1 / 10

Improving Φ 0 via ψ 1 (independently known)

Improving Φ 0 via ψ 1 (independently known). Exactly orthogonal wave functions N.C. Bacalis Theoretical and Physical Chemistry Institute National Hellenic Research Foundation Athens, Greece. ICCMSE-2007, Corfu, Greece, 29 Sep 2007 Partial support: ENTEP2004/04EP111, GSRD, Greece.

makaio
Download Presentation

Improving Φ 0 via ψ 1 (independently known)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Improving Φ0via ψ1(independently known) Exactly orthogonal wave functions N.C. Bacalis Theoretical and Physical Chemistry Institute National Hellenic Research Foundation Athens, Greece ICCMSE-2007, Corfu, Greece, 29 Sep 2007 Partial support: ENTEP2004/04EP111, GSRD, Greece

  2. {Hψi= Εiψi, E0 < E1 <…}, Φ0≈ψ0 • ψ1 Can be Computed Independently of ψ0 (Löwdin) • Suppose (for normalized functions): • ψ1is known ψ0is unknown • Φ0(with E[Φ0] < E1) is known Φ0≈ψ0 • <ψ1|Φ0> ≠ 0 Φ0is not orthogonal to ψ1 • Φ1┴Φ0 (various Φ1,s can be computed ┴Φ0) • One of them: Φ1+(┴Φ0) is closest to ψ1

  3. One: Φ1+ (┴Φ0) is the closest (has the largest projection) to ψ1 It has energy: Among all Φ1,s orthogonal to Φ0, the closest to ψ1: Φ1+lies Lower than ψ1

  4. In a Hilbert-subspace, the lowest Hamiltonian root has the lowest energy in the subspace (Eckart).On any plane {Φ1+┴Φ1} ┴ Φ0, if <Φ1+|H|Φ1> ≠ 0, the Hamiltonian opens the gap |EΦ1+- EΦ1|. ~> EΦ1min < EΦ1+ Therefore: (unless Φ0┴ψ1): Minimizing EΦ1ORTHOGONALLY to Φ0leads to Lower Bound of ψ1: Φ1min: EΦ1min < EΦ1+ < E1 (departingfrom ψ1 instead of approaching ψ1)

  5. Equalities • If Φ0є{ψ0,ψ1} then Φ1+ є{ψ0,ψ1}, Φ1(┴{Φ0┴Φ1+}) є{ψ2, ψ3,... } ~> • < Φ1+|H| Φ1> = 0 ~> EΦ1min = EΦ1+ < E1 • If Φ0┴ψ1 then Φ1+ = ψ1, Φ1(┴{Φ0┴ Φ1+})є{ψ0, , ψ2, ψ3,... } ~> • < Φ1+|H| Φ1> = 0, ~> EΦ1min = EΦ1+ = E1

  6. Bracketing EΦ1+ < E1 < U1 By expanding any Φ in {ψ0, ψ1, ...} basis: It is easily verified that

  7. Knowing Φ1+improves Φ0 • On the plane of {Φ0┴Φ1+} containing ψ1: • Τhe highest eigenroot is Ψ+ = ψ1. • The lowest is Ψ– ≡ Φ0+ (better than Φ0), where:

  8. Rotating Φ0+ around ψ1 improves Φ0+ • Introduce Φ0++┴ {Φ0+┴ ψ1} • On the plane of {Φ0+┴ Φ0++} ┴ ψ1: • The lowest eigenroot Ψ– ≡ Φ0 –has energy EΦ0 –< EΦ0 + (closer to E0). • Introduce another Φ0+++┴ {Φ0 –┴ ψ1} • On the plane of {Φ0 –┴ Φ0+++} ┴ ψ1: • The lowest eigenroot Ψ– ≡ Φ0 – –has energy EΦ0 – –< EΦ0 – (even closer to E0), etc…

  9. Analytic atomic orbitals of NMCSCF accuracy • STO: α rn e-ζr • H (Laguerre): (Σν ανrν) e-ζr, αν= constants (same ζ, not contraction of different ζs) • Variationally optimized αν lead to concise analytic atomic orbitals of NMCSCF accuracy (reducing O[106] of configurations to O[102])

  10. EΦ1, Φ1(┴{Φ0┴Φ1+})

More Related