1 / 49

Let’s Really Implement Antimicrobial Stewardship

Let’s Really Implement Antimicrobial Stewardship. Chris Gentry, Pharm.D ., BCPS Clinical Coordinator and Clinical Specialist, Infectious Diseases Oklahoma City VA Medical Center. Unintended consequences. Pt seen for approval of piperacillin / tazobactam , linezolid , daptomycin .

maura
Download Presentation

Let’s Really Implement Antimicrobial Stewardship

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Let’s Really Implement Antimicrobial Stewardship Chris Gentry, Pharm.D., BCPS Clinical Coordinator and Clinical Specialist, Infectious Diseases Oklahoma City VA Medical Center

  2. Unintended consequences • Pt seen for approval of piperacillin/tazobactam, linezolid, daptomycin. • 79 yo MALE w/ h/o CKD, CHF, DM originally transferred from outside hospital 12/31 with ARF, new onset A.fib, and right pleural effusion. • Hospital course complicated by development of HCAP, HIT, NSTEMI, solar keratosis with hemorrhage. • HCAP treated empirically with pip/tazo 1/12-1/22; no opportunity to de-escalate due to lack of microbial etiology necessitating broad-spectrum therapy

  3. Unintended consequences • Transferred to MICU 1/29 for altered mental status, GPC bacteremia & presumed nosocomial pneumonia. • Pip/tazo and ciprofloxacin added to vancomycin. • Trach aspirate and BAL culture grew a pip/tazo-resistant Enterobacter cloacae. • Patient's GPC bacteremia was found to be vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium. • Vancomycin changed to daptomycin & linezolid for Gram positive bacteremia & pneumonia. • Patient also has purulent UA with culture growing Candida albicans.

  4. Unintended consequences • Recommended dc pip/tazo since E. cloacae was pip/tazo-resistant. Given good MIC of the E. cloacae to ciprofloxacin, treated with ciprofloxacin monotherapy, increasing dose to 400 mg IV q12hr. • Recommended treating VRE bacteremia with either linezolid or daptomycin, but not both. In this circumstance either was appropriate but linezolid has confirmed activity against this isolate. • Recommended starting fluconazole for Candida albicans in urine.

  5. Effect of broad-spectrum antibiotics on microbial ecosystems Green = susceptible/nice Red = resistant/mean ABX

  6. Effect of narrow-spectrum antibiotics on microbial ecosystems Light Green = susceptible/nice Dark Green = resistant/nice Red = resistant/mean ABX

  7. Inactive pipeline

  8. Lack of unique classes From: Extendingthecure.org, RW Johnson Foundation, 2007

  9. Gram negative antibiotic pipeline

  10. Gram negative antibiotic pipeline • Nada

  11. Gram negative antibiotic pipeline • Nada • Nothing

  12. Gram negative antibiotic pipeline • Nada • Nothing • Zilch

  13. Gram negative antibiotic pipeline • Nada • Nothing • Zilch • Non-existent

  14. Why Antimicrobial Stewardship ? • Resistant organisms lead to poorer outcomes in efficacy: • Vancomycin-resistant enterococci • Glycopeptide intermediate or resistant Staphylococcus aureus • Penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae • Extended-spectrum beta-lactamase producing Klebsiellapneumoniaeand E. Coli • Multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter sp and Pseudomonas aeruginosa • Candidemia

  15. Why Antimicrobial Stewardship ? • Resistant organisms lead to poorer outcomes in safety, leading to ↑ use of: • Aminoglycosides • Carbapenems • Colistin • Linezolid • Voriconazole • Amphotericin

  16. Why Antimicrobial Stewardship ? • Resistant organisms lead to increased lengths of stay

  17. Why Antimicrobial Stewardship ? • Resistant organisms lead to more broad-spectrum antibiotic use • Which, in turn, leads to more resistant organisms

  18. Multi-drug resistant Gram negative infections • ESBL-producing Klebsiella sp. and E Coli • Acinetobacter sp. and Pseudomonas sp. • Cases being seen that are PAN-resistant • Necessitating the rapid increase in use of carbapenems, tigecycline, and colistin

  19. ICU Gram negative bacilli bloodstream infections Wisplinghoff H, et al. Clin Infect Dis 2004;39:309-317

  20. 2009 ICU Gram negative bacilli susceptibilities Bertrand, Dowzicky. ClinTher 2012;34:124-137

  21. Extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)

  22. ESBL-producing K. pneumoniaeand E. ColiSusceptibility & Resistance Characteristics • Resistant to: • All penicillins • Questionable activity for piperacillin/tazobactam • First, second and third generation cephalosporins • Questionable activity for cefepime • Aztreonam • Fluoroquinolones • Susceptibility rates of ~25% • TMP-sulfamethoxazole • Aminoglycosides • Tobramycin and amikacin can be susceptible

  23. ESBL-producing K. pneumoniaeand E. ColiSusceptibility & Resistance Characteristics • Susceptible to: • Carbapenems • Some level of concern for ertapenem • Tigecycline • Colistin

  24. ESBL incidence • Klebsiella sp. ESBL rates increased from ~10% in 2003 to ~15% thru 2008. • E.coli ESBL rates increased from ~3% in 2003 to 7% thru 2008 • Proteus mirabilus ESBL rates have been ~4%. Castanheira M, et al. American Society for Microbiology General Meeting. May 2010. San Diego, CA

  25. Klebsiellapneumoniaecarbapenemase (KPC)

  26. KPCsSusceptibility & Resistance Characteristics • Resistant to: • Penicillins • Cephalosporins • Aztreonam • Carbapenems • Usually • Carbapenemase activity may not provide resistance if other mechanisms are not present • Fluoroquinolones • Usually

