1 / 41

PROPOSED BURNTHROUGH TEST METHOD CALIBRATION GUIDELINES

PROPOSED BURNTHROUGH TEST METHOD CALIBRATION GUIDELINES. Objective of Testing:. Establish Similar Calibration Procedure. Produce Similar Exposure From Burner. Achieve Similar Test Results. Factors That Can Influence Calibration. Air Intake Velocity. Air Intake Temperature.

manon
Download Presentation

PROPOSED BURNTHROUGH TEST METHOD CALIBRATION GUIDELINES

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. PROPOSED BURNTHROUGH TEST METHOD CALIBRATION GUIDELINES

  2. Objective of Testing: • Establish Similar Calibration Procedure • Produce Similar Exposure From Burner • Achieve Similar Test Results

  3. Factors That Can Influence Calibration • Air Intake Velocity • Air Intake Temperature • Fuel Flowrate • Fuel Temperature • Instrumentation (type/size of thermocouple, calorimeter type) • Other Adjustments (position of igniters, static disc, tabs) • Environmental Conditions (relative humidity, barometric pressure) • Fuel Type (Jet A, Diesel, Fuel Oil)

  4. Individual Calibration Rigs

  5. Protective Heat Shield for Burner Components

  6. Protective Heat Shield for Burner Components

  7. Conditioned Intake Air

  8. Conditioned Intake Air

  9. Intake Airbox

  10. Intake Airbox Mounted to Burner

  11. Fuel Temperature

  12. Intake Airbox Holding Air Velocity Meter

  13. Measurement of Intake Air and Fuel Temperature

  14. Temperature Rake Using 1/8” Closed Bead Thermocouples

  15. Factory Mounted Static Disc

  16. Static Disc Mounted to Igniter Assembly

  17. Temperature Profile Bias

  18. Use of Deflection Tabs at Draft Tube End

  19. Effect of Tab Positioning on Temperature Air Velocity = 2000 ft/min Igniters @ 6:00 Average Temp = 1912oF Result: Low on ends, too hot in middle Air Velocity = 2000 ft/min Igniters @ 6:00 Average Temp = 1927oF Result: Too hot in middle Air Velocity = 2000 ft/min Igniters @ 6:00 Average Temp = 1890oF Result: Low on ends, too hot in middle

  20. Effect of Tab Positioning on Temperature Air Velocity = 2000 ft/min Igniters @ 6:00 Average Temp = 1957oF Result: Low on ends, too hot in middle Air Velocity = 1900 ft/min Igniters @ 6:00 Average Temp = 1951oF Result: Low on ends, too hot in middle Air Velocity = 2000 ft/min Igniters @ 9:00 Average Temp = 1860oF Result: All temperatures in range

  21. Location of Flame Enhancement Tab

  22. Day 1 Temperature Calibration @ Various Air Velocity Settings Air Velocity = 1900 ft/min Igniters @ 9:00 Average Temp = 1846oF Result: All temperatures in range Air Velocity = 2000 ft/min Igniters @ 9:00 Average Temp = 1860oF Result: All temperatures in range Air Velocity = 2100 ft/min Igniters @ 9:00 Average Temp = 1882oF Result: All temperatures in range Air Velocity = 2200 ft/min Igniters @ 9:00 Average Temp = 1896oF Result: All temperatures in range

  23. Day 2 Temperature Calibration @ Various Air Velocity Settings Air Velocity = 2000 ft/min Igniters @ 9:00 Average Temp = 1826oF Result: All temperatures in range Air Velocity = 2100 ft/min Igniters @ 9:00 Average Temp = 1832oF Result: All temperatures in range Air Velocity = 2200 ft/min Igniters @ 9:00 Average Temp = 1864oF Result: All temperatures in range

  24. Day 3 Temperature Calibration @ Various Air Velocity Settings Air Velocity = 1900 ft/min Igniters @ 9:00 Average Temp = 1863oF Result: All temperatures in range Air Velocity = 2000 ft/min Igniters @ 9:00 Average Temp = 1887oF Result: All temperatures in range Air Velocity = 2100 ft/min Igniters @ 9:00 Average Temp = 1913oF Result: Middle temperatures slightly high

  25. Day 1 Heat Flux Calibration @ Various Air Velocity Settings Date: 11/17/99

  26. Day 2 Heat Flux Calibration @ Various Air Velocity Settings Date: 11/18/99

  27. Day 3 Heat Flux Calibration @ Various Air Velocity Settings Date: 11/19/99

  28. Date: 11/23/99

  29. Date: 11/24/99

  30. Latest Calibration Procedure Adjust Fuel Flowrate to 6.0 gal/hr Adjust Burner Intake Air Velocity to 2200 ft/min Temperature: (1850oF +/- 100oF) • After 2-minute warm-up, swing burner into position, • allow 1 minute stabilization, • take reading for 30 seconds (once per second) and average, • swing burner away from flame Heat Flux: (15.2 Btu/ft2 sec +/- 0.8 Btu/ft2 sec) • After 2-minute warm-up, swing burner into position, • allow 1 minute stabilization, • take reading for 30 seconds (once per second) and average, • swing burner away from flame

  31. Calibration Tests Using Aluminum Skin

  32. Round Robin Burnthrough TestingMaterial Selection • Quick-Failing Material (< 1 minute) • Long Duration Passing Material (> 5 minutes) • 1-2 Minute Material Combination • 2-3 Minute Material Combination

  33. Round Robin Burnthrough Testing Purpose To identify problems encountered during calibration of test equipment to ensure similarity between labs To prove similarity of test equipment through testing of identical samples Cataloguing Method for Identifying Materials Ins Thickness (in) - Ins Density (lb/ft3) - Ins Type - Add Barrier - Film - Weight Class (Thickness) FG=Fiberglass OPF=Oxidized Polyacrylonitrile Fiber PAN=Polyacrylonitrile Fiber RPI=Rigid Polyimide Foam NEX=Nextel Ceramic Paper FOP=Felted OPF NQZ=Needled Quartz CFS=Carbon Fiber Skrim 60=0.60 42=0.42 34=0.34 PET1=class 1 polyethylene terepthalate PVF2=class 2 polyvinyl fluoride PI=polyimide FC=fluoropolymer composite Example: 2-42-FG-NEX-PET-1

  34. Burnthrough Round Robin Test Results (Imaginary)

  35. FAATC - Tim Marker CEAT - Anne Mansuet Darchem Flare - Darren Dodd CTA - Anna Villate Boeing - Hank Lutz Daimler Chrysler - Bernd Menken Johns Manville - Becky Wulliman 3M - Tom Tompkins Mexmil - Dave Indyke Accufleet - Jim Davis Akro Fireguard - George Danker International Aero - John Brooks No Fire - Sam Gottfried Orcon - Sherm Smith 3M - Tom Tompkins Johns Manville - Becky Wulliman Mexmil - Dave Indyke Osaka Gas - Yo Ishikawa Inspec Foams - Dan Trahan Schneller - Dale Onderak Facile - Paul Harencak Lamart - Dave Shields Jeheir - Jacques Maillard Burnthrough Test Method Round Robin Task GroupTest Facilities Material Suppliers

More Related