slide1
Download
Skip this Video
Download Presentation
Shared Care Collaborative approach for improving the detection, assessment and treatment of depression

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 38

Shared Care Collaborative approach for improving the detection, assessment and treatment of depression - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 208 Views
  • Uploaded on

Shared Care Collaborative approach for improving the detection, assessment and treatment of depression. Cheryl Washburn, Ph.D, R.Psych., UBC Counselling Services Patricia Mirwaldt, M.D. CCFP, UBC Student Health Services Whitney Sedgwick, Ph.D, R.Psych., UBC Counselling Services.

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'Shared Care Collaborative approach for improving the detection, assessment and treatment of depression' - marli


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
slide1

Shared Care Collaborative approach for improving the detection, assessment and treatment of depression

Cheryl Washburn, Ph.D, R.Psych., UBC Counselling Services

Patricia Mirwaldt, M.D. CCFP, UBC Student Health Services

Whitney Sedgwick, Ph.D, R.Psych., UBC Counselling Services

ubc shared care collaborative
UBC Shared Care Collaborative
  • community centered collaborative network of primary care providers, working as a multidisciplinary team; enabling sustainable improvement in the primary treatment of depression at UBC and the surrounding community
learning objectives
Learning Objectives

This workshop will:

  • Describe the key features involved in the development and implementation of a shared care collaborative model for the treatment of depression
  • Present data reflecting established stretch goals
  • Outline some of the challenges and benefits of a shared care collaborative for the treatment of depression
  • Discuss the applicability of a shared care model in your respective communities
slide4

The UBC Collaborative

UBC

Student Health

Services

Patient

UBC

Urgent Care

UBC

Health Clinic

University

Village Medical

Clinic

UBC Counseling

Services

UBC Community

VancouverCoastal Health

time line
Time Line

Sept/03: position paper

Jun/04: Initial stakeholders meeting

Aug/04: Planning session (i.e. conceptual models)

Oct/04: Funding proposal submitted

March/05: Funding approved

June/05: Planning session (i.e. scope, membership)

time line cont
Time Line (cont.)

Oct/05: Learning session (i.e. reviewed best practice models)

Nov/05: Planning session (stretch goals)

Jan/06: Learning session part I (Suicide assessment)

March/06: Learning session, part II (Suicide assessment)

March/06: Progress report submitted to VCH

time line cont8
Time Line (cont.)

June, Oct, Dec 06: ongoing: data review and tech. consultations re: data input

March/07: Modification to stretch goals

March/07: Flowsheet revision

Ongoing: Consideration of sustainability post-funding

gaps in care
Gaps in care

Public:

  • Lack of awareness of signs/symptoms, prevention and available resources and services
  • Stigma associated with depression and treatments that prevent people from receiving help.
  • Failure to comply with treatment.

Service Delivery

  • Failure to recognize/assess depression, educate patients and families about nature of depression and support self management
  • Failure to recommend evidence-based psychotherapy
  • Inadequate dosage and duration of meds
  • Lack of time and compensation
  • Limited access to mental health professionals
  • Lack of ongoing monitoring and maintenance of change despite high rates of relapse and recurrence
  • Lack of integration among multiple existing primary health care services
key features of models to address gaps in depression care
Key features of models to address gaps in depression care
  • Managed (chronic) care
  • Evidence based stepped care approach that implements enhanced tools, decision supports, and established core measures

3. Capacity building and sustainable: both in numbers served and in physicians’ capacity to recognize and treat mental health issues (ie; education).

