Disaster risks and capacities in central asia
This presentation is the property of its rightful owner.
Sponsored Links
1 / 13

Disaster Risks and Capacities in Central Asia PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 57 Views
  • Uploaded on
  • Presentation posted in: General

Disaster Risks and Capacities in Central Asia. Michael Thurman Regional Disaster Risk Reduction Advisor, ECIS "Improving Regional Coordination in Managing Compound Risks in Central Asia“ 14-15 April 2011. Contents. Risk = hazard exposure x vulnerability

Download Presentation

Disaster Risks and Capacities in Central Asia

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript


Disaster risks and capacities in central asia

Disaster Risks and Capacities in Central Asia

Michael Thurman

Regional Disaster Risk Reduction Advisor, ECIS

"Improving Regional Coordination in Managing Compound Risks in Central Asia“ 14-15 April 2011


Contents

Contents

  • Risk = hazard exposure x vulnerability

  • Capacity Averages (from CACDRR Capacity Assessment)

  • Capacity Gaps and capacity Development Priorities (from Group Work for HFA 1, 3, and 4)


Geophysical hazards

Geophysical Hazards

  • All major cities are highly exposed and contain a high concentration of population and economic activity.

  • Secondary effects include landslides, mudflows, and GLOFs. Not enough is known concerning the triggering effect.

  • Landslides triggered by geological, seismic, and meteorological processes

  • Landslides will become more frequent and intensify with climate change.

  • Transboundary hazards in Ferghana Valley and northern Tien Shan.


Meteorological hazards

Meteorological Hazards

  • 1991-2007: hydrological variability increased.

  • Downstream exposure to floods and hydrological drought often due to poor management at all levels.

  • Ferghana Valley and upper Amu Darya basin highly exposed to transboundary mudflow and GLOF hazards.

  • GLOFs are a growing concern, due to glacier melt.

  • Climate change will amplify exposure to all meteorological hazards.


Compound hazards

Compound Hazards

  • Hydrological drought and extreme cold:

    • “Compound crisis” of 2007-08: natural and man-made factors contributed to exposure

    • Climate change expected to result in warmer winters, but hydrological drought more severe

  • Technogenic hazards: Mayli Suu and other toxic waste particularly a concern in the Ferghana Valley


Economic vulnerability

Economic Vulnerability

  • Lack of adequate data, due to collection and analysis procedures for global and national datasets.

  • Potential for losses as % of GDP highest for Tajikistan and Kyrgyzstan.

  • Absolute amount of potential losses for other countries are higher.

  • Vulnerable to meteorological hazards: weather-dependent sectors account for 40-60% of GDP.


Structural vulnerability

Structural Vulnerability

  • Intense earthquake in a major city in Central Asia would collapse or severely damage around half of the residential building stock.

  • Water infrastructure deteriorated and vulnerable to flood hazards

  • Outdated building codes and lax enforcement attenuate structural vulnerability


Socioeconomic vulnerabilities

Socioeconomic Vulnerabilities

  • Poverty, income disparities, and social status significantly lower resilience.

  • Poor municipal and land use planning place populations, infrastructure, and livelihoods in the way of hazards.

  • Unsustainable operations and maintenance of infrastructure, especially for water, increases both exposure and vulnerability.

  • Agriculture requires development to lower vulnerability to drought and floods.

  • Environmental degradation contributes to exposure and vulnerability.


Cacdrrr capacity assessment averages

CACDRRR Capacity Assessment Averages

  • Capacity indicators per priority areas of the Hyogo Framework for Action

  • Assessment of the existing capacity level 1 …… 5

  • Desired capacity level/priority (low, medium, high)


Capacity gaps and priorities group work for hfa 1

Capacity Gaps and Priorities: Group Work for HFA 1

Ensuring Commitment, Enabling Environment and Institutional Development


Capacity gaps and priorities group work for hfa 3

Capacity Gaps and Priorities: Group Work for HFA 3

Public Awareness and Education


Capacity gaps and priorities group work for hfa 4

Capacity Gaps and Priorities: Group Work for HFA 4

Disaster Prevention and Mitigation


Disaster risks and capacities in central asia

THANK YOU!


  • Login