1 / 21

Summary of LU tests at 88” cyclotron 19-20 Oct 2014

This document provides a summary of the LU tests conducted at the 8" cyclotron on 19-20 Oct 2014 during the IPHC-LBL phone meeting. The tests were done with heavy ions and protons, and the results show thousands of LU events at over-current thresholds, as well as hiccups in LU recovery. Damage to thin sensors was observed at higher thresholds, while a thick sensor was damaged at a threshold above 1.4 A.

manuall
Download Presentation

Summary of LU tests at 88” cyclotron 19-20 Oct 2014

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Summary of LU tests at 88” cyclotron 19-20 Oct 2014 IPHC-LBL phone meeting 2014-12-04 Giacomo Contin, Leo Greiner, Jo Schambach, Michal Szelezniak

  2. Test conditions • 28 hrs scheduled with heavy ions • October 19, 8:00 – October 20, 12:00 • Total exposure time ~10 hrs + ~40 min for IPHC • Ne LET = 3.49 , Ar LET = 9.74 MeV/(mg/cm2) • 8 hrs scheduled with protons • 6 hrs of beam time  2 hrs of exposure • 50 MeV protons IPHC-LBL phone meeting - 2014_12_04 MS

  3. Overview of heavy ion latch-up Data corrected for stuck latch-up reset and reset associated dead time IPHC-LBL phone meeting - 2014_12_04 MS

  4. Latch-up count per run • Thousands of LU events at over-current thresholds < 1A • Thin sensors are damaged at thresholds >1 A above the operating current IPHC-LBL phone meeting - 2014_12_04 MS

  5. Hiccups in LU recovery Sensor 1 (50m high-res epi) Th = 1.5 A Stuck LU reset Occasionally, after LU recovery, 550 mA (vs 220 mA) (220 mA is for VDD chip + PCB buffers) Sensor 2 (50m high-res epi) Th = 1.0 A Sensor 2 (50m high-res epi) unrecoverable IPHC-LBL phone meeting - 2014_12_04 MS

  6. Hiccups in LU recovery Sensor 3 (70m low-res epi) High current after some LU recoveries Th = 1.6 A Th = 2.0 A Sensor 4 (70m high-res epi) Th = 1.4 A IPHC-LBL phone meeting - 2014_12_04 MS

  7. Study of current-limited latch-up • Analysis procedure (plots 1-4) • Raw data • Raw data with rising and falling slopes removed • Rising slope: (AvgN:N+20- IN >10 mA) and (IN+20-AvgN:N+20 > 10 mA) • Falling slope: (AvgN:N+20- IN+20 >10 mA) and (IN-AvgN:N+20 > 10 mA) • Histogram of the remaining plateaus • Plateau: average of current samples between slopes • Histogram of the differences between consecutive plateaus ( P(n) – P(n-1)) IPHC-LBL phone meeting - 2014_12_04 MS

  8. Current-limited LU, sensor 1, threshold @ 400 mA Current increase by ~300 mA IPHC-LBL phone meeting - 2014_12_04 MS

  9. Current-limited LU, sensor 1, threshold @ 800 mA Current increase by ~300 mA and by ~500 mA IPHC-LBL phone meeting - 2014_12_04 MS

  10. Current-limited latch-up Sensor 1 For individual runs there appears to be a preference for current-limited latch-up states at +300 mA and + 500 mA Sensor 2 Histograms of current increases in all runs for each sensor are more complex Sensor 3 A more refined analysis may be needed Sensor 4 IPHC-LBL phone meeting - 2014_12_04 MS

  11. Protons Ladder 900 mA until it breaks in run 16 Sensor current increases from 220 to 800 mA in run 14 IPHC-LBL phone meeting - 2014_12_04 MS

  12. Baseline current consumption ladder sensor Beam on Beam on IPHC-LBL phone meeting - 2014_12_04 MS

  13. Proton run data examples Ladder, threshold 760 mA Ladder, threshold 2 A Unrecoverable latch Stuck latch Sensor, threshold 560 mA Sensor, threshold 1400 mA Ladder reset Did not recover Incomplete recovery? IPHC-LBL phone meeting - 2014_12_04 MS

  14. Summary * Still activated and not released from the BASE facility IPHC-LBL phone meeting - 2014_12_04 MS

  15. Observations • Thousands of non-destructive LU events at overcurrent thresholds < 1A • Hiccups in LU recovery (stuck latch, high power states) => power reset too short? • There appears to be a higher cross-section for current-limited latch-up states at +300 mA and + 500 mA • Heavy ion induced LU damaged thin sensors (threshold ~1A) but not the thick ones • Protons damaged a thick sensor at threshold > 1.4 A (but low statistics) • Threshold current needed for LU-induced damage (?) • PXL ladders in STAR damaged at 800 mA + ~400 mA => total current ~1.2 A • Thin sensors in LU tests damaged at 220 mA + ~1000 mA => total current ~1.2 A IPHC-LBL phone meeting - 2014_12_04 MS

  16. IPHC-LBL phone meeting - 2014_12_04 MS

  17. IPHC test structures • Testing time: 2 hrs • Total exposure time: 40 min • Ag LET = 48.15 MeV/(mg/cm2) • Woj’s test structure (TOWER): • Exposure of 2 sensors (thick and thin) at the same time • Test setup limitation: LU in one sensor triggers power and SYNC reset, LU in the second sensor triggers only power reset IPHC-LBL phone meeting - 2014_12_04 MS

  18. Very preliminary results VDD: ~1.7 V ~1.3 V ~2.2 V IPHC-LBL phone meeting - 2014_12_04 MS

  19. Current monitoring (consistent with chip 1) IPHC-LBL phone meeting - 2014_12_04 MS

  20. Current measurements High current states? Too many latch-ups? IPHC-LBL phone meeting - 2014_12_04 MS

  21. Summary • Current measurements are consistent with LU count in chip 1 • Not finished: • LU count and dead-time corrections (very important for structures that did not register any latch-up) • Extracting from the accumulated data current measurements for chip 2 • LU cross-section for the standard P-well/N-well spacing (0.86 m) and no deep P-well @ 48 MeV/(mg/cm2) ~610-6 cm2 • Phase-1 @ ~37 MeV /(mg/cm2) 110-3 cm2 • Mimosa26 @ ~25 MeV /(mg/cm2) 210-3 cm2 • Ultimate-1 @ 10 MeV /(mg/cm2) 210-5 cm2 • It appears that structures without the deep P-well are more sensitive to latch-up • Should we plan LU tests for other sensors fabricated by TOWER? IPHC-LBL phone meeting - 2014_12_04 MS

More Related