1 / 30

Transition to Transition : Eastern Europe meets North Africa

Transition to Transition : Eastern Europe meets North Africa. Erik Berglof Leontief Award Ceremony Saint Petersburg February 16, 2013. Sharing of development experiences. Advanced economies imposed their experiences for centuries - with brute force or through “soft power”

mariah
Download Presentation

Transition to Transition : Eastern Europe meets North Africa

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Transition to Transition: Eastern Europe meets North Africa Erik Berglof Leontief Award Ceremony Saint Petersburg February 16, 2013

  2. Sharing of development experiences • Advanced economies imposed their experiences for centuries - with brute force or through “soft power” • Central European countries actively promoted their own experience; “soft power”, but no hidden agenda • Russia expanded its development assistance; soft power in circumference, but little beyond • What can North Africa learn from Eastern Europe – and what can Eastern Europe learn from North Africa? • ..\..\..\..\..\..\..\Program Files\Gapminder Desktop\Gapminder Desktop.exe

  3. European transition experience:Andrei Shleifer’s five lessons • Dramatic output drop in first years of transition • Recovery and rapid growth nearly everywhere • Decline in output did not lead to populist revolts • Economists and policymakers overstated their ability to sequence reforms and importance of particular strategic choices (e.g., privatisations) • Exaggerated benefits of incentives on their own – changes in people also necessary

  4. Main points • Success leads to convergence of systems, but many ways of getting stuck in transition • Egypt today more like Ukraine 2013 than Poland in 1989 or Russia in 1991 • No deep transitional recession - no strong rebound • Many institutions in place – poor business climate • Need outside anchor + “governance-heavy” capital • Uprisings in North Africa may trigger political transition in less democratic Eastern Europe

  5. Outline • What are the transition outcomes to date? • What have we learned about transition? • Where is North African transition today? • Can North Africa learn from Eastern Europe? • Can Eastern Europe learn from North Africa? • Conclusions

  6. 1. What are the outcomes to date?

  7. Successful transition • Many reform trajectories... • Differed in almost any conceivable aspect of reform (privatisation method, bank restructuring, equity markets, foreign bank entry...) • ...but convergence towards one model • ”emerging market form of capitalism” (bank-dominated, concentrated ownership, weak capital markets...)

  8. What explains success in transition? • Policies matter, of course, BUT... • Initial conditions (distance to EU + rule of law) • Outside anchor of EU accession • a prize awarded based on transition progress • the larger the prize, the more certain, the closer in time (Berglof and Roland, 2000) • weaker once inside; clubs-in-clubs can help sustain reform momentum (Berglof et al., 2010 and 2013)

  9. Many ways to get ”stuck in transition” • Non-reformers – old guard hanging on (Turkmenistan, Belarus, Uzbekistan) • ”Failed” states (Tadjikistan, Kyrgyz Republic) • Initial winners of reform captured process (Ukraine) • Resource trap (Kazakhstan) • Middle-income trap? (Tunisia, Egypt) • ¾ of all middle income countries in 1960 were also middle income countries in 2012

  10. 2. What have we learned about transition?

  11. Transition – historical learning process • Conceptual understanding improved • Initial linear notion of reform – turned out differently • Institutions required for markets to function • Private sector critical, but state also essential • Political economy of reform – threat of reversal • Availability of data better • Perceptions shaped by experience: concepts like ”privatisation” and ”liberalisation”, but also ”democracy” have a context and connotation

  12. View of institutional change evolved • Culture, geography and institutions – primacy of institutions (Acemoglu et al., 2001, 2002) • Extractive-productive economic institutions, exclusive-inclusive political institutions (Acemoglu and Robinson, 2012) • Human capital influences success in institutional change (Shleifer, 2012) • Role of institutions depends on stage of technological development (Aghion et al., 2013)

  13. History shapes transition perceptions • Pre-communist patterns influence transition process • eastern Europe backwardness (Berend, 2003) • experience of rule of law in Central Europe • Pale of settlement (Grosfeld, Rodnyansky and Zhuravskaya, 2013) • Habsburg empire (Grosjean, 2012a; Baecker et al. (2012) • World War II(Grosjean, 2012b; Grosfeld and Zhuravskaya, 2013) • Differences among communist systems • Soviet Union vs. rest of Eastern Europe, former Yugoslavia, within SU differences (Baltic states vs. other republics) • Conflicts during transition • affect political trust and legitimacy, slow to change afterwards (Tajik civil war (Grosjean, 2012c)); Ex-Yugoslavia (EBRD, 2006))

  14. 3. Where is North African transition today?

