1 / 10

Overview + Charge to L2s

Overview + Charge to L2s. UCSD October 17, 2019. IPO. IPO Elaboration. DM Example. Charge to L2s – Assurance of Project Delivery. Level 2 Leads are leading and managing major projects Scientific/Technical leadership and connection to the collaboration Project management and engineering

matthewpeterson
Download Presentation

Overview + Charge to L2s

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Overview + Charge to L2s UCSD October 17, 2019

  2. IPO

  3. IPO Elaboration DM Example

  4. Charge to L2s – Assurance of Project Delivery • Level 2 Leads are leading and managing major projects • Scientific/Technical leadership and connection to the collaboration • Project management and engineering • All L2’s are jointly responsible to prioritize on the overall CMB-S4 project • Engage in project wide project management, systems engineering, and risk tools and results • Organize to deliver your project • Level 3, 4, 5 scope breakdown, deliverables • Organization chart capturing the people and institutions needed for project delivery – you probably do not fully appreciate all the help (people and resources) you will need to succeed • Prepare technical decisions in a manner that engenders support

  5. Technical Baseline Development (TBD) Group • Charged to helping the project stay on a technical path to a timely CD-1 • Ensuring the technical decision-making process is reasonable, effective, and stays on track • Ensuring R&D resources are focused in the most critical places • Ensuring that the various parts of the project (L2 areas) are fitting together well, no cracks, miscommunications, etc.

  6. Status of Cost & Schedule Updates • Brenna Flaugher & Kathy Bailey met with L2 managers at least once, reviewed current status of cost and schedule • Awaiting feedback and updates in most areas and planning to followup with L2s during this meeting • 20 October - deadline for input prior to the November review • 21-25 October - Brenna/Kathy will integrate and update critical path, costs and schedule and iterate with L2s as necessary • 25 October – Kathy Bailey provides L2 slides on cost and schedule to L2 Leads for incorporation into their Annual Review presentations

  7. Integrated Project Office (IPO) Goals • Engage collaboration and large project expertise in project planning • Define a preliminary project execution organization and governance structure • Establish a Baseline Design for the experiment (DSR = Reference Design) in support of the NSF Preliminary Design (PD) and DOE CD-1 • Prepare cost and schedule estimates, risk assessment, and identify near term schedule critical activities and decisions • Pursue and prepare private and international partnerships for in-kind contributions to the experiment • Encourage alignment of people/institutions in the delivery of project scope • Prepare ad hoc reviews and assessments • Coordinate interactions with the funding agencies Prepare for NSF PD and DOE CD-1 review(s) in 2021! 

  8. Annual Review – Nov 4-5 • Evaluate the CMB-S4 Preliminary Project Execution Plans • ….. • Evaluate the Near-Term Timeline to DOE CD-1/3a and NSF PD • ….. • Summary Evaluation • What are the most significant vulnerabilities in being prepared for the NSF Preliminary Design and DOE CD-1 reviews on the timeline proposed?

  9. Annual Review Charge – (1) • Evaluate the CMB-S4 Preliminary Project Execution Plans • Assess the preliminary project execution plans including the effectiveness of the organization and project management structure for this stage of the project. • Is the DOE/NSF preliminary scope of work reasonable for this stage of the project? • Is the notional project schedule including milestones and integration reasonable for this stage of the project? • Are the cost estimates and initial contingency assessment reasonable for this stage of the project? • Have the high level risks been identified in order to support the R&D effort? Assess the risk registry including proposed risk consequences and mitigation plans. • Recommend specific improvements to the preliminary project execution plans.

  10. Annual Review Charge – (2) • Evaluate the Near-Term Timeline to DOE CD-1/3a and NSF PD • Assess the plan for preparing a DOE Conceptual Design Report (CDR) and an NSF Preliminary Design Report (PDR) = Baseline Design Document • Assess the status of the project planning documentation required for DOE CD-1 and an NSF PD. • Evaluate the case for proposed Critical Decision 3a items. • Recommend actions that can be taken to improve the near-term plans • Summary Evaluation • What are the most significant vulnerabilities in being prepared for the DOE CD-1 and NSF PD review(s) on the timeline proposed?

More Related