1 / 40

Success With Response to Intervention at the High School Level

Success With Response to Intervention at the High School Level. Farmington High School March 9, 2012. Following Along. Wikispaces : http://fhsrti.wikispaces.com/. Welcome & Introductions. Ben Kusch, Principal Kristin Scherman, Secondary Literacy Coach Kari Simonson, Reading Specialist

marcy
Download Presentation

Success With Response to Intervention at the High School Level

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Success With Response to Intervention at the High School Level Farmington High School March 9, 2012

  2. Following Along • Wikispaces: • http://fhsrti.wikispaces.com/

  3. Welcome & Introductions Ben Kusch, Principal Kristin Scherman, Secondary Literacy Coach Kari Simonson, Reading Specialist Sara Byers-Platt, Reading Specialist Theresa Agerter, Assistant Principal

  4. About Us • Farmington High School • Enrollment • Demographics • Recent History

  5. Session Overview & Goals: Response to Intervention (RtI) Theory RtI in a Secondary Literacy Context Data Collection and Progress Monitoring Role of Common Formative Assessments Role of Collaboration Role of Purposeful Adult Action and Supervision

  6. RtI Overview • What is your current level of understanding in regards to RtI? • “I’ve heard of it, but not much else.” • “I know a little bit about it, but need to learn more” • “I am in the early implementation stages of an RtI initiative/program” • “I am actively implementing an RtI program/initiative in my organization and am curious about what others are doing”

  7. RtI Overview • What is your current level of understanding in regards to RtI? • “I’ve heard of it, but not much else.” • “I know a little bit about it, but need to learn more” • “I am in the early implementation stages of an RtI initiative/program” • “I am actively implementing an RtI program/initiative in my organization and am curious about what others are doing”

  8. RtI Overview • What is your current level of understanding in regards to RtI? • “I’ve heard of it, but not much else.” • “I know a little bit about it, but need to learn more” • “I am in the early implementation stages of an RtI initiative/program” • “I am actively implementing an RtI program/initiative in my organization and am curious about what others are doing”

  9. RtI Overview • What is your current level of understanding in regards to RtI? • “I’ve heard of it, but not much else.” • “I know a little bit about it, but need to learn more” • “I am in the early implementation stages of an RtI initiative/program” • “I am actively implementing an RtI program/initiative in my organization and am curious about what others are doing”

  10. RtI Overview • What is your current level of understanding in regards to RtI? • “I’ve heard of it, but not much else.” • “I know a little bit about it, but need to learn more” • “I am in the early implementation stages of an RtI initiative/program” • “I am actively implementing an RtI program/initiative in my organization and am curious about what others are doing”

  11. “Typical” RtI Model

  12. Initial RtI Model—FHS

  13. Background Information New High Stakes Accountability Underperforming Students Lack of a Cohesive Plan Growing Concern

  14. Planning Ahead • Literacy Interventions for Adolescent (High School) Readers • What Research Says • Use of Data • Entrance and Exit Criteria • The Necessity of “And”

  15. Planning Ahead • 4 Main Objectives of an Effective Assessment Plan : • Screening • Progress Monitoring • Diagnosis • Evaluation

  16. Planning Ahead • Beliefs Around Reading Intervention: • Multiple Data Measures • No Silver Bullet • Variability • Relationships

  17. National Reading Panel Berrignger et al. 2006

  18. What Came Next: • A Different Approach to Intervention • Variability of Need • With a Scalpel, not a Chainsaw

  19. Class Structure: Refined 66 Min. in addition to a regular English Class

  20. Class Structure 66 Min. in addition to a regular English Class 22 minutes

  21. Class Structure 66 Min. in addition to a regular English Class 22 Minutes

  22. Mini-Lessons: Vocabulary • Root Trees • Thinking about patterns in words • Morphemes: Roots, Prefixes, Suffixes: Identifying them in words to decode and attach meaning • Word Mapping • Word Diary work These strategies give students the ability to attach meaning to unknown words without having to use a dictionary, or worse…skip the word.

  23. Mini-Lesson: Comprehension • Active Reading Strategies • Question • Evaluate/Comment • Connect • Review/Clarify • Predict • Visualize • Respond Beers, Kylene. When Kids Can’t Read: What Teachers Can Do.Portmouth: Heinemann, 2003. Print. Literature: The Reader’s Choice. New York: Glenco/McGraw-Hill, 2002. Print

  24. Class Structure 66 Min. in addition to a regular English Class 22 minutes

  25. Class Structure: Mini Lesson 66 Min. in addition to a regular English Class

  26. National Reading Panel Berrignger et al. 2006

  27. Engagement +Motivation= Success • Connecting kids to books through: fix for outline idea • Extensive classroom library • Showing book trailers • Proximity to media center • Relationships with students • Encourage students to take ownership for their test scores. • Target their areas of need: assist in ownership. • Help them realize that reading is for everyone. • Celebrate growth

  28. Success: • Kids are reading: some outside of class • Students are passing the GRAD test • All seniors scheduled in to classes have passed the test. • Last senior to pass last year made the B honor- roll in college first semester.

  29. Study Findings

  30. Study Findings

  31. Study Findings MAZE Slope Mann Whitney U, p=.27; d=.35 TOSCRF Change Mann Whitney U, p=.003*; d=.89 (M. Burns, 2011)

  32. New/Latest Data From Kari and Sara to look at hard data and Anecdotal analysis.

  33. Reflecting: • What’s Working • It’s Spreading • Teaching Others • Student Learning and Achievement

  34. Reflecting : • In Progress • Entrance / Exit Criteria • Resources • Teacher / Student Scheduling • Challenges with the “And, not Or” • What’s next?

  35. Farmington Guide to Reading Intervention (6-12)

  36. In Summary. . . . • What’s Next?: • Continued work and professional development • Tier I • Tier II • Blending of Tier II and III • Interplay of Mainstream and Special Education • Beyond Remediation • Progress Monitoring

  37. Contact Information • Ben Kusch • bkusch@farmington.k12.mn.us • Kristin Scherman • kscherman@farmington.k12.mn.us • Kari Simonson • ksimonson@farmington.k12.mn.us • Sara Byers-Platt • sbyers@farmington.k12.mn.us • Theresa Agerter • tagerter@farmington.k12.mn.us

More Related