  27. KPCsSusceptibility & Resistance Characteristics • Susceptible to: • Tigecycline • Colistin • Aminoglycosides

  28. MDR P. aeruginosa, Acinetobacter sp., and other non-fermenters

  29. MDR P. aeruginosa, Acinetobacter sp., and other non-fermenters • Susceptible to: • Colistin • Use with an anti-pseudomonalcarbapenem or rifampin may produce synergistic killing and reduce emergence of colistin resistance • Amikacin • Acinetobacter sp. may be susceptible to: • Ampicillin-sulbactam • Minocycline • Tigecycline

  30. Colistin and Tigecycline

  31. ColistinBack to the Future • Polymixin E • look at your triple antibiotic ointment tube • 2.5-5 mg/kg/day, divided into 2 or 3 doses • Revived due to ICU outbreaks of multidrug resistant P. aeruginosa and Acinetobacter sp. infections • Should use in combination with carbapenem or rifampin to minimize emergence of colistin resistance • Nephrotoxicity in ~20-30% • Neurotoxicity (NMB) in ~10%

  32. Tigecycline • New class: Glycylcycline • similar to tetracyclines without similar resistance • Very unique – good AND bad - microbiologic profile • Gram negative bacilli EXCEPT for: • Pseudomonas aeruginosa • Proteus mirabilus • Providencia sp. • Serratiamarcescens • Gram positive cocci INCLUDING: • MRSA • VRE • MDRStreptococcus pneumoniae • Anaerobic activity

  33. Tigecycline • 100 mg IV load, then 50 mg IV q12h • Very low serum concentrations • Limits role in serious infections (along with being bacteristatic) • Reasonable volume of distribution • Primarily biliary excreted • Limits role in UTI’s • High rate of nausea (20-30%) and vomiting (10%) • Limited primarily to first couple of days

  34. IDSA/SHEA Guidelines: Executive Summary 1. Core members of a multidisciplinary antimicrobial stewardship team include an infectious diseases physician and a clinical pharmacist with infectious diseases training (A-II) who should be compensated for their time (A-III), with the inclusion of..... Because antimicrobial stewardship, an important component of patient safety, is considered to be a medical staff function, the program is usually directed by an infectious diseases physician or codirected by an infectious diseases physician and a clinical pharmacist with infectious diseases training (A-III).

  35. IDSA/SHEA Guidelines: Executive Summary 2. Collaboration between the antimicrobial stewardship team and the hospital infection control and pharmacy and therapeutics committees or their equivalents is essential (A-III). 4. The infectious diseases physician and the head of pharmacy, as appropriate, should negotiate with hospital administration to obtain adequate authority, compensation, and expected outcomes for the program (A-III).

  36. Antimicrobial Stewardship Program: Personnel ID MD Epi ID PharmD ASP IT ICP Micro

  37. Pharmacist level of impact ID-TRAINED Resistance & Case-specific expertise GENERAL CLINICAL Clinical practice guidelines STAFF Education IV to PO Renal dosing

  38. Stewardship Strategies – Restriction enforcement model • Prospective audit • Maintains prescriber autonomy • Avoids potential delays in timely therapy • Recommendations may be optional • By drug, by culture, by disease state • Preauthorization • Use of “experts” at outset of therapy • May delay initiation of therapy • 24/7/365 • unless exceptions for after-hours are in place (ie, first dose sent)

  39. Stewardship Strategies, cont’d. • Education • Not very effective when used alone • IV to PO • Traditionally big bang-for-the-buck intervention, but physicians are doing this better on their own. • Clinical practice guidelines • Development • Dissemination • Enforcement • Updating • Antimicrobial order forms • Good for initial empiric therapy, but then what?

  40. Stewardship Strategies, cont’d. • De-escalation • Most effective with good quality, positive cultures • What about empiric therapy? • What if there are no culture data? • Dose optimization • Optimizes outcomes? • Doesn’t alter broad-spectrum activity • Antimicrobial cycling • Largely dismissed now, no real effect on resistance

  41. Anti-infective spectrum funnel Gram positive Gram positive/ Gram negative Fungal Meropenem, Imipenem & Doripenem Piperacillin/tazobactam Cefepime & Ceftazidime Fluoroquinolones Ertapenem Ceftriaxone Amp/sulbactam Cefoxitin Cefazolin Ampicillin Daptomycin Linezolid Telavancin Quinopristin/ Dalfopristin Vancomycin Cefazolin Nafcillin Penicillin Amphotericin Voriconazole Posaconazole Echinocandins Itraconazole Fluconazole NONE

  42. Types of interventions Trade one broad-spectrum regimen for another Narrow the spectrum based on culture and susceptibility results Patients doing well; change to po and/or discharge Patient cured; discontinue therapy

  43. Antibiotic outcome timeline

  44. Conclusions • MDR bacteria threaten our ability to treat outpatient infections with oral antibiotics and our ability to treat inpatient infections with intravenous antibiotics • Totality of evidence points only to increasing trends in the prevalence of MDR bacteria with current practices

  45. Conclusions, cont’d • The antibiotics we are forced to use to treat MDR bacterial infections are: • limited in number • potentially less effective • generally less safe • generally more broad-spectrum (feeds vicious cycle) • The antibiotic pipeline looks dismal for the foreseeable future • Efforts need to focus on preventing infections and maximizing the durability of available treatment options with antimicrobial stewardship.

More Related