Search for the graviton at the lhc
Download
1 / 34

Search for the Graviton at the LHC - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 159 Views
  • Uploaded on

Search for the Graviton at the LHC. From Donnachie-Landshoff towards J = 2?. John Ellis FP420 Meeting, Manchester, Dec. 9th, 2007. JE + H.Kowalski + D.Ross, in preparation. Howzat again?. In forward physics?. String theory originated from models of high-energy scattering

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'Search for the Graviton at the LHC' - martha


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
Search for the graviton at the lhc l.jpg

Search for the Graviton at the LHC

From Donnachie-Landshoff

towards J = 2?

John Ellis

FP420 Meeting,

Manchester, Dec. 9th, 2007

JE + H.Kowalski + D.Ross, in preparation


Howzat again l.jpg
Howzat again?

In forward physics?

  • String theory originated from models of high-energy scattering

    • Pomeron related to closed string loop

    • First state on Pomeron trajectory spin 2

  • In string as ‘Theory of Everything’, closed string  massless graviton

    • AdS/CFT: Pomeron  graviton in D = 5

    • Intercept = 2 -  at strong coupling

  • Related to ‘hard Pomeron’ seen at HERA?

    • Intercept  1.4 + ???

  • Probe with hard diffraction @ LHC: FP420?

JE + H.Kowalski + D.Ross, in preparation


Clue from low x physics @ hera l.jpg
Clue from Low-x Physics @ HERA?

  • Increasing rate of growth of *p total cross section at high energy as Q2 increases

    = inclusive hard diffraction


Outline l.jpg
Outline

  • Reminder of the BFKL Pomeron

  • Genesis of string theory in high-energy hadron scattering

    • AdS/CFT formulation in 5 dimensions

  • Relation to BFKL

    • BFKL with running coupling

  • Reminder of the HERA hard Pomeron

    • Saturation effects?

    • Prospects for BFKL fit

  • Possibilities for FP420?


Bfkl diffusion in k space l.jpg
BFKL: Diffusion in k Space

  • Diffusion in  = ln(k2/QCD2) vs rapidity

  • Eigenvalue equation

  • equivalent to diffusion


Bfkl equation l.jpg
BFKL Equation

  • Diagrammatically:

  • Algebraically:

  • E’functions & e’values:

    &

    where

  • Solution


Fast rewind of bfkl l.jpg
Fast Rewind of BFKL

  • Impact factor (vertex) I

    experiment (proton)? Calculable (Higgs)?

  • BFKL propagator f obeys:

  • Kernel K for diffusion in s, k

  • Solution is cut singularity


Genesis of string theory l.jpg
Genesis of String Theory

  • Duality between direct-channel resonances and Regge behaviour at high energies:

  • Expressed mathematically (Veneziano)

  • Interpreted as quantum theory of open string

  • Unitarity requires closed string

  • Virasoro amplitude:


Pomeron in string theory l.jpg
Pomeron in String Theory

  • Modern formulation: vertices attached to closed string world sheet

  • In flat space:

  • Note smaller Regge slope


Pomeron in ads cft i l.jpg
Pomeron in AdS/CFT - I

  • Strongly-coupled gauge theory  weakly-coupled string theory in curved space

  • Radius related to gauge coupling

Exact only for N = 4 supersymmetric QCD

Brower + Polchinski + Strassler + Tan


Pomeron in ads cft ii l.jpg
Pomeron in AdS/CFT - II

  • Laplacian in AdS:

  • Pomeron propagator in AdS:

  • Scattering amplitude (R ~ gYM2):

Brower + Polchinski + Strassler + Tan


String theory bfkl l.jpg
String Theory  BFKL

  • Comparison of string and BFKL results:

  • Comparison of intercepts:

But BFKL singularity is a cut at fixed coupling


The grand unified pomeron l.jpg
The ‘Grand Unified’ Pomeron

BFKL at fixed weak coupling 

bare graviton at fixed strong coupling


Bfkl vs ads cft l.jpg

BFKL vs AdS/CFT

AdS/CFT

LO BFKL

NLO BFKL

Important corrections to BFKL at NLO


Bfkl with running coupling l.jpg
BFKL with Running Coupling

  • J-plane cut replaced by a discrete set of poles:

  • With calculable profiles:


With running qcd coupling l.jpg
With Running QCD Coupling

  • Running coupling:

  • Eigenfunction with eigenvalue :

  • No real solution for  > c:

  • Profile:

