1 / 19

Mark DeMaria , NOAA/NCEP/NHC Robert DeMaria, CIRA/CSU NCAR-CSU Tropical Cyclone Workshop

Application of the Computer Vision Hough Transform for Automated Tropical Cyclone Center-Fixing from Satellite Data . Mark DeMaria , NOAA/NCEP/NHC Robert DeMaria, CIRA/CSU NCAR-CSU Tropical Cyclone Workshop January 8 , 2014 Boulder, CO. Outline.

malise
Download Presentation

Mark DeMaria , NOAA/NCEP/NHC Robert DeMaria, CIRA/CSU NCAR-CSU Tropical Cyclone Workshop

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Application of the Computer Vision Hough Transform for Automated Tropical Cyclone Center-Fixing from Satellite Data Mark DeMaria, NOAA/NCEP/NHC Robert DeMaria, CIRA/CSU NCAR-CSU Tropical Cyclone Workshop January 8, 2014 Boulder, CO

  2. Outline • Tropical cyclone center fixing from satellites • The circular Hough transform • Application to tropical cyclones • Preliminary results • Improvement through multi-spectral analysis

  3. Aircraft Data Availability • Only west Atlantic and around Hawaii have routine aircraft center fixes • Satellite data used subjectively to find centers across the globe • Improvements to accuracy in real-time highly desirable

  4. Center location (fixing) • Center Location = surface center • Center of circulation • Usually close to the lowest sea-level pressure • Visible and IR methods – Dvorak • Eye • Distinct and inferred center with shear pattern and low-level clouds • Spiral bands and curved cloud lines • Wedge method • Using animation • Low-level cloud motions • Deep layer cloud motions • Ignore cirrus layer cloud motions • Mid-level centers tilted from surface center • Using microwave images • Thick cirrus clouds in visible and IR images obscure features below, used for center location • Thick cirrus clouds in microwave images are more transparent, and the microwave images may often provide better views of features, for improved center locations • Using 3.9-micrometer images at night • New Day-Night band from VIIRS

  5. Center Location • Nearly all methods subjective • Exception is CIMSS ARCHER method that fits spiral patterns to microwave imagery from LEO satellites • Many more geostationary images than center fixes • Automated methods would allow use of high temporal resolution of IR and visible data

  6. Circular Hough Transform • Hough transform developed for computer vision applications to detect features • Originally developed for lines and edges • Later generalized to shapes • Circular Hough transform applied to accurately detecting centers of breeder reactors • Application to finding tropical cyclone centers

  7. Circular Hough Transformfor case with known radius

  8. Generalization for Unknown Radius • Estimate range of possible radii • Perform CHT for range of test radii • Calculate 2-D accumulation matrix for each test radius • Scale accumulation matrices by radius • Average scaled matrices • Center is point with the most votes or some weighted average around the maximum • Can be generalized to multiple circles • Automated coin identification

  9. Application to TC Center Fixing from IR Data • Apply cold threshold to IR image to isolate cold clouds • Apply edge detection method • Take Laplacian of IR brightness temperature • Apply threshold to |Laplacian| • Perform CHT for a range of radii • 10 to 300 km in 1 km intervals • Use combined accumulation matrix to find the center

  10. Hurricane Katrina Example

  11. Accumulation Matrix for Radii from 45 to 112 Pixels

  12. Tropical Cyclone Cases • Charley 2004 – Very small but intense hurricane • Katrina 2005 – Classic large, intense hurricane • Ericka 2009 – Very disorganized weak tropical cyclone, did not make it to hurricane strength • Earl 2010 – Strong hurricane in higher latitudes • Sandy 2012 – Unusually large but only moderate strength, non-classical hurricane structure • IR images every 6 hr for lifecycle of each storm • 135 images

  13. Eye Detection Examples Katrina 08/25/18 2005 Ericka 09/02/18 2009 Sandy 10/19/18 2012 No Eye Cases Eye Cases Katrina 08/29/00 2005 Earl 09/02/06 2010 Charley 08/13/18 2004

  14. Results • Mean CHT error: 91 km • Storms with eyes: 54 km • Bias X: 6 km • Bias Y: 8.5 km • Bias Explained by Parallax

  15. Results by Storm:

  16. Primary Error Sources • Sheared storms • Circulation center displaced from cold cloud shield • Storms with eyes • Radii on scale of outer cloud shield gets more “votes” than radii on the eye scale

  17. Tropical Storm Erika X

  18. Eye Center Out-Voted

  19. Next Steps • Accumulation matrices may be useful for eye detection • Multiple solutions for centers • Use CHT from IR data as first guess to visible algorithm • Combine with other information • Shear vector • Microwave imagery, day-night band • Time continuity of displacement

More Related