Multi drug resistant pathogens
Download
1 / 67

Multi-drug resistant pathogens - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 170 Views
  • Updated On :

Multi-drug resistant pathogens. Helmut Albrecht, MD Division of Infectious Diseases. Disclosures. Grant/Research Support–MSD, J&J, VIIF, Gilead (no payment to me) Consultant–France Foundation (non profit project with Duke), VIIF, Gilead (no honoraria) Speaker’s Bureau–(no honoraria). Agenda.

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'Multi-drug resistant pathogens' - marin


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
Multi drug resistant pathogens l.jpg

Multi-drug resistant pathogens

Helmut Albrecht, MD

Division of Infectious Diseases


Disclosures l.jpg
Disclosures

  • Grant/Research Support–MSD, J&J, VIIF, Gilead (no payment to me)

  • Consultant–France Foundation (non profit project with Duke), VIIF, Gilead (no honoraria)

  • Speaker’s Bureau–(no honoraria)


Agenda l.jpg
Agenda

  • State of the union

  • The players (Resistant pathogens)

  • What to do about them


Antibiotics l.jpg
Antibiotics

  • “Deaths in the US declined by 220 per 100,000 with the introduction of sulfonamides and penicillin. This far outweighs any other medical advance in the past century.”

  • Armstrong et al. JAMA 1999;6:61ff

  • From 1983 to 2010, FDA approval of new antibiotics has continuously declined, from 4 per year in the early 1980s to less than 1 antibiotic per year now

  • The last class of drugs with a novel mechanism of action against GN bacteria goes back 40 years. A review of drugs currently in trials revealed no such new drugs.

  • For the US, antibiotic resistance is responsible for nearly 100,000 deaths caused by hospital-acquired infections per year at an estimated annual cost of $23 billion.

  • Roberts et al CID 2009;49:1175ff


Why do we see more resistance l.jpg
Why do we see more resistance?

  • Sicker inpatient population

  • Patients chronically ill

  • Larger immunocompromised population

  • More instrumentation/new procedures

  • Presence of devices

  • Increasing resistance in community

  • Emerging pathogens

  • Complacency regarding antibiotics

  • Increased use of (empiric) broad-spectrum antibiotics

  • Ineffective infection control and compliance

  • Crowding of patients in confined areas

  • Decreasing nurse/patient ratio


Why do we see more resistance6 l.jpg
Why do we see more resistance?

  • Sicker inpatient population

  • Patients chronically ill

  • Larger immunocompromised population

  • More instrumentation/new procedures

  • Presence of devices

  • Increasing resistance in community

  • Emerging pathogens (Superbugs!)

  • Complacency regarding antibiotics

  • Increased use of (empiric) broad-spectrum antibiotics

  • Ineffective infection control and compliance

  • Crowding of patients in confined areas

  • Decreasing nurse/patient ratio


My patient is really ill l.jpg
My patient is really ill…

  • What is the price of prescribing a little more than needed if I do not want to think that hard?

  • Healthcare dollars (irrelevant, if title true)

  • C. difficile (potentially deadly)

  • Side effects (potentially deadly)

  • Resistance (relevant?)


Getting it right bloodstream infections l.jpg
Getting It RightBloodstream Infections

% Mortality


Getting it right ventilator associated pneumonia l.jpg
Getting It RightVentilator-associated Pneumonia

% Mortality

It is a lot more difficult to get it right if the bacteria are multi-drug resistant


Scope of the problem l.jpg
Scope of the problem

  • Nosocomial infections > 8 million excess hospital days

  • Approximately 80,000 deaths

  • >75% resistant to at least one drug class

  • > 50% of inpatients receive antibiotics

  • 30-50% of these receive them inappropriately

  • Cost of res. pathogens 100 million - 30 billion US$/year

  • Phelps Med Care 1989



The gram negative cell wall l.jpg
The Gram Negative Cell Wall

Efflux system

Porin channels

B-lactamases

PBPs

Adapted from Livermore and Woodford, Trends in Microbiol, 2006.


Bush classification of lactamases in gn bacteria l.jpg
Bush classification of β-lactamases in GN bacteria


Slide14 l.jpg

Substrate Profile

  • Penicillinase

  • Cephalosporinase

  • Broad spectrum

  • Extended broad spectrum

  • Carbapenemase


Slide15 l.jpg

Substrate Profile

  • Penicillinase

  • Cephalosporinase

  • Broad spectrum

  • Extended broad spectrum

  • Carbapenemase


Slide16 l.jpg

19 Months ESBL Klebsiella pneumoniae Outbreak New York Hospital Medical Center of Queens

  • 432 ceftazidime-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae

  • 155 patients colonized (61%) or infected (39%)

  • 53% crude mortality rate

  • Not detected for 12 months!