  • Collaborative: Integrating the services of primary care physicians and mental health practitioners.
  • Model for improved service delivery
slide13

Framework for change: The Care Model

Adapted from Glasgow, R., Orleans, C., Wagner, E., Curry, S., Solberg, L. (2001). Does the Chronic Care Model also serve as a

template for improving prevention? The Milbank Quarterly, 79(4), and World Health Organization, Health and Welfare

Canada and Canadian Public Health Association.(1986).Ottawa Charter of Health Promotion.

framework for change model for improvement institute for healthcare improvement
Framework for Change: Model for ImprovementInstitute for Healthcare Improvement

Aims

Measures

Changes

Test

Changes

Implement changes more

broadly

slide16

The UBC Collaborative

UBC

Student Health

Services

Patient

UBC

Urgent Care

UBC

Health Clinic

University

Village Medical

Clinic

UBC Counseling

Services

UBC Community

VancouverCoastal Health

aims of collaborative
Aims of Collaborative
  • Improve health outcomes specific to depression
  • Develop and implement more effective suicide risk assessment practices
  • Facilitate patient self-management skills
  • Improve access to treatment for depression for members of the UBC and University neighborhood communities
  • Develop the primary healthcare network in the UBC community
bc provincial depression strategy recommended approaches 2002
BC Provincial Depression Strategy Recommended Approaches (2002)
  • Early intervention
  • Collaborative care
  • Stepped care
  • Chronic disease management model
stretch goals results
Stretch Goals/Results:

N= 170 (Nov 1, 2006)

  • % patients given PHQ-9 (Patient Health Questionnaire) at, or within 10 days of, diagnosis

Stretch goal: 85%  Results: 137/170=80.6%

  • % patients given second PHQ-9 within 8 weeks of diagnosis

Stretch goal: 85%**Results: 30/137= 21.9%

  • % patients given third PHQ-9 within 16 weeks of diagnosis

Stretch goal: 75%** Results: 12/30 = 40%

(** of those who completed initial assessment(s))

stretch goals results21
Stretch Goals/Results:
  • % patients who have completed a PHQ-9 between 6-12 months post-diagnosis

Stretch goal: 50% Results**: 164/170= 96.5%

  • % patients with PHQ-9 score reduced to < 5 (or in remission) by 16 weeks

Stretch goal: 50% (of depression register population of patients)

  • % patients with PHQ-9 score reduced to <5 (or in remission) within 6-12 months post-diagnosis

Stretch goal: 50%(of depression register population of patients)

Results:** 36/170= 21.2%

**(collapsed over 12 months)

stretch goals results22
Stretch Goals/Results:
  • % patients who had a suicide risk assessment at, or within, 10 days of diagnosis.

Stretch goal: 100%Results = 62.4%

  • % patients who had second suicide risk assessment within 8 weeks of diagnosis

Stretch goal: 70% (of those who completed first assessment)

Results: 30/137= 21.9%

  • % patients who had shird suicide risk assessment within 6 months of diagnosis

Stretch goal: 50% (of those who completed second assessment)

Results: 12/30 = 40.0%

  • % patients who had a self-management goal documented

Stretch goal: 50% Results: 111/170= 65.3%

additional stretch goals
Additional Stretch Goals:
  • % patients with second contact within 8 weeks of diagnosis

Stretch goal: 85% **

  • % patients with third contact made within 16 weeks of diagnosis

Stretch goal: 85% **

  • % patients with PHQ-9 score between 5-19 with no exclusionary co-morbid conditions who have been offered mood management group

Stretch goal: 90%

  • % patients who have been offered psycho-educational material

Stretch goal: 50%

(** of those who completed initial assessment(s))

group counselling
Group counselling

-A key treatment option:

-detailed referral form and FAQ sheet

-6 week, psychoeducational CBT groups entitled “Mood management”

-positive self-report re: mood (based on 18 groups):

