1 / 13

Route Optimization based on ND-Proxy for Mobile Nodes in IPv6 Mobile Networks

This paper discusses the route optimization technique based on ND-Proxy for mobile nodes in IPv6 mobile networks, aiming to improve communication efficiency. It explores the main idea, procedure, analysis, and conclusion of the route optimization approach.

markdarden
Download Presentation

Route Optimization based on ND-Proxy for Mobile Nodes in IPv6 Mobile Networks

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. VTC2004- Spring Route Optimization based on ND-Proxy for Mobile Nodes in IPv6 Mobile Networks Jaehoon Jeong, Kyeongjin Lee, Jungsoo Park, Hyoungjun KimETRI{paul,leekj,pjs,khj}@etri.re.kr http://www.adhoc.6ants.net/~paulThis paper and presentation material are posted on the above site.

  2. Contents • Motivation • Network Mobility (NEMO) • Related Work • Main Idea • Multilink Subnet • ND-Proxy based Route Optimization • Procedure of Route Optimization in Mobile Node • Analysis of Route Optimization • Conclusion

  3. Motivation • Network Mobility (NEMO) Basic Support protocol • Object of NEMO • NEMO allows a mobile network reachable in the Internet through Mobile IPv6 Extension. • NEMO is being developed at IETF NEMO working group • Limitation of Current NEMO Protocol • NEMO supports network mobility by bi-directional tunneling between Mobile Router (MR) and Home Agent (HA). • This does not support route optimization between Mobile Network and Correspondent Node. • Goal of This Paper • Support of Direct Communication between Mobile Node (MN) and Correspondent Node (CN) through Optimal Path

  4. Network Mobility (NEMO) – 1/2 • Role of NEMO Protocol • Session Continuity of Mobile Network Node (MNN) • Connectivity of MNN • Reachability of MNN • Location Management • Key Idea of NEMO • HA forwards data packets destined for Mobile Network. • HA maintains the forwarding information related to Mobile Network Prefix(es).

  5. Network Mobility (NEMO) – 2/2 • Management of Mobile Network Prefix • Binding Update of Implicit Mode • Binding Update of Explicit Mode • Dynamic Routing Protocols • Refer to NEMO draft for detailed information • draft-ietf-nemo-basic-support-02.txt

  6. Related Work • Route Optimization based on Prefix Delegation • Mobile Router (MR) gets a Network Prefix of Access Network through Prefix Delegation Protocol, such as DHCPv6. • MR gets a new prefix from Access Router on a foreign link. • MR provides the prefix for its Mobile Nodes, which is used to make Care-of Address of Mobile Node within Mobile Network. • The prefix is advertised through Router Advertisement (RA) message by MR. • Route Optimization • This makes a direct communication between CN and MN possible via an optimal path, not via a bi-directional tunnel between MR and HA.

  7. Main Idea • Route Optimization though Proxying • Mobile Router (MR) provides the network prefix of its Care-of Address (CoA) for its mobile nodes by playing the role of Neighbor Discovery (ND) Proxy. • Refer to draft-ietf-ipv6-multilink-subnets-00.txt • Mobile Node (MN) can make its CoA as if it is attached to access network directly like MR. • MN and CN can communicate each other via an optimal path because MR forwards their packets as proxy.

  8. Multilink Subnet • Multilink Subnet • A collection of independent links, connected by routers, but sharing a common subnet prefix. • A Multilink Subnet consists of Subnet, NEMO1 and NEMO2 like in the figure.

  9. ND-Proxy based Route Optimization • Advertisement of Access Network Prefix • Access Router AR1 advertises its subnet prefix, AR1_P, like in the figure. • MR1, MR2 and MR3 relay the prefix information received through Proxy-mode interface to Router-mode interface.

  10. Procedure of Route Optimization in Mobile Node – 1/2 • Generation of a new CoA • MN makes its new CoA with access network prefix advertised by MR. • DAD for the new CoA • MN performs Duplicate Address Detection (DAD) of its new CoA. • The DAD message, Neighbor Solicitation, is disseminated to the entire mobile network, a multilink subnet by MRs. • MRs store the MN’s link-local address included in DAD message in their Neighbor Cache. • The link-local address in MR’s Neighbor Cache is used to forward data packets destined to the MN. • Return Routability and Binding Update • MN performs Return Routability and Binding Update for Route Optimization like in Mobile IPv6.

  11. Procedure of Route Optimization in Mobile Node – 2/2 • Delivery of Data Packets • When AR receives data packets destined to an MN and there is no neighbor information for the MN, • The AR multicasts a Neighbor Solicitation (NS) message for address resolution to the solicited-node multicast address of the MN’s IPv6 address. • If an MR knows the link-layer address of the MN, • As ND-Proxy, the MR responds to the NS message by returning its own link-layer address with a unicast Neighbor Advertisement (NA) to the source of the NS message. • Like this, a path is set up between AR and MN through intermediate MRs and AR can forward data packet to MN.

  12. Analysis of Route Optimization 1. Dog-legged Routing via Bi-directional Tunnel 2. Route Optimization via Optimal Path Delay Difference of 1 and 2  d where d is the distance b/w HA & MR

  13. Conclusion • Route Optimization in Multiple Nested Mobile Networks • The communication based on bi-directional tunnel leads to add tunneling delay in proportion to the number of nested mobile network’s levels. • Route optimization in this paper reduces packet delay, packet size and tunneling overhead in Mobile Router. • Because packet size becomes bigger due to extra IPv6 header attached to packet per level of nesting. • Route Optimization for Mobile Nodes is necessary and important when thinking about applicable scenarios. • Network Mobility Service in Public Transportation, such as Bus, Train and Airplane.

More Related