Special requirements for Photosources operating at PV electron scattering exp. . International Workshop PAVI 2006 Milos Island 20/05/2006 by Kurt Aulenbacher Institut für Kernphysik der Uni Mainz B2/A4 collaboration. Outline. The problem HC-intensity asymmetry
Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.
Institut für Kernphysik
der Uni Mainz
Experiment.Polarized source tasks
1.) Reliable beam production at desired intensity level
2.) Provide desired spin orientation
3.) High Polarization (>80%)
I.) Polarization meas. DA/A ~DP small
limiting factor in several PV-exp.
II.) HC-control A always important
limiting especially when A<10-6
Source team can provide support for point (I),
(II) is more important.
D measures R+-
Let x be a vector formed from the relevant parameters:
Goal: Error of HCA should be small against other error contributions. (DP, Dstat)
1.) The (average) values of xi+-xi- have to be measured with good accuracy.
good stability of xi + high spin flip frequency desirable
2.) Relative sensitivities have to be determined and are only known with limited accuracy.
Higher order coefficients usually not well known.
(xi+-xi-) should be “small” (i.e. sufficiently close to zero).
(Almost) no active HC-compensation, except by stabilization!
Adjust to zero crossing &
Sketch of polarization optics
Result measuring I-HCA=(I+-I-)/(I++I-)
Assuming analysing power of
Photocathode, imperfections in the alignment and in the phase shifts (birefringences) of the optical
Elements (similar to Humensky et al. NIM A 521 (2004) 261)
Description with 4X4 polarization transfer matrices:
For ‘thin’ cathodes: I+- ~ S+-0
Predicted I-HCA as function of compensator rotation angle b
AISR=Analysing power of cathode, with polarizer axis oriented at 2qk,
Measured for several high P cathodes: AISR=0.02-0.05
fa= f++f-/p: Normalized asymmetric phase shift of pockels cell
(forced zero crossing!),fa=0.03 (typ.)
e3=circular stokes component of light at input of Pockels cell,
Not measured, est. to <0.003
s~0.999 = diagonal polarisation component at input of Pockels cell,
fc= deviation of half wave plate from 180 degree retardation
0.01 (quote by company)
D,c=function of birefringence of optical elements between PC and cathode.
1.) Stability does not depend on the symmetric phase shift error (f+-f-)-p
2.) Parameters extracted from fit in agreement with reasonable values
of optical imperfections
3.) Introducing an additional half wave plate
(General sign changer) will also change I-HCA.
1.) Absolute value of phase shift does not contribute to IHCA (in first order)
2.) Asymmetric phase shift + compensator temperature dependence!
3.) Sensitivity depends on steepness of zero crossing
4.) Reduction of sensitivity due to stabilization! (1/G~2-10)
Realistic only if second order effects (HC-Transmission changes) do not occur
Offset/(4b amplitude) while varying qk:
Offers to reduce
Problem by order(s)
AISR is the analyzing power of the photocathode which will depend on the photocathode
type (composition, thickness,,,) typically: superlattice 2%, strained layers 4%, GaAs:<0.2%.
1.) Why did PV-experiments before 1990 observe large
asymmetries and position fluctuations
with very small analyzing power of the photocathode?
2.) What is the origin of the HC-fluctuation
of other parameters like position, angle, energy?
low analysing power
Experiment results in I-HCA of 10000 ppm
(no lock in needed!)
Luck! The signal is so large that it´s easy to find a reason….
Backreflexions for the different helicity states.
LOW-E polarimetry provides some support for the experiment if it can be done convienently and fast!
Measurement time < 2min @1% stat. Acc. @20 mA
Beam installation time req: (40min) will be reduced to <15min.
Low energy: Fink et al.: Phys Rev A (38,12), 6055 (1988)
‚High‘ energy: Uginicius et al.:Nucl Phys A 158 418 (1970)
Low energy: Gray et al.: Rev. Sci. Instrum. 55,88 (1984)
High energy: Sromicki et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 82,1, 57 (1999)
Analyzing power can be calculated with less than 1% accuracy
at fixed scattering
(Mayer et al. Rev.Sci. Inst. (64,952(1993))