1 / 8

How Much is Location Privacy Worth?

How Much is Location Privacy Worth?. George Danezis, Stephen Lewis and Ross Anderson Cambridge University. Location Privacy. Location data on people collected by mobile phones etc (cell, triangulation, GPS,…) Supplied to employers, police and others – dreams of ‘m-commerce’

marin
Download Presentation

How Much is Location Privacy Worth?

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. How Much is Location Privacy Worth? George Danezis, Stephen Lewis and Ross Anderson Cambridge University

  2. Location Privacy • Location data on people collected by mobile phones etc (cell, triangulation, GPS,…) • Supplied to employers, police and others – dreams of ‘m-commerce’ • Some horror stories of affairs being discovered etc • But technical privacy proposals, such as home proxies, haven’t taken off • How much do people value their location privacy?

  3. Experimental Design • Asked 300 CS undergrads to bid to participate in location study • Their mobile phone location would be collected for 28 days • We’d invite the N students with the lowest bids • 3rd year students, at least, should understand auction incentive-compatibility • Didn’t say we just wanted valuation; cleared this with ethics procedures

  4. Amounts Bid • 3 bid £0, and peaks at £1, £5, £10, £20 • Nine bid above £30 (highest was £400) • Median was £10, mean was £27.40 • 74 people filled out the full form

  5. Correlations • People who travel out of town at least once a week have a higher median bid • Mann-Whitney U test significant at 5% • Also a longer tail on the distribution

  6. Correlations (2) • Students who use their mobile phone to communicate with a partner have a longer tailed distribution • Difference in medians not significant though

  7. Second Pass • Told students of commercial interest in data • Invited revised bids • The median bid doubled • Yet over half chose not to revise

  8. Conclusions • Stated preferences for location privacy are as one might expect from other stated privacy studies plus social intuition • It remains to be seen if the gulf between stated and revealed preferences is as large here as elsewhere (but why not?!) • What’s novel is our methodology – using a second-price auction to elicit truth

More Related