Indicators on and off course teaching and working with sustainability indicators
This presentation is the property of its rightful owner.
Sponsored Links
1 / 28

INDICATORS ON AND OFF COURSE: TEACHING AND WORKING WITH SUSTAINABILITY INDICATORS PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 98 Views
  • Uploaded on
  • Presentation posted in: General

INDICATORS ON AND OFF COURSE: TEACHING AND WORKING WITH SUSTAINABILITY INDICATORS. Dr. Peter Hardi Senior Fellow, IISD Winnipeg, Canada April 2005 [email protected] Timeliness. United Nations Decade of Education for Sustainable Development has begun on January 1, 2005

Download Presentation

INDICATORS ON AND OFF COURSE: TEACHING AND WORKING WITH SUSTAINABILITY INDICATORS

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript


Indicators on and off course teaching and working with sustainability indicators

INDICATORS ON AND OFF COURSE: TEACHING AND WORKING WITH SUSTAINABILITY INDICATORS

Dr. Peter Hardi

Senior Fellow, IISD

Winnipeg, Canada

April 2005

[email protected]


Timeliness

Timeliness

  • United Nations Decade of Education for Sustainable Development has begun on January 1, 2005

  • European ministers of environment and education adopted a strategy

    • develop indicators to measure the effectiveness of the implementation of the Strategy

  • universities’ role in educating future experts

    • possess more than practical know-how to use indicators

    • understand science and methodology behind the tools


What is taught on sdis at universities on course

What is taught on SDIs at universities (on course)?

Questions to consider:

  • What is taught?

  • How is it taught?

  • Why is it taught?

  • How is it linked to practice?


What is taught on sdis at universities on course examples from canada

What is taught on SDIs at universities (on course)?Examples from Canada

  • 1. Royal Roads University

  • Science, Technology and Environment Division, Master of Science in Environmental Science program

  • The interdisciplinary program devotes a section to SDIs

  • Sets model for other Canadian universities to implement SD strategies

  • http://www.royalroads.ca/Channels/


Canadian examples cont

Canadian examples (cont.)

2. Carleton University, Ottawa, Ontario

  • Campus Sustainability Assessment

  • The illustration below presents the way indicators are defined for the ecosystem health-human health system (based on the “egg of well-being” metaphor)


Http www carleton ca cscn gitp

http://www.carleton.ca/cscn/gitp/


Canadian examples cont 3 university of british columbia vancouver bc

Canadian examples (cont.)3. University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC

  • Course Agroecology 361: Key indicators on sustainable agriculture

  • Practical and conceptual approach

  • Quantitative and qualitative indicators to assess the direction and degree of sustainability of a farm or a farming system

  • specific application of indicator usage to an agricultural topic


Canadian examples cont 4 u of manitoba

Canadian examples (cont.)4. U of Manitoba

Lectures on SD measurement and indicators:

part of Ecological Economics class (Dept. Economics)

Structure of the lectures:

1. Assumptions: pre-existing knowledge of basic concepts of SD, environmental protection and economics theories (including statistics and econometrics)

2. Definition of concepts related directly to the presentation: Assessment, measurement, indicators, frameworks

3. Data requirements, data processing and techniques of indicator construction

4. Role of classification in measurements and most frequent classifications


U of manitoba structure of the lecture cont

U of ManitobaStructure of the lecture (cont.)

5. Classification by measurement frameworks

6. Detailed presentation of indicator systems in a continuum from isolated economic and environmental frameworks through combined ones to new, holistic frameworks specifically developed for SD

7. Discussion of communicating results and channeling into decision making

8. Importance of feedback and participatory process in design of indicator systems


Examples for other university programs

Examples for other university programs

1. Overseas Development Group, University of East Anglia, UK

Indicators for Sustainable Development course:

  • explore the current use of indicators and teach a practical, participatory and holistic approach to their development

  • five key areas of indicator application


Odg course cont

ODG course (cont.)

