1 / 36

Class 12: Communities

Class 12: Communities. Dr. Baruch Barzel. Network Science: Communities. The Modular Structure of Networks. Is a Network Modular. Clustering implies modularity. Functionality requires modularity. Small Worldness tends to wipe out modularity. Is a Network Modular.

marlee
Download Presentation

Class 12: Communities

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Class 12: Communities • Dr. Baruch Barzel Network Science: Communities

  2. The Modular Structure of Networks

  3. Is a Network Modular Clustering implies modularity Functionality requires modularity Small Worldness tends to wipe out modularity

  4. Is a Network Modular Clustering implies modularity Functionality requires modularity Small Worldness tends to wipe out modularity Hubs tends to wipe out modularity

  5. Is a Network Modular Clustering at the periphery only Low degree nodes typically belong to a single module Hubs bridge between different modules

  6. Is a Network Modular Clustering at the periphery only Low degree nodes typically belong to a single module Hubs bridge between different modules But how do we unveil the modules

  7. The Modular Structure of Networks Functionalmodularity Natural partition lines

  8. Network Partitioning Optimally dividing the network into a predefined number of partitions Dividing a task into sub-tasks

  9. Network Partitioning Optimally dividing the network into a predefined number of partitions Dividing a task into sub-tasks, while minimizing the transmission between tasks

  10. Network Partitioning Optimally dividing the network into a predefined number of partitions Dividing a task into sub-tasks, while minimizing the transmission between tasks

  11. Network Partitioning Minimizing the Cut: The index vector: The Laplacian Matrix:

  12. The Laplacian Matrix Minimizing the Cut: Consider the Eigenvector: Choose the Eigenvector with the minimal Eigenvalue

  13. The Laplacian Matrix Minimizing the Cut: Consider the Eigenvector: Choose the Eigenvector with the minimal Eigenvalue

  14. The Laplacian Matrix The matrix: The trivial partitioning – put the entire network together: or

  15. The Laplacian Matrix The matrix: The case of isolated components The number of Eigenvectors with λ = 0 equals the number of connected components

  16. The Laplacian Matrix The matrix: The case of almost isolated components The Eigenvectors with λclose to zero capture the partitioning

  17. From Partitioning to Communities The number of communities and their size should be given by the network itself.

  18. Hierarchical Clustering Edges 4 Sides Stable Equal 1. Square + + + + 2. Rectangle + + + -- 3. Circle -- -- -- -- 4. Triangle + -- + +

  19. Hierarchical Clustering Edges 4 Sides Stable Equal 1. Square + + + + 2. Rectangle + + + -- 3. Circle -- -- -- -- 4. Triangle + -- + +

  20. Hierarchical Clustering Edges 4 Sides Stable Equal 1. Square + + + + 2. Rectangle + + + -- 3. Circle -- -- -- -- 4. Triangle + -- + +

  21. Hierarchical Clustering Edges 4 Sides Stable Equal 1. Square + + + + 2. Rectangle + + + -- 3. Circle -- -- -- -- 4. Triangle + -- + +

  22. Dendograms

  23. Dendograms

  24. Topologically Induced Weights

  25. Betweeness Edge Betweeness – the number of paths through an edge

  26. Football and Karate Networks Zachary’s Karate Club College Football

  27. Football and Karate Networks Zachary’s Karate Club College Football

  28. Ising and Potts Models

  29. Ising and Potts Models Groups of nodes with high link density will tend to have the same polarization Sparseness of connections between groups will allow different communities to have unrelated spins

  30. Ising and Potts Models Potts Model Groups of nodes with high link density will tend to have the same polarization Sparseness of connections between groups will allow different communities to have unrelated spins

  31. Ising and Potts Models

  32. Ising and Potts Models

  33. Ising and Potts Models

  34. Ising and Potts Models

  35. Ising and Potts Models

  36. Link Communities Community - A group of densely connected nodes Project Presentations (5 min.) Define your network (nodes, links) How will you get the data Estimated size of network Why A group of topologically similar links

More Related