![]() |
||||
Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only and may not be sold or licensed nor shared on other sites. SlideServe reserves the right to change this policy at anytime.
While downloading, If for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.
1. Berry PlasticsLiner-less Detergent Cap
Team 7
2. About Berry Plastics Leading manufacturer of injection molded packaging in the U.S.
Currently working on new product development around liner-less closures
With the partnership of UD and our sponsor, John Tauber, a new liner-less detergent cap will be designed
3. Problem Definition The current cost of polypropylene is rising causing the cap liners to become more and more expensive
The cost of the liner is now close to 1/3rd of the total cost to make the cap
A new design is needed to eliminate the need for a liner
The design should be as effective and inexpensive as possible
4. Affected Customers Liquid detergent companies, i.e. Clorox
Retail stores, i.e. Walmart
General public
Elderly
Middle aged
Teenagers
5. Problem Specifics Wants
Low Cost
Maximum Seal Time
Aesthetically Pleasing
Easy to Grip
Easy to Close
Simple Design
Constraints
Liner-less Design
Injection Molded
One Piece
Applied Torque
6. Want Weights
7. Gap Size – Area between cap and bottle does not change from current design
Cost - < $60 per 1000 caps
Appendage Thickness – None
Time Until Leak – 1 hr < t < 24hr
Reproducibility of Results - > 90%
Loss of Fluid – 0 mL
Torque Required – t = 35 in-lbs
Metrics and Target Values
8. Metric Weights
9. Benchmark Concepts Solo Cap
Type of seal
Fin seal with bottle
XTRA Cap
Type of seal
Wedge seal to spout
component
10. Benchmark Concepts cont. All Cap
Type of seal
Cap lays flat against bottle land; tight tolerance
Febreze Cap
Type of seal
Wedge seal to bottle
spike
11. Benchmark Cap Leak Testing To determine which concepts work better than others
Tested with actual product (detergent) inside
Caps tightened to 35 in-lbs
Bottles lay flat on their side and checked periodically for leakage
Each benchmark tested twice
12. Leak Test Results From Benchmark Caps
13. Our Concepts Two Vertical Fins
Fray out to touch walls when screwed down
Force from cap walls and plastic fin resilience create seal with both bottle and spout
Problem- Space between outside fins and cap interior is too thin
Mold has a high probability to break over time from stress
14. Our Concepts Cont. Flat Contact
Proven easy and successful
With proper tolerance cap sits flush on bottle top, creating a tight seal
Problem- Tolerance would have to be incredible
Top of bottle would have to be consistently manufactured completely flat
15. Our Concepts Cont. Internal Wedge
Cap tightens to inside wall of spout while screwing down
Allows more surface contact
Allows least amount of liquid to directly reach the seal
Fluid pushes cap against bottle naturally
16. Primary Cap Design
17. Prototype Testing Same testing procedure as before with water
No seal lasted 1 hr.
18. Change in Problem Scope The seal may not be achievable if the bottle was manufactured incorrectly
Changing a spec on the bottle itself may be a cheaper and simpler solution than designing a new cap
Need to show evidence of the bottle being direct cause of failure before changing specs
19. Bottle Testing Tests of current bottles and liner-less caps from Berry Plastics
16 different bottles/16 different caps for a total of 256 tests
Bottles lay flat on
their sides with paper
towel underneath to
observe leakage
20. Bottle Testing cont. Bottles filled with water
for most extreme testing
Caps torqued to 35 in-lbs
using torque meter
Max time limit of 1 hour
Results: 48% success rate
21. Testing Results
22. Bottle Investigation Possible Causes of Failure
Bottle land flatness
Wall thickness
Distance from start of thread to bottle land
23. Correlations More consistent wall thickness promotes a longer seal
Flatter Bottles sealed longer
24. Bottle Manufacturer Reaming process impact:
Wall thickness
Flatness
Land distance to thread
25. New Bottle Testing
26. Leak Investigation
27. Recommendations Implement new bottle specs with old cap design
Wall thickness variability- < 0.020 inches
Flatness- < 0.010 inches
End Lip variability- < 0.005 inches
Manufacturer limitations?
Create a new cap design
Greater wedge angle
Same fin from old cap
Do both
28. Questions/Concerns Thank You