  • Describing the current use of indicators of all kinds in a wide range of different global contexts;

  • Reflecting on the use of such indicators and developing a critique of good and poor practice;

  • Reviewing alternative methods for developing indicators of all kinds;

  • Learning a tried and tested holistic approach to the development of SIs - 'Systemic Sustainability Analysis'* - in the development of new indicators; and

  • Applying this to participants' own country contexts.

    (*Bell and Morse)


Examples for other university programs the baltic university network

Examples for other university programs:The Baltic University Network

http://www.balticuniv.uu.se/

Network of 180 universities & institutes

of higher learning


The baltic university network cont

The Baltic University Network (cont.)

Courses deal directly with sustainability issues:

  • indicators within the context of implementation

  • Baltic experience with Local Agenda 21

  • industrial adoption of life cycle analysis

  • Sustainability indicators

  • Frames for SD work

  • Actors for SD and their roles

  • Life Cycle Assessment


  • Dilemmas of teaching sdis at universities

    Dilemmas of teaching SDIs at universities

    • Background knowledge to build on: Is there any; how reliable?

    • Basic concepts and their interpretations: Conflicting values and ideologies

    • Theory vs. practice oriented approach

    • Participatory vs. expert based process

    • How much quantitative analysis is required: The depth of statistical and econometric techniques

    • Discussion of frameworks: Needed or not?

    • Discussion of specific areas of application: applied science or esoteric knowledge?


    Recommendations follow a dual path

    Recommendations: follow a dual path

    1. Focus on theory:

    • Review the professional/academic discourse on SD and its assessment

    • analyze the leading theories and their supporting empirical bases

    • distill all these into the backbone of an introductory course

    • analyze the gray areas, the contradictions and the open questions in theories and concepts

    • amend the backbone with the presentation of the critical issues

    • signal the areas where further research and intellectual work is needed.


    Recommendations cont

    Recommendations (cont.)

    2. Focus on practice:

    • Review existing practices aimed at implementing SD and assessing the progress in real life situations

    • Try to conceptualize the necessary conditions of successful projects, the expertise and technical factors needed to implement such projects

    • Focus on how these findings could be translated into a higher educational course that help organize and manage such processes

      Summing up:

    • Universities may help student to deal with the subject matter intellectually (on-course activity) and

    • empirically (off-course activity)

      • activity on and/or off campus.


    What is done with sdis at universities off course

    What is done with SDIs at universities (off course)?

    Making campuses more sustainable:

    General approach

    • Mission of the Association of University Leaders for a Sustainable Future (ULSF): Make sustainability a major focus of teaching, research, operations and outreach at colleges and universities worldwide (details: see the Talloires Declaration) http://www.ulsf.org/programs_talloires_td.html


    Specific approaches

    Specific approaches

    1. University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA

    http://www.sustainable.ufl.edu/indicators.pdf

    • Sustainability Indicators, August 2001: Published in accord with the Global Reporting Initiative, Sustainability Reporting Guidelines

    • Prepared for baselining the University of Florida’s systems

    • Future work: develop metrics for benchmarking; identify numerical targets; develop composite indices and performance indicators


    Specific approaches cont

    Specific approaches (cont.)

    2. Clarion University of Pennsylvania, Clarion, PA, USA: http://physics.clarion.edu/faculty/jpearce/sustainability.html#Sustainability%20Indicators%20and%20Policy%20Report%20for%20Clarion%20University

    Sustainability Indicators and Policy Report for Clarion University:

    • builds on the prior Indicators Reports to both quantify past progress towards a sustainable Clarion University and provide a guide for future actions

    • provides detailed and economically viable policy recommendations to improve SDIs in order to firmly establish Clarion in a leadership role in environmental stewardship among other universities

    • Helps students internalize their role as members of the sustainable Clarion community


    Specific approaches cont1

    Specific approaches (cont.)

