1 / 30

# Welcome back to Physics 211 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Welcome back to Physics 211. Today’s agenda: Announcements Relative motion Tomorrow’s workshop: Kinematics in context (Review). Reminder. Homework this week: Tutorial HW Motion in two dimensions p. 19 - 22. (due in Wed workshop) MPHW2 homework due 12:00 pm Friday. Exam 1 on Thursday!.

I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.

## PowerPoint Slideshow about ' Welcome back to Physics 211' - margaret-greene

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript

### Welcome back to Physics 211

Today’s agenda:

Announcements

Relative motion

Tomorrow’s workshop:

Kinematics in context (Review)

• Homework this week:

• Tutorial HW Motion in two dimensionsp. 19 - 22. (due in Wed workshop)

• MPHW2 homework due 12:00 pm Friday.

• Seating arrangement by last name will be posted outside Stolkin Auditorium by Thursday morning.

• Calculators and rulers may be helpful. Closed book– only my formula summary

• Practice exams/solns (also HW1,2) online: http://www.phy.syr.edu/courses/PHY211

### Relative motion

• Consider 1D motion of some object

• Observer at origin of coordinate system measures pair of numbers (x,t)

• (observer) + coordinate system + clock called frame of reference

• (x,t) not unique – different choice of origin changes x (no unique clock ..)

• Physical laws involve velocities and accelerations which only depend on Dx

• Clearly any frame of reference (FOR) with different origin will measure same Dx, v, a etc

Inertial Frames of Reference

• Actually can widen definition of FOR to include coordinate systems moving at constant velocity

• Now different frames will perceive velocities differently ….

• Accelerations ?

• Often convenient to associate a frame of reference with a moving object.

• Can then talk about how some physical event would be viewed by an observer associated with the moving object.

### Reference frame (clock, meterstick) carried along by moving object

B

A

A

B

A

B

A

• From point of view of A, car B moves to right. We say velocity of B relative to A, vBA. Here vBA>0

• But from point of view of B, car A moves to left. In fact, vAB<0

• In fact, can see that

vAB=-vBA

### demo with two carts

Camera on one cart gives observations from moving frame

Galilean transformation

t

vAB

P

vABt

xA

xB

• xPA=xPB-vABt --- transformation coords

• D xPA/Dt=D xPB/ Dt –vAB

vPA=vPB –vAB --- transformation of velocities

• Notice:

• vAB=-vBA follows

• Two objects a and b moving with respect to say Earth then find (Pa, Ab, BE)

vab=vaE-vbE

You are driving East on I-90 at a constant 65 miles per hour. You are passing another car that is going at a constant 60 miles per hour. In your frame of reference (i.e., as measured relative to your car), is the other car

1. going East at constant speed

2. going West at constant speed,

3. going East and slowing down,

4. going West and speeding up.

Conclusion hour. You are passing another car that is going at a constant 60 miles per hour.

• If we want to use (inertial) moving FOR then velocities are not same in different frames

• However constant velocity motions are always seen as constant velocity

• There is a simple way to relate velocities measured by different frames.

Why bother ? 1. hour. You are passing another car that is going at a constant 60 miles per hour.

• Why want to use moving frames ?

• Can simplify motions

Dropping a ball from moving cart hour. You are passing another car that is going at a constant 60 miles per hour.

• Show demo with camera on cart.

• Film on FOR will be shown and discussed in workshop Friday.

Relative Motion 2D hour. You are passing another car that is going at a constant 60 miles per hour.

• Motion may look quite different in different FOR, eg. dropping ball from moving cart

complicated!

Cart frame

Earth frame

simple!

Motion of cart

Why bother ? 2. hour. You are passing another car that is going at a constant 60 miles per hour.

• Have no way in principle of knowing whether any given frame is at rest

• Stolkin is NOT at rest (as we have been assuming!)

Whats more … hour. You are passing another car that is going at a constant 60 miles per hour.

• Better hope that the laws of physics don’t depend on the velocity of my FOR (as long as it is inertial …)

• Elevate to Principle of relativity POR – respected by Newton’s mechanics (accelerations …)

Einstein hour. You are passing another car that is going at a constant 60 miles per hour.

• Elevated this principle to cover all of physics – not just mechanics

• Eg – electricity and magnetism – seemed to violate POR using Galilean transformation

• Fix ? – change transformations to make POR consistent with E and M!

• Profound consequences …..

The diagram shows the positions of two carts on parallel tracks at successive instants in time.

Is the average velocity vector of cart B relative to cart A (or, in the reference frame of cart A) in the time interval from 1 to 2…?

1. to the right

2. to the left

3. zero

4. unable to decide

Is the instantaneous tracks at successive instants in time.velocity vector of cart B relative to cart A (or, in the reference frame of cart A) at instant 3…?

1. to the right

2. to the left

3. zero

4. unable to decide

Accelerations ? tracks at successive instants in time.

• Seen that different (observers) FOR perceive different velocities

• Is there something which they do agree on ?

• Previous example: cart and Earth observer agree on acceleration (time to fall)

Is the average tracks at successive instants in time.acceleration vector of cart B relative to cart A (or, in the reference frame of cart A) in the time interval from 1 to 5:

1. to the right

2. to the left

3. zero

4. unable to decide

If car A moves with tracks at successive instants in time.constant velocity relative to the road,

then the acceleration of any other object (e.g., car B) measured relative to car Ais the same as the acceleration measured relative to the road.

Acceleration is same for all inertial FOR! tracks at successive instants in time.

• We have:

vPA=vPB –vAB

For velocity of P measured in frame A in terms of

velocity measured in B

• D vPA/Dt= D vPB/ Dt since vAB is constant

• Thus acceleration measured in A or B frame is same!

Physical Laws tracks at successive instants in time.

• Since all FOR agree on the acceleration of object they all agree on the forces that act on that object

• All such FOR equally good for discovering the laws of mechanics

Two spaceships and a shuttle tracks at successive instants in time.

A

B

t=0

A

B

S

t=T

S

From B’s frame ?

What is velocity of shuttle in B’s frame ?