Meyer et al. Ann. Int. Med. 119: 353-358 1993


Slide17 l.jpg

Substrate Profile Hospital Medical Center of Queens

  • Penicillinase

  • Cephalosporinase

  • Broad spectrum

  • Extended broad spectrum

  • Carbapenemase


Is klebsiella bad l.jpg
Is Hospital Medical Center of QueensKlebsiella bad?

It depends!

Most Klebsiella infections are easy to deal with, but some are worse than others

Because the host is bad?!

Because the bug is bad?!

Because the drugs are bad?!


Susceptibility profile of kpc producing k pneumoniae l.jpg
Susceptibility Profile of KPC-Producing Hospital Medical Center of QueensK. pneumoniae


Slide20 l.jpg

Drugs with Most Reliable Activity Against Hospital Medical Center of Queens

ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae

  • Carbapenems

  • (Cephamycins)

  • (Fluoroquinolones)


Carbapenem resistance mechanisms l.jpg
Carbapenem Resistance: Mechanisms Hospital Medical Center of Queens


Carbapenemases l.jpg
Carbapenemases Hospital Medical Center of Queens


Carbapenemases in the u s l.jpg
Carbapenemases in the U.S. Hospital Medical Center of Queens


K lebsiella p neumoniae c arbapenemase l.jpg
K Hospital Medical Center of Queenslebsiella Pneumoniae Carbapenemase

  • KPC is a class A b-lactamase

    • Confers resistance to all b-lactams including extended-spectrum cephalosporins and carbapenems

  • Occurs in Enterobacteriaceae

    • Most commonly in Klebsiella pneumoniae

    • Also reported in: K. oxytoca, Citrobacter freundii, Enterobacter spp., Escherichia coli, Salmonella spp., Serratia spp.,

  • Also reported in Pseudomonas aeruginosa (Columbia, thankfully we are talking the country, not us!)


Susceptibility profile of kpc producing k pneumoniae25 l.jpg
Susceptibility Profile of KPC-Producing Hospital Medical Center of QueensK. pneumoniae


Kpc enzymes l.jpg
KPC Enzymes Hospital Medical Center of Queens

  • Located on plasmids; conjugative and nonconjugative

  • blaKPC is usually flanked by transposon sequences

  • blaKPC reported on plasmids with:

    • Normal spectrum b-lactamases

    • Extended spectrum b-lactamases

    • Aminoglycoside resistance


Slide27 l.jpg

Geographical Distribution of KPC-Producers Hospital Medical Center of Queens

Frequent Occurrence

Sporadic Isolate(s)


Kpc outside of united states l.jpg
KPC Outside of United States Hospital Medical Center of Queens

  • France (Nass et al. 2005. AAC 49:4423-4424)

  • Singapore (report from survey)

  • Puerto Rico (ICAAC 2007)

  • Columbia (Villegas et al. 2006. AAC 50:2880-2882 & ICAAC 07)

  • Brazil (ICAAC 2007)

  • Israel (Navon-Venezia et al. 2006. AAC 50:3098-3101)

  • China (Wei Z, et al. 2007. AAC 51: 763-765)


Slide29 l.jpg

Inter-Institutional & Inter-State Spread of KPC-Producing Hospital Medical Center of QueensK. pneumoniae


Carbapenemase producing enteric gnr u k l.jpg
Carbapenemase Hospital Medical Center of Queens – Producing Enteric GNR; U.K.

< 10% susceptible to usual Rx

>40% resistant to tigecycline, >90% susceptible to colistin


Ndm1 carbapenemase l.jpg
NDM1 Carbapenemase Hospital Medical Center of Queens

  • First described from India 2008

  • Novel resistance mechanism

  • Gene compatible with multiple types of plasmids- greatly enhances global spread

  • Already in California, Illinois and Mass.

  • Some strains sensitive to only polymyxins (highly neuro and nephro-toxic) or Tigecycline

  • No new drugs close to release


Phenotypic tests for carbapenemase activity l.jpg
Phenotypic Tests for Carbapenemase Activity Hospital Medical Center of Queens

  • Modified Hodge Test

    • 100% sensitivity in detecting KPC; also positive when other carbapenemases are present

    • 100% specificity

Procedure described by Lee et al. CMI, 7, 88-102. 2001.


