Illustrating the grade methodology the cather associated uti case study
This presentation is the property of its rightful owner.
Sponsored Links
1 / 20

Illustrating the GRADE Methodology: The Cather Associated-UTI Case Study PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 109 Views
  • Uploaded on
  • Presentation posted in: General

Illustrating the GRADE Methodology: The Cather Associated-UTI Case Study. Craig A Umscheid, MD, MSCE, FACP Assistant Professor of Medicine and Epidemiology Director, Center for Evidence-based Practice University of Pennsylvania. TEACH Level II Workshop 5 NYAM August 9 th , 2013.

Download Presentation

Illustrating the GRADE Methodology: The Cather Associated-UTI Case Study

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript


Illustrating the grade methodology the cather associated uti case study

Illustrating the GRADE Methodology: The Cather Associated-UTI Case Study

Craig A Umscheid, MD, MSCE, FACP

Assistant Professor of Medicine and Epidemiology

Director, Center for Evidence-based Practice

University of Pennsylvania

TEACH Level II Workshop 5

NYAM

August 9th, 2013


Cdc guideline on preventing cauti

CDC Guideline on Preventing CAUTI

Full guideline at http://www.cdc.gov/hicpac/index.html


Grade working group

GRADE Working Group

Grades of Recommendation Assessment, Development and Evaluation


The grade working group

The GRADE Working Group

Since 2000

Researchers/guideline developers with interest in methodology

Goal to develop one worldwide system of rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations

Clear separation of 2 elements:

Quality of evidence: very low, low, moderate, or high quality

Strength of recommendation: weak or strong

www.GradeWorking-Group.org


Grade uptake

GRADE Uptake

World Health Organization

National Institute Clinical Excellence (NICE)

British Medical Journal

Infectious Disease Society of America

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (HICPAC and ACIP)

American College of Chest Physicians

UpToDate

American College of Physicians

Cochrane Collaboration

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)

Over 20 other major organizations


Example key question in guideline

Example key question in guideline:

Do Texas catheters impact UTI outcomes

differently than Foley catheters?

VS.


Illustrating the grade methodology the cather associated uti case study

Risks and benefits associated with Texas vs. Foley catheters?


Determinants of quality

Determinants of quality

RCTs start high

Observational studies start low

5 factors lower the quality of evidence

3 factors can increase the quality of evidence


Grading the evidence

Grading the Evidence


Overall quality grades

Overall Quality Grades

High

further research is very unlikely to change confidence in the estimate of effect

Moderate

further research is likely to impact confidence in the estimate and may change the estimate

Low

further research is very likely to impact confidence in the estimate and is likely to change the estimate

Very low

any estimate is very uncertain


Grading the evidence for each outcome

Grading the Evidence for Each Outcome


Grading the evidence for each outcome1

Grading the Evidence for Each Outcome

* = CRITICAL OUTCOMES


Grading the evidence for each outcome2

Grading the Evidence for Each Outcome

* = CRITICAL OUTCOMES


Narrative evidence summary

Narrative Evidence Summary

Q2A1. Condom versus indwelling urethral

There was moderate quality evidence to support the use of condom catheters over indwelling urethral catheters in male patients. This was based on decreased risk of symptomatic UTI as well as increased patient satisfaction with condom catheters.


Formulating recommendations

Formulating Recommendations

  • Three key inputs:

    • Values and preferences used to determine the “critical” outcomes

    • Overall GRADE of the evidence for the “critical” outcomes

    • Net benefits, net harms, or trade-offs that result from weighing the "critical" outcomes


Grading the evidence for each outcome3

Grading the Evidence for Each Outcome

* = CRITICAL OUTCOMES


Cdc recommendation scheme

CDC Recommendation Scheme


Recommendation

Recommendation

Example:

Condom catheter drainage should be used in cooperative male patients without urinary retention or bladder outlet obstruction. (Category IA)


Questions

Questions?


  • Login