City of Greenville Bus Transfer Facility Public Review Meeting April 29, 2008

1. City of GreenvilleBus Transfer FacilityPublic Review MeetingApril 29, 2008

2. Goal To evaluate and provide a recommendation for a site for the new Bus Transfer Center consistent with economic, urban design and operational requirements. This will be accomplished in a collaborative manner with GREAT, the City, PATS, ECU, the County, Carolina / Greyhound Trailways, and the MMPA Design Team.

3. Greensboro Multimodal Transportation Facility TRANSIT CENTER DESIGN

4. TRANSIT CENTER DESIGN Spartanburg Transit Center

5. TRANSIT CENTER DESIGN Asheville Transit Center

6. INTERMODAL CENTER DESIGN Greensboro Multimodal Transportation Facility

7. INTERMODAL CENTER DESIGN Racine Intermodal Transportation Center

8. INTERMODAL CENTER DESIGN Binghamton Intermodal Transportation Center

9. INTERMODAL CENTER DESIGN Petersburg Multi-Modal Transportation Center

10. INTERMODAL CENTER DESIGN Kalamazoo Transportation Center

11. INTERMODAL CENTER DESIGN Fredericksburg Regional Transit Station

12. Summary of Costs and Benefits for Stakeholders and the Community

13. Public Comments… July 17 & 17, 2008 Meetings • Make it look nice. • Make it a place where people can go and eat and have a place to sit and rest. • Police substation is a good idea. • Being near railroad would entice rail service. • Be accessible. • Have a full cover over the bus loading areas. Winston-Salem is a good example of a full cover and it is opposite of a concert venue so there is activity in the evening. • Building design should feel open. • Secure parking. • No big trees that people can hide behind.

14. Themes for the Facility Theme One – Accessibility Theme Two – Safety and Security Theme Three –Multipurpose Theme Four – Inspiring Theme Five – Streamlined

16. Site Selection Criteria

18. GREAT Site Screening • Access/Operations – Efficient layout/ability to move in and out • Cost – Appropriateness/Most for the money • Size – Adequate for current and future needs • Intermodality – Best location for all transportation providers • Close to Downtown/ECU —Core hub locations • Availability – Assemblage issues • Image – Location/design that will enhance the City’s and transit’s image\ • Urban Design/Planning —Enhance City’s objectives • 10th Street Connector —Access to major future transportation corridor • Economic Development – Enhance opportunities on surrounding sites

19. GREAT Site Screening Matrix –Site Performance

24. Site Selection Pros VS Cons

26. Second Floor Plan

27. Concept A

28. Concept B

29. Concept C