New transmission mechanisms l.jpg
New transmission mechanisms Hospital Medical Center of Queens

  • NDM-1: 77 cases in 13 European countries

    • 60% from England

    • Travel to India (including medical tourism)

  • ESBLs

    • Travellers diarrhea

    • Foodborne outbreak

    • Adoption


Slide34 l.jpg


Slide35 l.jpg

  • 156 pts affected Thailand)

  • 35% of kitchen surfaces colonized

  • 6 of 44 (14%) of food workers fecal carriers

  • 2 y.o. from China

  • Adopted

  • Secondary transmission in family


Modified hodge test l.jpg
Modified Hodge Test Thailand)

Lawn of E. coli ATCC 25922

1:10 dilution of a

0.5 McFarland suspension

Test isolates

Imipenem disk

Described by Lee et al. CMI, 7, 88-102. 2001.



Resistance in gram positive organisms l.jpg
Resistance in gram-positive organisms Thailand)

  • 1990 1997 2000

  • PRSP 4% 30-50% 48%

  • VTSP < 0.2% 3.6-5.1%

  • MRSA 20-25% 25-50%

  • GISA 0 <0.1 <0.1

  • VRE <0.1 15 21


Evolution of e faecium resistance l.jpg

Evolution of E. faecium resistance

  • MIC90 of E. faecium

  • 1968 1969-88 1989-90

  • Penicillin 8 64 512

  • Ampicillin 2 32 128

  • % VRE 0 0 61%

Grayson et al, AAC


Why is this different l.jpg
Why is this different? distinguished from hospital acquired strains by the presence of:

  • Outbreaks in new populations

  • Different disease spectrum (boils, CAP)

  • Spider bite history

  • Specific clones

  • SCCmec type IV

  • Panton-Valentine Leukocidin (PVL)

  • Susceptible to many antibiotics


Populations with ca mrsa l.jpg

Children distinguished from hospital acquired strains by the presence of:

Inmates

Military recruits

Native populations

MSM

HIV+ patients

Religious communities

Football teams

Wrestlers

Gymnasts

Fencing teams

IDU

Homeless

Populations with ca-MRSA


Slide43 l.jpg

Clinically Relevant CA-MRSA Disease distinguished from hospital acquired strains by the presence of:(GA/MD/MN n=1,674, 78%)

Fridkin et al. NEJM, 2005


Mrsa skin infection differential diagnosis l.jpg
MRSA skin infection: differential diagnosis distinguished from hospital acquired strains by the presence of:

  • Common misdiagnosis: “spider bite”, complete with history of having been bitten!


Range of the brown recluse l.jpg
Range of the brown recluse distinguished from hospital acquired strains by the presence of:


D j vu l.jpg
déjà vu distinguished from hospital acquired strains by the presence of:


Slide47 l.jpg

déjà vu II distinguished from hospital acquired strains by the presence of:

  • Phage type 80/81: PCN-R clone of SA

  • Neonatal outbreaks in Australia in 50’s

  • Became pandemic in adults/children

  • in hospitals/communities

  • Highly transmissible and virulent

  • Carried leukocidin

  • Robinson et al

  • Phage type 80/81 carried PVL

  • MLST 30

  • Current SWP clone of CA-MRSA

  • descendant – acquired SCC IV


Slide48 l.jpg

Okuma et al. J Clin Micro 2002 distinguished from hospital acquired strains by the presence of:


Distribution of virulence and resistance determinants ca mrsa france switzerland usa oceania l.jpg
Distribution of Virulence and Resistance Determinants distinguished from hospital acquired strains by the presence of:CA-MRSA (France, Switzerland, USA, Oceania)

Vandenesch et al. EID Aug 2003


Pvl associated with severe disease l.jpg
PVL associated with severe disease distinguished from hospital acquired strains by the presence of:

  • Necrotizing pneumonias

  • Septic syndrome

  • Empyema

  • Most CA-MRSA strains PVL +

    • Causal role in severe disease presentations is not proven


Centers for disease control campaign 12 steps to prevent antimicrobial resistance l.jpg
Centers for Disease Control Campaign distinguished from hospital acquired strains by the presence of:12 steps to prevent antimicrobial resistance

  • Prevent Infection

  • Vaccinate

  • Remove catheters

  • Diagnose and Treat Effectively

  • Target the pathogen

  • Access the experts

  • Use Antimicrobials Wisely

  • Practice antimicrobial control

  • Use local data

  • Treat infection, not colonization

  • Know when to say no to vancomycin

  • Stop treatment when infection is cured or unlikely

  • Prevent transmission

  • Isolate the pathogen

  • Brake the chain of contagion


How to prevent resistance l.jpg
How To Prevent Resistance distinguished from hospital acquired strains by the presence of:

  • Adequate infection control

  • Appropriate use of antibiotics


Strategies for managing outbreaks of resistance l.jpg

Lack of association distinguished from hospital acquired strains by the presence of:

of resistance with a

plasmid mechanism

Plasmid-mediated

mechanism

Polyclonal

epidemiology

Favors clonal or

oligoclonal epidemiology

Amenable to strict

infection control procedures

Necessitates antibiotic

restriction before

significant reduction in

resistance occurs

Strategies for Managing Outbreaks of Resistance

Ahmad M et al. Clin Infect Dis 1999;29:352-355


Optimal use of antimicrobial it s role in preventing resistance l.jpg
Optimal Use of Antimicrobial: distinguished from hospital acquired strains by the presence of:It’s Role in Preventing Resistance

  • Will optimal use, including control of antibiotic use, prevent or slow the emergence of resistance?

