1 / 12

max-success.eu

Mobility M anagement and U rban P lanning in EU N ew M ember S tates Aljaž Plevnik, Urban Planning Institute, Ljubljana, Slovenia Luka Mladenovič, Urban Planning Institute, Ljubljana, Slovenia Aleksandra Faron , Cracow UT, Poland Kristina Jauneikaite, Vilnius Gediminas TU, Lithuania.

mariko
Download Presentation

max-success.eu

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Mobility Management and Urban Planning in EU New Member StatesAljaž Plevnik, Urban Planning Institute, Ljubljana, SloveniaLuka Mladenovič, Urban Planning Institute, Ljubljana, Slovenia Aleksandra Faron, Cracow UT, Poland Kristina Jauneikaite, Vilnius Gediminas TU, Lithuania

  2. www.max-success.eu

  3. WP D - Integrating Planning and Mobility Management • Land-use planning process presents opportunities to implement MM in new and expanding sites as well as through land use policy. • WP D considers existing experience from member states in using the planning system in this way, • WP D will produce guidance to further stimulate the links between planning and MM.

  4. WPD’s workingsteps • State of the art review • Analysis & cross-national comparison • Planning simulation workshops • Recommendations & guidelines • Final conference in Cracow, September 2009

  5. Analysis in 10 countries, 3 NMS (LI, PL, SI) How far is sustainable transport an objective of the planning policy? How is MM integrated in the building permission process? What are opportunities and the scope for further integration?

  6. Ljubljana – Slovenia Rožna dolina: new university campus Vilnius – Lithuania VELGA: multi-use site (shopping, offices, residential) Cracow – Poland Czyżyny-Dąbie: exhibition & conference centre Planning simulation workshops: 3 of 5 in NMS

  7. RESULTS – Framework conditions Source: EC, 2007

  8. RESULTS – Framework conditions in NMS • little recognition of sustainable transport as objective of planning system (sometimes recognised but rarely put into practice), • functional disintegration between transport and land-use planning, • SUTP and MM are relatively unknown concepts, BUT • transport related problems – demand for new solutions, • EU projects stimulus for policy transfer.

  9. RESULTS – LUP and building permission process in NMS • fast changing planning systems, • weak planning vs. development pressure, • local plans as poor basis for integration • accessability with sustainable modes mostly neglected, • non-transport factors most important criteria for decision, • many existing planning instruments offer possibilities for integration (e.g. environmental or transport impact assessments, parking standards), • main barrieres - awareness and political willingness.

  10. CONCLUSIONS • unfavourable preconditions but increasing demand for new solutions due to transport problems, • ad-hoc (pilot) improvements can be done immediately, • difficult systematical improvements, • need for an EU project on MM with a focus on NMS specifics.

  11. First examples of integration in NMS emerging • Ljubljana, SI • Admin centre • 5,7 ha, • 70.000 m2, • 2500 parkings

More Related