1 / 12

UNECE – SECOND INTERNATIONAL FORUM ON TRADE FACILITATION GENEVA, 14-15 MAY 2003

UNECE – SECOND INTERNATIONAL FORUM ON TRADE FACILITATION GENEVA, 14-15 MAY 2003. COSTS AND BENEFITS OF TRADE FACILITATION Anthony Kleitz Trade Directorate, OECD. I. OBJECTIVE OF THIS PRESENTATION. Understand better the nature and importance of trade facilitation.

maleah
Download Presentation

UNECE – SECOND INTERNATIONAL FORUM ON TRADE FACILITATION GENEVA, 14-15 MAY 2003

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. UNECE – SECOND INTERNATIONAL FORUM ON TRADE FACILITATION GENEVA, 14-15 MAY 2003 COSTS AND BENEFITS OF TRADE FACILITATION Anthony Kleitz Trade Directorate, OECD

  2. I. OBJECTIVE OF THIS PRESENTATION • Understand better the nature and importance of trade facilitation. • Focus on a quantitative rather qualitative assessment.

  3. II. DEFINITIONS Trade facilitation (TF) – an imprecise term • WTO: simplification and harmonisation of trade procedures; • Often considered to include other procedural NTBs. Costs and benefits – not the flip side of each other • Trade transaction costs (TTC): what TF aims to reduce; • Implementation costs of TF; • Benefits of TF: come from the reduction of TTC; • Public and private sectors see different costs and benefits.

  4. III. QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS OF COSTS AND BENEFITS OF TF • Challenges: • Inconsistent data on TTC and implementation costs; • No standard methodology for analysis; • Results vary according to parameters and assumptions. • Public and private sectors face different costs and benefits. • Implementation costs for governments - an example of data for automated customs systems: • Chile – $ 5 m.; • Chinese Taipei – $ 5 m. (air-cargo system), $ 6.5 m. (sea-cargo system); • US – overall $ 1 b. (ACE estimate).

  5. Modelling trade and welfare effects: • Overall TTC and benefits of TF: some results • TTC valued by UNCTAD at 7-10% of world trade; • Typically TF estimated to reduce TTC by 1-3% of world trade value, increasing GDP: Estimated Benefits of TF* * Liberalisation assumptions of these studies differ

  6. Quantitative cost indications for particular sectors: Some goods more susceptible to border controls -- e.g. border delays for agricultural products: • Korea – typically 10-18 days for new products (cf. less than 3-4 days for most other agricultural products); • Japan – 1 day more for sea-cargoes subject to other government procedures (e.g. animal and plant quarantine, food sanitary).

  7. 3. Quantitative assessments for particular countries:Customs Service Quality in Relation to GDP Per Capita

  8. CUSTOMS QUALITY BY REGION

  9. OBSERVATIONS ON PERCEIVED QUALITY OF THE CUSTOMS ENVIRONMENT • “Customs service quality” is an average of three survey indicators; • SMEs and developing country firms frequently seen as disadvantaged in meeting TTC and implementation costs; • Positive correlation between income and customs quality; • Yet many examples of low-income countries with good customs services; • Examples of countries with good customs found in all major regions; • Suggests that benefits can be within grasp.

  10. Calculations for particular kinds of costs and benefits: • Administrative costs: Japan MITI estimates feasible reductions of import prices: • 0.5-1.2% for transport machinery; • 1.5-2.4% for other machinery and equipment. • Savings from paperless trading: • estimated 1.5-15% of landed value by Australian DFAT; • 3% average  $60b. savings across APEC. • Time required for customs release.

  11. Average Customs Clearance Time for Imports through trade facilitation (Hours) Source: WTO, OECD, and others

  12. IV. CONCLUDING REMARKS No single answer; work continues. Important to identify key areas where TF may produce greatest benefits. • One size does not fit all; • Importance of a coherent approach to streamlining procedures and improving infrastructure.

More Related