    • “It is unlikely that the resistance problem will rapidly wane, simply by being more prudent in our use of antimicrobial agents; on the other hand, it is certain that if we do not cut back on the use of these agents, the resistance problem will worsen.”

    • Williams Science 1998;279:1153


What to do to slow antibiotic resistance l.jpg
What to do to slow antibiotic resistance distinguished from hospital acquired strains by the presence of:

  • Aggressively attack misuse

  • Animal feeds and “treatment” of inanimate objects

  • Upper respiratory tract infection

  • • Colds

  • • Sinusitis

  • • Pharyngitis

  • • Bronchitis - acute

  • Fever without evidence of bacterial infections

  • • ICUs

  • • Children

  • • Chronic care facilities


Appropriate use of antibiotics l.jpg
Appropriate Use of Antibiotics distinguished from hospital acquired strains by the presence of:

  • The appropriate empiric treatment for the patient with

  • Sneezococcus congestii

  • Coughobacillus snifficile

  • is Tylenol, decongestants and antitussives not antibiotics

  • If the patient is really sick and may have pneumonia with

  • Tyrannococcus rex or other superbugs

  • you may want to consider Bumfacillin or Gorillamycin


Shea and idsa recommendation for hospitals l.jpg
SHEA and IDSA distinguished from hospital acquired strains by the presence of:Recommendation for Hospitals

  • Implementation of a system for periodic monitoring of antimicrobial resistance in community and nosocomial isolates

  • Implementation of a system for periodic monitoring of antibiotic use according to hospital location and/or prescribing service

  • Monitoring of relationship between antibiotic use and resistance, assignment of responsibility through practice guidelines or other institutional policies

  • Application of contact isolation precautions in patients known or suspected to be colonized or infected with epidemiologically important microorganisms


Can we win the global battle l.jpg
Can we win the global battle? distinguished from hospital acquired strains by the presence of:

  • Keep on developing new antibiotics

  • Surprise your opponent (combination, rotation)

  • Use the optimal dose of the right antibiotic

  • for the appropriate duration of therapy

  • Know as much about antibiotics as your ID folks

  • alternatively call them to help you


Double coverage l.jpg
Double coverage? distinguished from hospital acquired strains by the presence of:

  • Reasonable data for some gram-positives

  • No good data for gram-negatives

  • May still be reasonableto cover 2 organisms and in specific situations

  • Double coverage across the board will result in increased financial burden, resistance, drug-associated morbidity, and potentially antagonism


Slide62 l.jpg

Synergy vs. antagonism distinguished from hospital acquired strains by the presence of:

1 + 1 = 3 vs. 1 + 1 = 0

=

=


Can we win the global battle63 l.jpg
Can we win the global battle? distinguished from hospital acquired strains by the presence of:

  • Keep on developing new antibiotics

  • Surprise your opponent (combination, rotation)

  • Use the optimal dose of the right antibiotic for the appropriate duration of therapy

  • Know as much about antibiotics as your ID folks, alternatively call them to help you


Know antibiotic principles l.jpg
Know Antibiotic Principles! distinguished from hospital acquired strains by the presence of:

  • Drug levels and activity

  • Volume of distribution (Obesity, third spacing)

  • Compartments

  • Protein binding

  • Time vs. concentration-dependant killing

  • >MIC > 50% DI vs. Cmax/MIC >8-10

  • Aminoglycosides and quinolones

  • Combining drugs

  • Synergy vs. antagonism


You have homefield advantage use it l.jpg
You have homefield advantage – use it distinguished from hospital acquired strains by the presence of:


Empiric therapy l.jpg
Empiric Therapy distinguished from hospital acquired strains by the presence of:

  • Empiric therapy is not an educated guess but a

  • sophisticated decision based on intimate knowledge of

  • The bug

  • The host

  • The local environment

  • All available options

  • • Antimicrobials

  • • Principles of antimicrobial therapy

  • • Supportive and critical care


Take home l.jpg
Take home distinguished from hospital acquired strains by the presence of:

  • Empiric therapy is overrated

  • Diagnostic effort is underrated

  • Consider going narrow (may be diagnostic)

  • Your empiric therapy will save some, not save some (if you do not get it right), or in some cases kill someone


ad