1 / 14

2009 October/November Exam Results Analysis Presented at the Management Committee 19 January 2010

2009 October/November Exam Results Analysis Presented at the Management Committee 19 January 2010. Professor George Subotzky Executive Director: Information & Strategic Analysis. Acknowledgements.

markku
Download Presentation

2009 October/November Exam Results Analysis Presented at the Management Committee 19 January 2010

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. 2009 October/November Exam Results AnalysisPresented at the Management Committee19 January 2010 Professor George Subotzky Executive Director: Information & Strategic Analysis

  2. Acknowledgements The following staff members of DISA provided valuable help and support in preparing the examination results information and this presentation: • Herbert Zemann • Hanlie Liebenberg • Yuraisha Chetty • Esme Wiid • Herman Visser • ElsabeScheepers • RefiloeSefadi

  3. Introduction • As part of its “calendarised” reporting outputs, DISA has been considering the optimal way of reporting various institutional processes, including exam results • After consulting with relevant stakeholders, we propose that the exam results are reported in three distinct views, namely: • The Exam Sitting view • The Course Success view • The Degree Credit Success view (see below) • This update presents the latest available exam results for the 2009 October/November sitting, compared to the equivalent results for the years 2005-8

  4. Exam Results Views

  5. Exam Sitting Schedule – for each academic year This report: 2009 October/November sitting view

  6. Gross Enrolments C Non- Active Nett Enrolments Exam Admission Phase C Not Admitted Admitted Exam Writing Phase Wrote Absent C Re-registration (Repeaters+ Stopouts) Exam Result Phase Supplementary Exam Admitted Pass Results Out. Fail Re-instatement Attrition Supplementary Exam Phase C Supp Absent Supp Wrote Drop Out Supplementary Exam Results Phase Examination Results Model SF SP S RO

  7. Total Oct/NovExam Pass Rate to date, 2005-9

  8. Oct/Nov Exam Pass Rate to date by College, 2005-9

  9. Oct/Nov Exam Pass Rate to date by Race, 2005-9

  10. Oct/Nov Exam Pass Rate to date by Gender, 2005-9

  11. Oct/Nov Exam Pass Rate to date by African, White Students & Gender, 2005-9

  12. Oct/Nov Exam Pass Rateto date by Degree Level, 2005-9

  13. Key Findings • 2009 Oct/Nov EPR slightly up (from 55,58% in 2008 to 55,75%), reflecting a moderate upward trend since 2005 • Despite this increase, Unisa should target at least a 60% average EPR. This would allow us to achieve and supercede the Ministerial target of 56% which applies to the Degree Credit Success Rate • Amongst the Colleges, CLAW dropped by 6,58%, CAES by 3,49% and CHS by 0,34%. However, CHS remained dominant with a 71,92% EPR. CEMS increased by 2,83% • Africans showed an increase of 1,23% to 51,70%, with all other race groups showing slight decreases. However, Whites were still dominant with a 67,13% EPR in 2009

  14. Key Findings • Female students remained dominant with a 58,49% EPR in 2009, thus showing a steady increase each year from 54,13% in 2005. Males showed a slight decline of 1,92% between 2008 and 2009 • Significantly, African and white females showed increases, while a significant gap between white male and white female achievement was evident. The reasons for this should be investigated • The apparent decline in PG should be also investigated • Attrition and failure will be systematically addressed as part of retention and success initiative

More Related