1 / 48

Chapter 7: The Landscape of Memory: Mental Images, Maps, and Propositions

Chapter 7: The Landscape of Memory: Mental Images, Maps, and Propositions. Some Questions of Interest. What are some of the major hypotheses regarding how knowledge is represented in the mind?

maribeth
Download Presentation

Chapter 7: The Landscape of Memory: Mental Images, Maps, and Propositions

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Chapter 7: The Landscape of Memory: Mental Images, Maps, and Propositions

  2. Some Questions of Interest • What are some of the major hypotheses regarding how knowledge is represented in the mind? • What are some of the characteristics of mental imagery? How does knowledge representation benefit from both images and propositions? • How may conceptual knowledge and expectancies influence the way we use images?

  3. 3 ways the brain creates meaning

  4. Mental Representations:Pictures vs. Words • Pictures • concrete and spatial information • analogous to what they represent • Words • abstract and categorical information • symbolic of what they represent

  5. Mental Imagery • Internal representation of items that are not currently being sensed • May involve any of the sensory modalities • Imagine a taste, a sight, a touch • Individual differences in creating and manipulating mental images • Use of mental images can help to improve memory

  6. Dual-Code TheoryPaivio (1971) • We use two codes to represent information • Analogue (pictorial) codes • Symbolic (verbal) codes • Two codes are linked

  7. Visual Codes Processed Differently from Symbolic Codes • Each type of code is affected by different manipulations • Visual interferes with spatial • Verbal interfere with spoken • Sequence matters more for words, not so much for images

  8. Evidence for Dual-Code Theory • Brooks (1968) • One group saw a block diagram of a letter • Memorized it • Were asked to mentally travel the letter and indicate if the corner was on the extreme top or bottom Start

  9. Evidence for Dual-Code Theory • Brooks (1968) • Second group saw a sentence • Memorized it • Were asked to classify each word as a noun by indicating “yes” or “no” • Verbal task A bird in the hand is not in the bush

  10. Evidence for Dual-Code Theory • Brooks (1968) • Participants were then asked to respond in one of two ways • Say “Yes” or “No” • Point to the answer “Yes or No” Why was this important? Yes No No Yes Yes No Yes No Yes No No Yes

  11. Evidence for Dual-Code Theory: Interference! For image task, RT was slower when pointing For the symbolic task, RT was slower for the verbal response Different pattern = different processing for different codes

  12. Evidence for Dual-Code Theory Participants answered questions about word or picture pairs

  13. Longer RT to answer the size question about the word pairs.

  14. Propositional Theory • Do not store in form of images • Instead have a “generic” code that is called “propositional” • Store the meaning of the concept • Create a verbal or visual code by transforming the propositional code

  15. Propositional Representations

  16. Limits of mental images…

  17. Test Your Visual Imagery Ability!

  18. 1 2 3 4

  19. Try Again with Another Design

  20. 1 2 3 4

  21. Now try it with this figure…

  22. Ambiguous figures • People were unable to discover a second interpretation from the image • Then drew the figure and could find the other interpretation • A propositional code may override the imaginalcode

  23. Labels matter, too… Hourglass or table Sun or ship’s wheel

  24. Results • Participants were asked to draw items seen • Participants distorted the images to fit the labels • This pattern supports the idea that images may be stored propositionally, not as original analog image

  25. Mental Imagery Studies • Functional-Equivalency Hypothesis • Mental images are internal representations that operate in a way that is analogous to the functioning of the perception of physical objects

  26. Mental Imagery • Shepard & Metzler (1971) • Participants had to decide whether displays had two similar shapes • Some pairs were similar, but rotated to various degrees

  27. Shepard & Metzler (1971) ResultsUsing single-cell recordings in the motor cortex, there is physiological evidence that monkeys can do mental rotations

  28. Neuroscience and Functional Equivalence • Activation in the frontal and parietal regions occurs when viewing or imagining an image • No overlap in the areas associated with vision • Schizophrenics have difficulty differentiating between internal images and perception of external stimuli

  29. AI and Spatial Ability video • What information is essential for navigating in ones environment? • What form might this spatial information take? • What information would a robot need to navigate in an environment and would this differ from what a human would need? • How do animals do it? • rats, bees, and pigeons?

