1 / 28

Bachelor/Master system at Utrecht University

Bachelor/Master system at Utrecht University. Professor Hans van Himbergen Vice-rector International Educational Affairs Utrecht University, the Netherlands 7 April 2003. The Netherlands. Utrecht. 400 km. PhD. master 1-2 years. bachelor 3 years years. HBO. bachelor 3 years.

Download Presentation

Bachelor/Master system at Utrecht University

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Bachelor/Master system at Utrecht University Professor Hans van Himbergen Vice-rector International Educational Affairs Utrecht University, the Netherlands 7 April 2003

  2. The Netherlands

  3. Utrecht 400 km

  4. PhD master 1-2 years bachelor 3 years years HBO bachelor 3 years bachelor 4 years MBO 4 years Appren ticeship training VWO HAVO 3 years VMBO VBO 2 years 1 year 1 year Basic general secondary education 3 years Primary education (age 4-12) 8 years University Dutch Educational System

  5. Utrecht University • Type Research university • Founded 1636 • Bachelor programmes 48 • Master programmes 195 • Research schools 21 • Top research schools 4 • PhD theses 390 • Staff (fte) 5.593 • Students 22.400 • PhD students 920 • Budget (US$) 550.000.000 • 75% public

  6. Why change our academic education (1)? • Number of students has grown dramatically since the mid seventies • Student’s talents, interests and ambitions are diverse and not settled when they enter the university • Long discussions about success rates (with government) and suitability (with ‘employers’) of education • Previous efforts Dutch government: reform = cost containment universities without much regard for educational demands • Previous efforts UU: differentiation leads towards more different tracks, not towards flexibility for students • Both general academic and research skills call for interactive capabilities in an inter/multidisciplinary setting

  7. Increase in students 1950 -2000(the Netherlands)

  8. Succes rate students(Utrecht University)

  9. % graduated per year after enrollment(Utrecht University)

  10. Why change our academic education (2)? • Cater to the interest in international experience among students, both our own and from abroad • Need to maintain/increase the international profile of the university’s research activities • Shortage of potential students in some fields • Need to attract enough young academic potential in an internationally competitive environment

  11. Old wine in new bottles? With the introduction of the Bachelor/Master system, Utrecht University is seizing the opportunity to implement real innovation in its education. Key characteristics: • Bachelor’s degree programme allows students considerable individual freedom of choice and emphasises general academic skills • Focus on the mutual commitment of students and the University • Intensive academic counselling • Wide choice of research- or profession-oriented Master’s degree programmes (including programmes taught in English)

  12. Two phases, each with its own set of objectives Bachelor’s degree programme • Academic skills (regardless of specific content) • Gradual focus on a more specific/discipline-oriented interest • Clarification of possible career ambitions Master’s degree programme Specialisation with a view to: • Scientific research • Professional career at academic level

  13. Two phases, each with its own teaching model The Bachelor’s degree programme focuses on expression and development of the student’s talent, interest and ambition: • Restricted choice within context of the Major • Unrestricted choice in optional course profile The Master’s degree programme is mainly expertise-driven • Programmes with UU profile • Restricted admission • Tailored to employment profiles

  14. Structure of Bachelor’s degree programme • Major(main subject, up to 75% of programme) • Compulsory Major course modules • Optional Major course modules • Optional course profile(at least 25% of programme) • Chosen from entire range of courses offered by Utrecht University • Either additional course modules within the Major • Or course modules outside the Major that match the student’s ambitions and interests • Or a Minor

  15. Total 180 ECTS (90 - )135 ECTS Major (department) Discipline - related subjects standard 105 ECTS Max. 75 ECTS uniform for all major students, - 65 ECTS discipline related optional courses approx. 30 ECTS Academic theories and methodologies Max. 15 ECTS compulsory, min. 7.5 ECTS at level 2 or 3 At least 45 ECTS Optional course profile ( student) Min. 15 ECTS at level 2, if Minor at least 7.5 ECTS at level 3 Academic development portfolio Bachelor degree requirements At least 45 ECTS at level 3

