1 / 36

Remediation schemes to mitigate the impacts of abandoned mines

This presentation explores the approach to remediation in England and Wales through three case studies. It discusses the drivers for remediation, remedial strategies, and future drivers. The presentation highlights the advantages and disadvantages of active treatment, passive treatment, and prevention/control of discharge. It also examines case studies of active treatment at the Wheal Jane mine and the feasibility of passive treatment as a long-term solution. Additionally, it discusses the prevention and control of discharges through encapsulation of mining waste and the remediation scheme at Greenside Mine in Cumbria.

manes
Download Presentation

Remediation schemes to mitigate the impacts of abandoned mines

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Remediation schemes to mitigate the impacts of abandoned mines Brian Bone Environment Agency for England and Wales

  2. Presentation aims & content • “To illustrate the approach to remediation in England & Wales through 3 case studies” • Remediation drivers • Remedial strategy case studies: • active treatment of minewater • passive treatment of minewater • stabilisation of tailings • Conclusions

  3. Key drivers for remediation of abandoned mines • EU Dangerous Substances Directive - requires consented discharges for all sites abandoned after 1981 where the minewater contains listed substances • EU Groundwater Directive - requires consented discharges from mine waste where leachate contains listed substances • UK Contaminated Land Regulations - requires remedial action where a significant pollutant linkage is identified

  4. Future drivers • EU Water Framework Directive - consolidates a number of directives, including the dangerous Substances and Groundwater Directives. Environmental objectives will need to be set for ALL water bodies in terms of chemical and ecological quality. • Future EU Mining Wastes Directive - will require exchange of technical information on best available techniques with a view to developing methods to identify and remedy “closed waste facilities”

  5. Remedial strategies • Single or combination of options to prevent pollution and/or treat, selected from: • active treatment • passive treatment • prevention & control of discharge • Each approach is highlighted by a case study

  6. Active treatment • Advantages • Track record & available expertise • Process control • Consistent effluent quality • Disadvantages • Cost (op & cap) • Sludge disposal • Energy consumption

  7. Wheal Jane Incident • Tin/zinc mine in Cornwall • closed early 1990s after 100s-1000s years mining • in 1 year minewater rapidly recovered following closure • temporary pump and treat scheme set up in Nov 1991 • Jan 1992 sudden release of 50,000m3 of water and sediment containing large quantities of Fe, As, Cu, Cd and Zn into the Fal estuary

  8. Wheal Jane

  9. Drivers & objectives for remediation • EU Dangerous Substances Directive - applies to mines abandoned after 1981 • Minimise the polluting effects of minewater discharges from Wheal Jane • Monitor changes in water quality and the effects on the aquatic environment • Determine the most cost-effective long-term remediation strategy for Wheal Jane

  10. Impact of Treatment - Wheal Jane

  11. Active treatment system • Designed to treat 350 l/s (average 200 l/s) • Lime-dosing with sludge recirculation • Pre-settlement sludge density design of 20% w/w solids • Metals removal to satisfy discharge consent to local stream • Three key stages

  12. Stage 2 Stage 1

  13. Active treatment system - summary • State-of-the-art active treatment plant commissioned in 2000, cost £20M to build and operate for 10 years • High density sludge system is very successful, solid content of 50% w/w achieved in tailings dam • Tertiary filters & presses not needed - saving £1.7M • 1st 22 months of operation >12 Mcu.m of water treated and >3200te of metals removed (overall removal efficiency 99.2%)

  14. Passive treatment • Advantages • Low maintenance • Aesthetically pleasing • Sustainable? • Disadvantages • Large land take • Lack of process control • Relatively new (track record) • Cost (capital)?

  15. Objectives of Wheal Jane pilot passive treatment • Examine the feasibility of passive treatment as a long-term solution for Wheal Jane minewater • develop an understanding of the key geochemical and microbiological processes • model the system to aid design of a permanent system for Wheal Jane and elsewhere

  16. Wheal Jane: passive treatment site

  17. Aerobic cells

  18. Wheal Jane passive treatment plant: anaerobic cell Anaerobic cell

  19. Rock filters

  20. Passive system - conclusions • The conclusion that Wheal Jane drainage could not be treated with passive technology was tested. • Further multidisciplinary studies have been carried out to understand the processes involved in passive treatment systems • The studies indicate that a passive system could be redesigned to treat Wheal Jane drainage • Proposal to establish an international research centre at Wheal Jane passive site

  21. Prevention and control of discharges • Encapsulation of mining waste • Advantages • Track record of civil engineering approaches • Low maintenance • Disadvantages • Surface area limits • Durability

  22. Greenside Mine, Cumbria

  23. Remediation Scheme (1) • Objective - to prevent mobilisation of contaminated tailings from a collapsed dam • Control infiltration • run-off into dam • groundwater flow into dam • infiltration through surface • Reduce gradient • regrade slope • retaining walls

  24. Remediation Scheme (2) • Stabilise retaining structures • walls • underpin revetments • Stabilise soil • geosynthetic pre-seeded matting

  25. August 2003

  26. Summary • Case studies from two sites were presented, included active and passive treatment of acid minewater and a civil engineering approach to deal with tailings • Minewater treatment cases highlight the need for good planning, including treatability studies to understand key chemical and biological processes • Current and future legislation pose significant challenges to cost-effective remediation in meeting chemical and ecological objectives and disposal of treatment wastes

More Related