Martyn Hammersley The Open University NCRM Research Methods Festival, St Catherine’s College, Oxford, July 2012. What is Analytic Induction?. Why should we be interested in analytic induction?. It has historical significance: it was closely associated with the Chicago School of Sociology.
The Open University
NCRM Research Methods Festival,
St Catherine’s College, Oxford, July 2012
More recent examples that appeal to this approach include: Bloor 1978; Katz 2001a; Gilgun 1995, and Rettig et al 1996.
Cressey (1953) started by studying people who had been convicted of embezzlement and equivalent offences, looking for factors they shared in common. From this he developed a hypothesis, but deviant cases were found so that he had to revise it. At one point he reformulated the type of case he was trying to explain, excluding those people who had taken on positions of financial trust specifically to steal money, focusing solely on those already in positions of financial trust who had subsequently decided to ‘borrow’ money.
The curious co-existence of AI and GT in the development of Chicago Sociology (see Hammersley 2010a).
‘Analytic induction is unlike other qualitative approaches since it begins with a pre-existing theoretical viewpoint or premise that guides the investigator’s approach to the cases that are examined (Gilgun, 1995; Miller,1982)’ (Rettig et al 1997:208).
If not, it can only discover necessary conditions, at best.
AI relies upon a very strong interpretation of causation, in which a cause = a set of necessary and jointly sufficient conditions that must be met for some outcome to occur.
We need to consider whether this is appropriate.
Presence of flammable materials
Becker, H. S. (1998) Tricks of the Trade, Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
Bloor, M. (1978) ‘On the analysis of observational data: A discussion of the worth and uses of inductive techniques and respondent validation’, Sociology, 12, 3, pp545-52.
Bloor, M. and Wood, F. (eds.) Keywords in Qualitative Methods, London, Sage.
Bogdan, R. and Biklen, S. (1992) Qualitative Research for Education, 2nd ed. Boston MS, Allyn and Bacon.
Cooper, B. et al (2012) Challenging the Qualitative-Quantitative Divide, London, Continuum, Ch.5.
Cressey, D. (1953) Other People’s Money, Glencoe ILL, Free Press.
Denzin, N. (2006) ‘Analytic induction’, in Ritzer, G. (ed.) Blackwell Encyclopedia of Sociology, Oxford Blackwell.
Gilgun, J. (1995) ‘We shared something special’, Journal of Marriage and Family, 57, pp265-81.
Gilgun, J. (1992) Qualitative Methods in Family Research, Thousand Oaks, Sage. (see pp22-40)
Goldenberg, S. (1993) ‘Analytic induction revisited’, Canadian Journal of Sociology, 18, 2, pp161-76
Hague, B. (2008) ‘Précis of “An abductive theory of scientific method”’, Journal of Clinical Psychology, 64, 9, pp1019-22.
Hammersley, M. (1989) The Dilemma of Qualitative Method, London, Routledge.
Hammersley, M. (2008) Questioning Qualitative Inquiry, London, Sage.
Hammersley, M. (2010a) ‘A historical and comparative note on the relationship between analytic induction and grounded theorising’, Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 11(2), 2010, Art. 4, Available at: http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs100243
Hammersley, M. (2010b) ‘Aristotelian or Galileian? On a Puzzle about the Philosophical Sources of Analytic Induction’, Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 40, 4, pp393-409.
Hammersley, M. (2011) ‘On Becker’s studies of marihuana use as an example of analytic induction’, Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 41, 4, pp535 – 566.
Johnson, P. (1998) ‘Analytic induction’, in Symon, G. and Cassell, C. (eds.) Qualitative Methods and Analysis in Organizational Research, London, Sage.
Katz, J. (2001a) ‘Analytic induction revisited’, in Emerson, R. (ed.) Contemporary Field Research, Second edition, Prospects Heights ILL, Waveland Press.
Katz, J. (2001b) ‘Analytic induction’ in N. J. Smelser and P. B. Baltes (eds.)International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences, Oxford, Elsevier
Lindesmith, A. (1968) Addiction and Opiates, Chicago, Aldine.
Lindesmith, A. ‘Symbolic interactionism and causality’, Symbolic Interaction, 4, 1, pp87-96.
Manning, P. (1982) ‘Analytic induction’, in Smith, R., Manning, P. (eds.) Handbook of Social Science Methods: Qualitative Methods, Cambridge MS, Ballinger.
Miller, S. (1982) ‘Quality and quantity: Another view of analytic induction’, Quality and Quantity, 16, 4, pp281-95.
Pascale, C-M (2010) Cartographies of Knowledge, Thousand Oaks CA, Sage.
Patton, M. Q. (2002) Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods, 3rd edition, Thousand Oaks CA, Sage.
Ragin, C. (1994) Constructing Social Research, Pine Forge Press.
Ratcliff, D. ‘Analytic induction as a qualitative research method of analysis’. Available at (accessed 1.5.12): http://www.mieonline.org/home/articles/23/1/Analytic-Induction-as-a-Qualitative-Research-Method-of-Analysis--Donald-E-Ratcliff/Page1.html
Rettig, K., Tam, V. and Magistad, B. (1997) ‘Using pattern matching and modified analytic induction in examining justice principles in child support guidelines’, Marriage and Family Review, 24, 1/2, pp193-22:
Robinson, W. S. (1951) ‘The logical structure of analytic induction’, American Sociological Review, 16, 6, pp812-818.
Turner, R. (1953) ‘The quest for universals’, American Sociological Review, 18, 6, pp604-11.
Znaniecki, F. (1934) The Method of Sociology, New York, Farrar and Rinehart