  16. External Flux out Flux in Bachelor Master degree from highschool degree Years Optional course profile Scheme of bachelor - master flux in 1 2 3 4 5 = ‘ 17

  17. Teaching: the old situation • In spite of a single student records system (OSIRIS), students were unable to access information about courses in other departments • 8 different timetables, many different course lengths and starting dates • Enormous differences in weighting of course modules • Tendency for departments to downgrade credits awarded by other departments

  18. University-wide teaching framework • Uniform academic year with four teaching periods, starting around 1 Sept, 15 Nov, 1 Feb and 15 April. • Standard size of course modules: 7.5 ECTS • Bachelor course modules at 3 levels: (1) Introductory, (2) Intermediate, (3) Advanced • Prerequisites formulated for all course modules • All Bachelor course modules listed in online University Course Catalogue • Standardised enrolment procedure for all course modules

  19. Internal budget and funding policy • Budget • One single rate for teaching • Financing based on duration of programme: • Bachelor 3 years • Master 1 or 2 years • Reduction of effects of delays • Funding • Simple, effective funding of courses • Funding of academic counselling

  20. Undergraduate – Graduate – Research/PhD Division of responsibilities for • Undergraduate phase (Majors and academic development) • Graduate phase (programme and admission of students to Master’s degree programmes) • Research and PhD programme The Dean decides how much time each employee devotes to: • Undergraduate teaching • Graduate teaching • Research and PhD programme

  21. Undergraduate programme: roles and responsibilities The University Provides context for and monitors: • Educational framework • Level and nature of academic development • Quality and quality control • Induction of first-year students • Academic counselling Certifies: • Course modules • Majors • Minors

  22. Undergraduate programme: roles and responsibilities Deans are responsible for: • Commissioning departments to provide teaching and approving Major/Minor requirements • Ensuring the quality of the teaching staff

  23. Undergraduate programme: roles and responsibilities Departments are responsible for: • The induction and academic counselling of Major students • Offering course modules for Major students • Offering a curriculum for academic development • Determining compulsory component of Majors • Offering any course modules for non-Major students • Stipulating what constitutes a Minor within their field of competence • Awarding Bachelor’s degrees in accordance with university requirements • Arranging quality control

  24. Undergraduate programme: roles and responsibilities Teaching staff are responsible for: • Participating in the general counselling activities of their department, including the induction of first-year students • Developing course modules in such a way that students who take part in accordance with the indicated guidelines can pass the module • Teaching the course modules as described • Stating sufficiently clearly in the course module descriptions what is required to pass the module • Offering students adequate guidance both within and outside timetabled activities • Notifying students of their final mark within two weeks of the end of any course module

  25. Undergraduate programme: roles and responsibilities Students are responsible for: • Enrolling at the department of their initial choice of Major • Establishing their definitive choice of Major within a year • Choosing undergraduate subjects that will best equip them for their choice of graduate programme • Enrolling in course modules and actively participating in coursework and assessment

  26. Graduate programme: roles and responsibilities The Graduate School is responsible for • Supervising students (including with regard to future careers) • Offering degree programmes that will lead to Master’s degrees • Defining the admission criteria • Selecting students • Arranging quality control

  27. Graduate programme: roles and responsibilities The deans (one or more) are responsible for: • Determining departmental capacity for programmes • Setting final degree requirements • Ensuring quality of teaching staff • Ensuring students are adequately informed about options within the graduate programme • Arranging external accreditation The University is responsible for: • Certifying the programmes • Certifying the admission procedures • Ensuring there is adequate departmental capacity

  28. Messages to the Chilean rectors: • Universities should take the lead when considering major changes in higher education • Cherish the ambitions of your prospective students, rather than your own notions of what a ‘programme of education’ should look like • Involve all essential parties from the outset in the process of designing any major changes • Make parties responsible for those parts of the educational process that they can really control; don’t hold them accountable for parts of the process that they cannot directly influence.

More Related