environmental ethics and the use of fixed anchors in wilderness areas
Download
Skip this Video
Download Presentation
Environmental Ethics and the Use of Fixed Anchors in Wilderness Areas

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 12

Agata Czerminska - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 89 Views
  • Uploaded on

Environmental Ethics and the Use of Fixed Anchors in Wilderness Areas. Agata Czerminska. Fixed Anchors. Rock Climbing Nylon slings, Metal bolts and pitons Pounded or drilled into cliff. The Bolting War. Can climbers legally place anchor bolts in federally designated wilderness areas?.

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'Agata Czerminska' - mariska


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
fixed anchors
Fixed Anchors
  • Rock Climbing
  • Nylon slings, Metal bolts and pitons
  • Pounded or drilled into cliff
the bolting war

The Bolting War

Can climbers legally place anchor bolts in federally designated wilderness areas?

the battle erupts
The Battle Erupts
  • 1997: Anchors banned in Sawtooth Wilderness Area in Idaho
  • June 1998: Ban extended to include all wilderness areas
  • Fierce opposition from climbing groups
  • August 1998: Ban repealed
negotiated rulemaking
Negotiated Rulemaking
  • Fixed Anchors in Wilderness Negotiated Rulemaking Advisory Committee met on four separate occasions through the summer of 2000
  • Committee comprised of 21 representatives from organizations such as Wilderness Watch (anti-bolt) and the Access Fund (very pro-bolt)
interpreting the wilderness act
Interpreting the Wilderness Act

Access Fund:

  • Fixed anchor ban contradicts the Wilderness Act’s provision to provide for primitive and unconfined types of recreation
  • Climbing is a legitimate use of public lands and permanent fixed anchors must sometimes be used to ensure climbing safety
interpreting the wilderness act1
Interpreting the Wilderness Act

Wilderness Watch:

  • Fixed anchors are permanent installations as defined by the Wilderness Act and therefore violate the act
  • Bolts would open the hills to mountain bikes, ATVs, and snowmobiles
after a decade of war in the hills environmentalists and rock rats draft a treaty

“After a decade of war in the hills, environmentalists and rock rats draft a treaty”

But do they?

neg reg results
Neg-Reg Results
  • No consensus was reached
ethical analysis
Ethical Analysis
  • Approach in the meetings:

Deontological – contending parties discussed their different interpretations of the Wilderness Act

key factors missing in debates
Key Factors Missing in Debates
  • The impacts of anchors on wildlife and biodiversity
  • Public opinion
  • The role rock climbing plays in local economies, which are tied to recreational use of public lands
policy recommendations
Policy Recommendations
  • Comprehensive study on the effects of climbing on cliff habitats
  • Site specific regulations
  • In some situations: permits limiting number of climbers
ad