1 / 25

The Nature of γ-ray Source 3EG J2020+4017

The Nature of γ-ray Source 3EG J2020+4017. 陳致維 Chen Chih-Wei. Outline. 1. Gamma-ray telescope 2. Geminga 3. 3EG J2020+4017(2CG078+2, 2EG J2020+4026) 4. RX J2020.2+4026 5. S312 6. Summary. Gamma-ray telescope. 1.position error is large 2.count rate is very slow

makana
Download Presentation

The Nature of γ-ray Source 3EG J2020+4017

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. The Nature of γ-ray Source 3EG J2020+4017 陳致維 Chen Chih-Wei

  2. Outline • 1. Gamma-ray telescope • 2. Geminga • 3. 3EG J2020+4017(2CG078+2, 2EG J2020+4026) • 4. RX J2020.2+4026 • 5. S312 • 6. Summary

  3. Gamma-ray telescope • 1.position error is large • 2.count rate is very slow • 3.EGRET on the CGRO • 4.GLAST: GLAST has a detector area of about one square metre and will detect and locate burst with energies 20-300 MeV within a field of view of 2 steradians.(ref.1)

  4. Geminga • 1.meaning: a. Gamma-ray source in Gemini b. It is not there(ref.1) • 2.period : 273ms(ref.2) • 3.radio quiet (ref.1) : a. radio beam is not intersecting our line of sign: radio beam misaligned with gamma ray beam. b. no radio beam: the properties of the magnetosphere.

  5. 3EG J2020+4017 • 1. gamma ray pulsar properties:(ref.3) a. constant sources on long time scale. b. hard spectra in 100Mev~1Gev. c. energy output is concentrated in gamma-ray band. d. high energy cut-offs at a few GeV

  6. 2EG J2020+4026 Spectrum( ref.4): ~~gamma ray data

  7. 2. Brazier used “evolutionary” method to try to find pulsation in gamma ray data in the range 13.3≧f≧2 , f’ ≦10^(-11) => no pulsation => they thought the proximity of sever other EGRET source weakened it.(2EG J2026+3610,2EG J2019+3719, and 2EG J2033+4112.) (ref.5)

  8. RX J2020.2+4026(ref.5) • 1.ROSAT Data:

  9. 2. single point –like X-ray source within the EGRET 95 per cent confidence box. 3. With total about 140 source counts and a high , complex background, it was not possible to calculate the shape of the source spectrum from existing data.

  10. 4.optical counterparts to RX J2020.2+4023 a. optical spectrum is K0V star b. Fγ/Fx is consistent with the late-type stars c. the association between star “A” and RX J2020.2+4023

  11. Pulsar or other options? • 1. pulsar: did not find pulsation . • 2. diffuse source: hard to explain high energy break. 3. Brazier suggested => a young pulsar.(ref.5)

  12. S312(ref.6)

  13. S312(ref.6) • 1. Chandra data ( observation ID 3856) • 2. counterparts a.USNO-B1.0 position (optical)=> match the optical K0V star b. 2MASS position( infrared) => match K0V star • 3. spectral analysis: ( energy range from 0.5 to 8.0 keV) a. absorbed power law => spectral index= 8.2 ﹗ b. blackbody c. MEKAL spectrum =>S312 is a K0V star

  14. 4. radio observation: a. GBT( Green Bank Telescope) b. no convincing pulsar –like signal were found. c. 3EG J2020+4017 is radio quiet

  15. Summary(ref.6) • 1. 3EG J2020+4017 is radio quiet • 2. Becker suggested that : X-ray emission may not be due to the main-sequence star but could arise from an accreting compact companion. • 3. 3EG J2020+4017 is a neutron star with an X-ray luminosity similar to that observed from Vela-like to middle-age pulsars • 4. pulsation and further observation=> GLAST

  16. Reference: • 1. Pulsar Astronomy, A.G. Lyne and Francis Graham-Smith • 2. Halpern J.P., Holt S.,1992,Nat,357,222 • 3. Thompson D. J. et al.,1994, ApJ,436,229 • 4. Merck M. et al., A&AS,120,465 • 5. Brazier K. T. S., et al, 1996,MNRAS, 281,1033 • 6. Becker, W., el al., ApJ,615, 897

  17. ~~~Thank You~~~

More Related