  30. Image Scaling • Does the rabbit have whiskers? • Does the rabbit have ears? • Does the rabbit have a beak? • Reaction time to answer is measured

  31. Results • It took longer to respond to rabbits paired with elephants than to rabbits paired with flies

  32. Image scaling • Asked college students and fourth-graders simple questions about animals • Does a cat have claws? • Does a cat have a head? • Varied the type of instructions • Imagery vs no imagery

  33. Results • In imagery condition • questions were answered faster if the attribute was larger • In no imagery condition • questions were answered faster based on distinctiveness of characteristic for the animal, no impact of size

  34. Size Judgments • Which is larger, moose or roach? • Which is larger, wolf or lion? • The closer in size, the longer the reaction time

  35. Map drawing activity • West acres mall • Red river zoo • Island park • City of Fargo • City of Moorhead • State of North Dakota • State of Minnesota

  36. Image Scanning • Kosslyn (1983) • Memorize map • Later asked to scan image • Manipulate distance between items in scan • Hut to grasses • Lake to hut • Measure reaction time

  37. Results • support for functional-equivalence hypothesis • Linear relationship between the distance to scan and actual reaction time of participants • Mental images are internal representations that operate in a way that is analogous to the functioning of the perception of physical objects

  38. Demand Characteristics • Major criticisms of Kosslyn’s research • Pylyshyn • Only one code, propositional • Results due to task demands • Instructions imply some necessary relationship between the physical distance and time required

  39. Demand Characteristics & Mental Scanning • Participants give the experimenters the pattern they expect • Intons-Peterson replicated research but misled experimenters • If experimenter expectations are part of demand characteristics, then leading participants to believe that longer distances would lead to faster responses should alter the results • Evidence supported demand characteristics idea

  40. Demand Characteristics & Mental Scanning • Jolicoeur & Kosslyn (1985) • Created a false demand characteristic for a U-shaped function for participants • Proposed that Gestalt principle of proximity makes close points “hard,” and distant points would also take longer • No experimental expectancy effect found • Supported idea that image is being used

  41. Johnson-Laird (1983) • Proposed there are three types of mental representations • Propositional representations are pieces of information resembling natural language • Mental imagery are perceptual models from a particular point of view • Mental models are structural analogies of the world

  42. Characteristics of a Mental Model • A representation of a described situation rather than a representation of a text itself or the propositions conveyed by a text • The structure corresponds to the functional relations among entities as they would exist in the world • A simulation of events in the world, either real or imaginary

  43. Evidence for Mental Models • Kerr (1983) • Studied participants who were blind • Created a tactile Kosslyn map study equivalent • Participants had to study the island, given a physical map to touch • Asked the same scanning questions • Found the same pattern of results—longer distances, longer reaction times

  44. Visual Imagery & Spatial Imagery • Visual imagery (images are visual) • Seeing colors • Comparing shapes • Spatial imagery (analog spatial format) • Rotating objects • Aiming and shooting at a target

  45. Neuroscience Evidence • Farah (1988) • Brain injury case study (L.H.) • Gave some visual tasks • Color identification, object naming • Gave some imagery tasks • Mental rotation, mental scanning • Poor visual image skill • Normal spatial image skill Thus, both types of imagery must exist

  46. In Sum, Researchers Have Proposed • Evidence for analog codes • Evidence for propositional codes • Evidence for mental models • Evidence for mental imagery that is spatial • Evidence for mental imagery that is visual

  47. Cognitive Maps • Historically • Tolman – rats • von Frisch – bees • Thorndyke – humans • Gain increased spatial knowledge • Using three types of knowledge • Landmark (special buildings) • Route-road (procedures to get to one place from another) • Survey (global map-like view)

  48. Heuristics Affecting Cognitive Maps • Right-angle bias • Streets are drawn at 90-degree angles • Symmetry heuristic • Irregular geographic boundaries are made regular • Rotation heuristic • Tend to “regularize” tilted landmarks to appropriate E-W or N-S axis • Alignment heuristic • represent landmarks and boundaries as better aligned than they really are • Relative-position heuristic • Relative positions of landmarks and boundaries are distorted in ways consistent with conceptual knowledge

More Related