Pre-group PHQ-9 mean score=12.1

Post-group PHQ-9 mean score= 5.9

initial challenges
Initial Challenges
  • Recruitment:
    • Motivation to join
    • Time commitment
    • Compensation – salaried and fee for service considerations
  • Consent Issues:
    • Designing an informed consent form considering:
        • BC Health
        • BC Privacy Commissioner
        • VCHA
        • UBC Freedom of Information Coordinator
    • Confidentiality
initial challenges26
Initial Challenges
  • Group Counseling:
    • Who’s patient is this? (physician and/or counselor)
    • Counselor acceptance and management of non-students (ex. UBC faculty and staff) in groups.
    • “Buy In” - physician and patient (acceptance as valid treatment option)
ongoing challenges
Ongoing Challenges
  • Data base:
    • Electronic medical records and linkages
    • Primary care provider inclusion in registry (ex. Non-MD)
    • Data and file management (time, data configuration, flowsheets)
  • Self-care:
    • Physician confidence in guiding patients in self care of depression management
  • Follow-up:
    • High attrition with this population including practitioners’ reticence to contact patients who missed last appointment
    • Lack of systematic follow-up of patients who have completed care to ensure healthy outcomes
benefits
Benefits
  • Patients get better from depression-symptoms recede!!
  • Improved education and awareness of community, practitioners and affiliated health care providers.
  • Early and accurate diagnosis with step-wise application of evidence based care.
  • Sustainable network infrastructure provides improved access to existing resources and increased practitioner capacity.
benefits35
Benefits

5. Clear focus on group counseling and improved community access to groups.

6. Self management tools developed and utilized as the cornerstone of care.

7. Shared community of care = healthier campus and community.

questions
Questions:

In what ways could a shared care model have applicability on your campus?

In what ways would a shared care model apply to other health issues on your campus?

reference list
Reference list
  • Bilsker, D., & Paterson, R. (2005). Antidepressant Skills Workbook. Mental Health

Evaluation and Community Consultation Unit, University of British Columbia.

  • British Columbia Provincial Depression Strategy Phase 1 Report, October 2002.

http://www.healthservices.gov.bc.ca/mhd/pdf/depressionstrategy.pdf

  • British Columbia Treatment Guidelines and Protocols for Diagnosis and Management of Major Depressive Disorder: http://www.healthservices.gov.bc.ca/msp/protoguides/gps/depression.pdf (contains references, p.9 and 10).
  • Fisher, L., & Ransom, D.C. (1997). Developing a strategy for managing behavioural

health care within the context of primary care. Archives of Family Medicine, 6, 324-

333.

  • Iglehart, J.K. (2004). The mental health maze and the call for transformation. The New England Journal of Medicine, 350, 507- 514.
  • Innes, G. (1999). The health transition fund and the future of Canadian health care

delivery. Journal of Emergency Medicine, 17, 157-158.

  • Kates, N., Craven, M., Bishop, J., Clinton, T., Kraftcheck, D., LeClair, K., Leverette, J., Nash, L., & Turner, T. (1997). Shared mental health care in Canada. The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 42(8).
  • Kates, N. & Craven, M. (1998). Managing mental health problems. A practical guide for

primary care. Seattle: Hogrefe & Huber Publishers.

  • Katon,W., Rutter,C., Ludman, E.J. et al. (2001). A randomized trial of relapse prevention of depression in primary care. Archives of General Psychiatry, 58 (3), 241-247.
  • Kroenke K, Spitzer R L, Williams J B. (2001). The PHQ-9: Validity of a brief depression severity measure. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 16(9): 606-613
  • Lam, W.R., (2004). Targeted Resources to Improve Primary Care Outcomes in Depression (TRIPOD): An Educational Intervention for Implementing BC Depression Guidelines.
  • MacMillan, H.L., Patterson, C.J.S., & Wathen, C.N. and The Canadian Task Force on

Preventive Health Care. (2005). Screening for depression in primary care:

recommendation statement from the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care.

Canadian Medical Association Journal, 172, (1).

  • Paterson, R. (1997). Changeways Core Programme Trainer’s Manual. Vancouver, B.C.
  • Price, J.R. (2000). Managing physical symptoms: The clinical assessment as treatment.

Journal of Psychosomatic Research. 48, 1-10.

  • Whooley, M.A., Avins, A.L., Miranda, J., & Browner, W.S. (1997). Case-finding

instruments for depression. Two questions are as good as many. J. Gen. Intern. Med,

12, 439-445.

  • World Health Organization. (2000). Towards Unity for Health: Challenges and

opportunities for partnership in health development.

ad