html5-img
1 / 25

LL202 Commercial Contracts

LL202 Commercial Contracts. Chris von Csefalvay. Agenda for today . Session 1: Introduction & Freedom of Contract Introductions Recap of lecture Fairness in contract Formation of contracts in English law. Agenda for today . Session 2: Terms & interpretation Recap of lecture

mateo
Download Presentation

LL202 Commercial Contracts

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. LL202 Commercial Contracts Chris von Csefalvay

  2. Agenda for today • Session 1: Introduction & Freedom of Contract • Introductions • Recap of lecture • Fairness in contract • Formation of contracts in English law

  3. Agenda for today • Session 2: Terms & interpretation • Recap of lecture • Express terms • Implied terms • Interpretation

  4. Me • Chris von Csefalvay ([CHAY-fahl-wah-yee]) • BA (Oxon), BCL (Oxon), practising lawyer • Collects old legal documents and stock certificates. • Born in Hungary, grew up all over Europe.

  5. You • Your name • 1 sentence (strictly!) about your background in law • 1 interesting fact about you • 1 interesting fact about the place you come from

  6. Recap of lecture #1: Tell me one thing you remember from the lecture. #2: Tell me one thing you did not understand at the lecture.

  7. Fairness and freedom of contract

  8. Example: Union Eagle • Union Eagle v Golden Achievement Ltd [1997] 2 All ER 215 (PC) • How would you have decided? Why? • Is fairness a beguiling heresy? • Is it a heresy? • Is it beguiling?

  9. External restrictions • Competition law • Anti-competitive agreements are void. • Insolvency law • Anti-deprivation principle

  10. Formation of contracts Meeting of minds (consensus ad idem) Pre-contractual phase Contractual phase

  11. Classroom discussion of questions • Please discuss each question in your group for three minutes. • Please present your findings.

  12. End of session 1 • 10’ break before session 2.

  13. Agenda for today • Session 2: Terms & interpretation • Recap of lecture • Express terms • Implied terms • Interpretation

  14. Recap of lecture #1: Tell me one thing you remember from the lecture. #2: Tell me one thing you did not understand at the lecture.

  15. Terms of a contract • Terms are a description of the obligations assumed in the contract. • They are to be distinguished from • representations (more about them later); and • ‘mere puffs’.

  16. Express terms • Per Blackburn J in Smith v Hughes (1871) LR 6 QB 597, the objective approach: “If, whatever a man’s real intention may be, he so conducts himself that a reasonable man would believe that he was assenting … and that other party upon that belief enters into the contract with him”, he is bound.

  17. Standard forms

  18. Forgetting the form… • At least in commercial contracts, where the seller fails to use their standard form, the terms thereof may nonetheless be incorporated, by… • course of dealing: The Hardwicke Game Farm Case, Kendall v Lillico[1969] 2 AC 31; • standard terms of trade: British Crane Hire v Ipswich Plant Hire Ltd [1974] 1 All ER 1059

  19. Implied terms

  20. Statutory implication • Significantly more numerous source than common law implication. • Example: s14(2) Sale of Goods Act 1979 Where the seller sells goods in the course of a business, there is an implied term that the goods supplied under the contract are of satisfactory quality.

  21. Primacy of express terms • In general, implied terms cannot override express terms. • Exception: ‘mandatory terms’ – e.g. competition law, terms that cannot be excluded due to UCTA 1977,…

  22. Contractual interpretation • Three approaches: • Looking for intention • Looking to give effect to literal meaning • Looking to give effect to the agreement as the reasonable person would have seen it.

  23. Lord Hoffmann’s 5 principles (from Investors compensation Scheme v W Bromwich BS [1998] 1 All ER 98 (HL)): • Interpretation is ascertaining what the document would mean to the reasonable person having all the information the parties had at the time of the contract. • The background/matrix of fact includes anything that would affect the way the document would be understood by the reasonable person. • Previous negotiations of the parties and subjective declarations are excluded. • The meaning of the document to the reasonable man is not necessarily its literal meaning. • Judges should only conclude that parties have made a linguistic mistake if the meaning of their words flouts common sense or suggests an intent to the parties they plainly could not have had.

  24. Classroom discussion of questions • Please discuss each question in your group for three minutes. • Please present your findings.

  25. End of session 2 See you tomorrow morning in the same place. – Please do the recommended readings and think about the questions.

More Related