS)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. VLIZ Development of an integrated database for the management of accidental spills (DIMAS) Katrien Arijs Bram Versonnen Marnix Vangheluwe Jan Mees Ward Vandenberghe Daphne Cuvelier Bart Vanhoorne Colin Janssen An Ghekiere Supported by the Federal Science Policy

  2. Overview DIMAS project • Background • Objectives • Phases • Selection of substances • Data collection • Evaluation & interpretation • Relational database • Data treatment & modelling

  3. Background • Accidents on sea • prompt reaction: importance of immediate and accurate information on environmental partitioning, bioavailability and (eco)toxicity • need for impact analysis tools • Currently: GESAMP, IMDG → limited use • data not specifically marine • long term effects? => expert judgement currently, slow reaction

  4. Objectives • Objective DIMAS: development of an easy to interpret, reliable, up-to-date database with data specifically for the marine environment • Involvement of different stakeholders → users committee • 4 phases: • Phase I: identification of compounds lists, transport data, criteria, 100 000 → 5 000 → 250 • Phase II: data collection phys-chem, ecotox (freshwater + marine), human • Phase III: evaluation and interpretation data quality, freshwater → marine • Phase IV: relational database, GUI and modelling reliable, simple, expandable, pictograms

  5. Selection substances (1) Tiered approach • Started with NSDB/IMDG/ESIS → IMDG, structure NSDB: 15,000 to 100,000 compounds • Selection 2,000-3,000 substances: • IMDG: P, PP, ● • COMMPS • Ecotox • Gesamp • Priority substances EU (ESIS) • … • Further selection: intrinsic properties, expert judgement, input users committee, TRANSPORT DATA (RAMA) • Validated against transport data from harbours

  6. Properties, expert judge-ment, transport, OSPAR dynamec, … Selection substances (2) Lists and databanks Involvement in spills COMMPS Dump sites Ecotox Gesamp bulk- packaged Annex I 67-548-EEC OSPAR Den Haag Helcom Priority EU UNECE POP ED North IMDG marine pollutants Selection of compounds Initial list (5,000 compounds) Final list (250 compounds) Website (www.vliz.be/projects/dimas/)

  7. Data gathering • Physico-chemical data • ECB-ESIS: • RAR European Commission • IUCLID Chemical Data sheet • NSDB • peer reviewed literature • Ecotoxicological data • ECB-ESIS (RAR) • US-EPA ECOTOX database (only peer reviewed data) • ED-North database & UGent ECOTOX database • peer reviewed literature • Human toxicological data • UGent ECOTOX database • ECB-ESIS

  8. Data gathering: ecotox NOT ENOUGH DATA!! • Water / sediment • Saltwater / freshwater • Acute / chronic toxicity • Different trophic levels: • fish • plants • algae • invertebrates • Different endpoints: • mortality • growth • reproduction • other • Data: few or none up to tens of papers E.g. cereals, cocos-oil (no data) ↔ anilin: • Water: > 60 acute, > 10 chronic • Sediment: some read across • micro-organisms • other

  9. Phase III-IV • Data evaluation: quality data ecotox: ‘data reliability & relevance’ • Detailed quality screening of marine data (high relevance) • Rough quality screening of freshwater data (lower relevance) → quality score depending on data source e.g. RAR: reliable, EPA: not fully verifiable • Database • Input/storage data • Lay-out database + output • ‘modelling’: environmental concentrations, effect concentrations

  10. Data treatment, ‘modelling’ • After data are entered in the database, exposure & effect modelling is carried out • Exposure: environmental partitioning modelling (Mackay) • estimate of compound concentration in different compartments after an accidental spill; • based on amount of compound spilled & physico-chemical properties; • can be automated (advantage when database is updated). • Effect: expressed as Potentially Affected Fraction (PAF) • estimate of % species that will be affected at a certain environmental concentration; • based on SSD (Species Sensitivity Distribution) approach with a log-logistic model fitted to the data; • can be calculated for acute and chronic data; • can be automated (advantage when database is updated); • easy to interpret.

  11. Exposure modelling (1) • Mackay level I: estimates the equilibrium partitioning of a quantity of organic chemical between the different compartments (marine-specific environment was used → no soil compartment) • Input: amount of compound spilled & physico-chemical parameters of the compound

  12. Exposure modelling (2) • Output: partitioning

  13. Effect modelling (1) • Gather + input all toxicity data • Assess quality (reliability and relevance) • Bring data to same level / units (e.g. LC50, NOEC) • Order data (LC50, NOEC) • Plot cumulative number of species (%) against endpoint (LC50, NOEC) • Fit curve (log-logistic) • Read % of species affected at given (estimated) water concentration after spill

  14. Microcystis Species Sensitivity Distribution (SSD) 100% 80% 60% Cumulative probability 40% 20% 0% 10 100 1000 10000 100000 Daphnia m Concentration ( g/l) Pimephales Effect modelling (2) Concentration 1 mg/L PAF 23%

  15. Example: acute effects acetonitrile Low risk (< 5% PAF): < 1,500 mg/L Attention (5-25% PAF): 1,500-3,000 mg/L Major risk (> 25% PAF): > 3,000 mg/L

  16. Conclusion • Integrated and multi-disciplinary database embedded in a fully web-enabled searching graphical user interface: http://www.vliz.be/projects/dimas/ • This tool will increase transparency and allow for rapid communication in case of an accidental spill • First beneficiaries: people directly involved in the first phase of a contingency plan • Final indirect beneficiaries: general public, who will be better informed and ultimately better protected

  17. VLIZ EURAS VLIZ LETAE Rijvisschestraat 118, Box 3, 9052 Gent, Belgium Pakhuizen 45-52 8400 Oostende, Belgium J. Plateaustraat 22 9000 Gent, Belgium  Tel.: +32 (9) 257 13 99 Tel.: +32 (59) 34 21 30 Tel.: +32 (9) 264 37 75 ( Fax: +32 (9) 257 13 98 Fax: +32 (59) 34 21 31 Fax: +32 (9) 264 37 66 bram.versonnen@euras.be www.euras.be info@vliz.be www.vliz.be Colin.janssen@ugent.be www.milieutox.ugent.be : http://www.vliz.be/projects/dimas

More Related