    3. University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan USA

    Sustainability Assessment and Reporting for the University of Michigan's Ann Arbor Campus April 2002

    http://css.snre.umich.edu/css_doc/CSS02-04.pdf


    U of michigan cont

    U of Michigan (cont.)

    The Report:

    • proposed a definition of sustainability and a framework for assessment tailored to the U-M AA;

    • used the framework to evaluate a set of sustainability indicators;

    • provided a baseline for indicators;

    • utilized the Triple Bottom Line concept;

    • provided recommendations for an institutionalized reporting process.

      The assessment is also a Master’s Project


    Specific approaches research

    Specific approaches: Research

    University of Sydney, NSW, Australia

    Integrated Sustainability Analysis™@ The University of Sydney

    http://www.isa.org.usyd.edu.au/TBLEPA.shtml

    • 2-year Sustainability Reporting Pilot Program to develop tools for organisations

    • provide a consistent framework within which companies and organisations can undertake sustainability reporting

    • use collaboratively defined and relevant indicators and national statistics

    • underpin work by established economic theory

    • bridge the gap between ‘hard science’ and the real-life issues and needs of people who want to make a difference in the workplace.


    Analysis of indicator projects at universities

    Analysis of indicator projects at universities

    Interest in teaching SDIs:

    • individual teacher’s interest

    • department’s conscious efforts to build a curriculum on SD

    • university’s policy to implement SD on the campus and beyond

      Accomplish this goal with three types of activities:

    • Education – teaching SD and, as part of it, SDIs as a scientific discipline or discourse;

    • Research – conducting applied scientific research on the critical issues of SD and the proper application of SDIs in the public and private sectors; and

    • Action – implementing projects aimed at making the campus and/or other communities more sustainable.


    Analysis of indicator projects cont

    Analysis of indicator projects (cont.)

    • University’s obligation to educate students on issues that govern the university’s philosophy and policies

    • Help their students understand the concepts and practices of SD and be professionally prepared to actively participate in the implementation of the university’s policy

    • University as a community implementing a special set of policies has an obligation to assure the participation of its students and measure the outcome

    • Above two obligations together could result in the participation of students in activities on and off course

      • They would need to learn about SDIs on course and work with them off course

      • if such programs are successful, students and alumni would deal with SD and SDIs both on and off campus.


    Analysis of indicator projects cont1

    Analysis of indicator projects (cont.)

    Relationship between on and off course issues:

    • What do the students need to know on the subject?

    • How can they contribute to real life projects?

    • What can they learn from practical involvement?

      • What kind of feedback is possible and/or necessary between off course activities and on course teaching?

      • What kind of lessons these projects offer beyond academic carriers?


    Answers to the first question

    Answers to the first question:

    • Teach and discuss the definition, interpretation and everyday significance of concepts of SD and SDIs

    • Provide intellectual and moral motivation to participate in actual projects promoting SD, including projects on the campus

    • Teach how to use quantitative methods

    • Challenge: teaching must focus on intellectual rigor but needs to discuss uncertainties, discuss ideological components and political influence, but without advocacy


    Answers to the second question

    Answers to the second question:

    • Required: Empirical analysis of ongoing SD projects, their use of indicators and other measurement tools

    • Empirical analysis needs to be linked to the conceptual analysis

    • May generate new types of research

      • controversial, particularly participatory research

      • role of ethics in conducting scientific work


    Answers to the third question

    Answers to the third question:

    • Students participating in campus SD projects are de facto accepting not simply a scientific truth but an ideological and sometimes a political position

      • Reflects the university’s action to promote SD

    • It is important to understand that not everybody would share this vision and the related actions

      • Additional arguments why SD should be taught in university courses not only as part of the scientific discourse but also as part of the ethical discourse

    • Need further research both in the science of sustainability…

      • which is still in its infancy (if it exists at all) and

    • …and the ethical issues SD raises

      • through decision making and political actions to implement it.


  • Login