  15. From the EBRD transition indicators to “Assessment of transition challenges” • More transparent, less judgmental • Sector by sector assessments • Benchmark to advanced economies • Indicators aggregate data (limit judgement) • 13 sectors in 34 countries • Small, medium and large challenges

  16. Assessment of transition challenges: Urban transport in Ukraine Two dimensions: Market Structure and Market Institutions 1 Components comprise sub-indicators such as: Degree of corporatisation; Financial, commercial, operational performance; Extent of private sector participation; Degree of tariff levels and setting; Degree of regulatory authority capacity and risks of political interference

  17. ATC heat map

  18. “Transition gaps”: traditional EBRD region and southern Mediterranean countries SEMED region comparable to Caucasus countries, Kazakhstan, and Ukraine. Note: Country averages of 16 sector transition indicator scores in 2012.

  19. North Africa has most institutions • Real sector operates like market economy, BUT • Lack of competition – weak competition policy • Subsidies play important role in many sectors • Business climate among the worst in the world • Corporate governance poorly developed • Financial sector developed, BUT • Banks dominate with rudimentary capital markets • Strong state presence • Funding government, but limited penetration and do not lend to SMEs

  20. Deep differences in demographics and distribution • Demographics fundamentally different • Outlook very different - must grow at 7 per cent just to keep pace with population growth • Pressure on infrastructure (education, transport...) and job creation (EE: ratio of old-to-young growing) • Pockets of poverty + illiteracy; profound exclusion • 80 per cent of women outside labour markets • 50 per cent of youth unemployed (also highly educated)

  21. Main observations • Egypt today not like Poland in 1989 or like Russia in 1991 – more like Ukraine 2013 • Economy not as distorted as in post-socialist countries • North African countries already done many of the transition reforms • Important differences in demographics and distribution (in particular extent of exclusion)

  22. 4. What can North Africa learn from Eastern Europe

  23. Many market reforms implemented • Should not suffer deep transitional recession • But strong post-recession rebound also unlikely – low-hanging fruit already picked • Should escape wide-spread unhappiness due to output shock and shock to human capital • But key reforms like ”privatisation” and ”liberalisation” colored by decades of experience • Growth affected by political uncertainty, but impact should be short-lived, assuming that political transition does not get stuck (not trivial)

  24. Key reform challenges in North Africa • Establishing macroeconomic stability urgent • Scale down subsidies of food and energy • Restructure banking system to support SMEs • Improve competition and break “clientelism” • Reforming business climate the main medium-term challenge • More inclusive growth (women and youth)

  25. What can the outside do? • External anchor critical determinant • Some countries have more anchors (Egypt, Ukraine) • Economic growth in anchor important • Institutional superiority recognised (soft power) • Overcome status quo bias and individual veto players • Marshall Plan - not the answer • Problem one of micro institutions (and short-term financial instability), not macro-economic demand shock and reconstruction after World War II • Egypt needs ”governance-heavy” investment (and ”governance-light” short-term financial support)

  26. What can EBRD do in North Africa? • Existence of banking system helps roll out key products (SME, energy and water efficiency, trade credit) • Bring transition experience from Eastern Europe – at sectoral level • Create transparency around foreign direct investment and municipal infrastructure • Provide support to building legal framework and corporate governance • Help manage political risk for investors

  27. 4. What can Eastern Europe learn from North Africa

  28. From North Africa to Eastern Europe • ”Authoritarian bargain” – lack of voice in exchange for political stability + economic security (Desai et al, 2009) • North Africa really about political transition - political transition much more varied than economic transition • Could ”Jasmine revolution” spread to Eastern Europe? • Political islam have elements of populism (what reformers feared in early transition) • Response to the distributional consequences and a failure to create meaningful jobs for young people (and women) • Education and healthcare – could a further collapse in Eastern Europe trigger similar counter-reactions?

  29. 5. Conclusions

  30. Transferring transition treachorous, but suggestive... • Successful transition fosters convergence, but many ways to get stuck in transition • Pre-transition history shapes transition perceptions • ”Egypt 2013 - more like Ukraine 2013 than Poland in 1989 or Ukraine in 1991” • External anchors help break out of ”transition traps” • ”Marshall Plan” not the solution – need “governance-heavy” capital (like EBRD) • Can popular uprisings in North Africa provoke political transition in less democratic parts of Eastern Europe?

More Related