Assume phase at 0 fixed by

non-perturbative dynamics

Discrete eigenvalues 

Regge poles, not cuts


Leading order bfkl k 2 profiles l.jpg
Leading-Order BFKL k2 Profiles

 = 0.41

 = 0.22

 = 0.15

 = 0.12

JE + H.Kowalski + D.Ross, in preparation


Nlo bfkl k 2 profiles l.jpg
NLO BFKL k2 Profiles

 = 0.29

 = 0.18

 = 0.14

BFKL intercepts reduced

k2 profiles ‘similar’ to LO

JE + H.Kowalski + D.Ross, in preparation


Back to low x physics @ hera deep inelastic structure function l.jpg
Back to Low-x Physics @ HERA:Deep-inelastic structure function

  • At low x and high Q2, steep rise in structure function

    = distribution of partons, integrated over kT


Low x physics @ hera ii p total cross section l.jpg
Low-x Physics @ HERA - II*p total cross section

  • Increasing rate of growth of *p total cross section at high energies as Q2 increases

    = inclusive ‘hard’ diffraction


Low x physics @ hera iii l.jpg
Low-x Physics @ HERA - III

  • Increasing rate of growth of total *p cross section = inclusive ‘hard’ diffraction

  • Also vector-meson production at high energies as Q2 increases

    = exclusive ‘hard’ diffraction


Extracting proton vertex using dipole model l.jpg
Extracting Proton Vertex using Dipole Model

  • Equivalent to LO QCD

    for small dipoles

  • Can use vector meson

    production to extract proton profile:

Kowalski + Moltyka + Watt


Low x physics @ hera iv vector meson production l.jpg
Low-x Physics @ HERA - IVVector-meson production

  • Proton vertex determined, Vector-meson vertex calculable

  • Comparisons with rates of growth of *p  Vp, p cross sections at high energies as Q2 increases

    = exclusive ‘hard’ diffraction

Kowalski + Moltyka + Watt


Absorption saturation l.jpg
Absorption & Saturation?

Expected at low x and high Q2, as number of partons grows, and they overlap


How important is saturation l.jpg
How Important is Saturation?

  • Eikonal exponentiation:

  • Depends on impact parameter, momentum scale

  • Define saturation scale Qs by

  • Estimate Qs using indicative models for proton impact-parameter profile and gluon distribution:


How important is saturation26 l.jpg
How Important is Saturation?

Apparently little saturation at

Qs2 = 4 GeV2

Estimate of Qs

H.Kowalski


Towards bfkl fit to low x data l.jpg
Towards BFKL Fit to low-x Data

  • Unintegrated low-x gluon distribution extracted from *p cross section using dipole model

  • Fit using k2 profiles for leading, subleading BFKL wave functions

JE + H.Kowalski + D.Ross, in preparation


Search for the graviton by looking in the opposite direction l.jpg

Search for the Graviton - by Looking in the Opposite Direction

BFKL intercept increases  2 (?) as k0 decreases

BFKL intercept decreases as k0 increases (J/ ?)

JE + H.Kowalski + D.Ross, in preparation


Possible lhc measurements l.jpg
Possible LHC measurements?

  • Consider diffractive production of a ‘small’ object

  • Single or double diffraction?

    • y = ln(s/mX2) or y1 + y2 = ln(s/mX2) ?

  • Examples:

    • pp  p (jet pair), pp  p (D c)

    • pp  p c p, pp  p H p

      • Rising rapidity plateau?

Sexy bread-and-butter for FP420?

JE + H.Kowalski + D.Ross, in preparation



Most of m a tan planes not wmap compatible l.jpg
Most of (mA, tan ) Planes NOT WMAP-Compatible

J.E., Hahn, Henemeyer, Olive + Weiglein


Non universal scalar masses l.jpg
Non-Universal Scalar Masses

  • Different sfermions with same quantum #s?

    e.g., d, s squarks?

    disfavoured by upper limits on flavour- changing neutral interactions

  • Squarks with different #s, squarks and sleptons?

    disfavoured in various GUT models

    e.g., dR = eL, dL = uL = uR = eR in SU(5), all in SO(10)

  • Non-universal susy-breaking masses for Higgses?

    No reason why not!

NUHM


Wmap compatible m a tan surfaces in nuhm l.jpg
WMAP-Compatible (mA, tan) Surfaces in NUHM

  • Within CMSSM, generic choices of mA, tan do not have correct relic density

  • Use extra NUHM parameters to keep h2 within WMAP range, e.g.,

    • m0 = 800 GeV,  = 1000 GeV, m1/2 ~9/8 mA

    • m1/2 = 500, m0 = 1000,  ~ 250 to 400 GeV

  • Make global fit to electroweak and B observables

  • Analyze detectability @ Tevatron/LHC/ILC


Wmap surfaces @ tevatron lhc ilc l.jpg
WMAP Surfaces @ Tevatron, LHC, ILC

J.E., Hahn, Heinemeyer, Olive + Weiglein: arXiv:0709.0098


ad