1 / 11

Introduction to the aff

Introduction to the aff. Casey Parsons. Review. The aff defends a plan text, which must be topical – in other words, it has to fall under the resolution The aff gives reasons why the world where the plan happens is better than the world where the plan doesn’t

Download Presentation

Introduction to the aff

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Introduction to the aff Casey Parsons

  2. Review • The aff defends a plan text, which must be topical – in other words, it has to fall under the resolution • The aff gives reasons why the world where the plan happens is better than the world where the plan doesn’t • The aff has fiat – we assume that the actor at least attempts to implement the plan

  3. Stock Issues • The aff has to win five arguments to win the round • If the aff loses any of these arguments then they automatically lose the round • These are called stock issues, which are: • Inherency • Harms • Significance • Solvency • Topicality

  4. Inherency • Something is preventing the plan from happening in the status quo • Essentially barriers to the passage of the plan • Possible Examples: • Political opposition • A lack of funding • A lack of interest • There’s also advantage inherency – this is what prevents your harms from being solved in the status quo

  5. Harms • These are the problems with the status quo that justify doing the plan • Possible Examples: • The economy doing poorly now • Inefficient trade • Global Warming

  6. Significance • This is a little more tricky – it’s essentially why we care about the problems with the status quo. Most policy debaters call this the “impact” • Possible examples: • Economic decline • Local conflicts escalating • Nuclear War • Extinction

  7. Solvency • There are two accepted “kinds” of solvency • Plan solvency, which says that the plan would be successful and is possible • Advantage solvency, which says that doing the plan resolves the harms that you isolated

  8. Topicality • We already discussed this a little bit – topicality is essentially arguing that defending the plan is the same as defending the resolution • The aff doesn’t usually explicitly say this in the first affirmative constructive speech – Topicality is not an issue unless the negative makes it one

  9. Structuring an aff case • An aff case is usually composed of: • An inherency contention where the aff isolates why the plan won’t happen in the squo • A solvency contention where the aff isolates that the plan will work • 2-3 advantages that make the aff a good idea. The harms, significance, and advantage solvency are embedded within the advantages

  10. Structuring an advantage • The advantage tells us a story of what happens when we don’t do the plan. Let’s consider the highway example used previously. One possible advantage could be the economy: • Harms: The economy is in decline now • Impact: Continued economic decline leads to global conflict • Solvency: Investing in highways boosts trade efficiency and reverses economic decline • This is incredibly simplified, but you get the idea

  11. Example Case Outline • Plan text: The USFG should invest $100 billion into a modernized highway system in the United States • Contention One: Inherency • Contention Two: Solvency • Contention Three: Advantages • Advantage One: The Economy • Advantage Two: The Environment

More Related