Academic Vision, 2005-2010 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Academic vision 2005 2010
1 / 14

  • Uploaded on
  • Presentation posted in: General

Academic Vision, 2005-2010. Whitworth College. Five Strategic Objectives. Improve on excellence in teaching, learning, and scholarship. Advance the intercultural and experiential learning enrichment opportunities for our students.

I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.

Download Presentation

Academic Vision, 2005-2010

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript

Academic vision 2005 2010

Academic Vision, 2005-2010

Whitworth College

Five strategic objectives

Five Strategic Objectives

  • Improve on excellence in teaching, learning, and scholarship.

  • Advance the intercultural and experiential learning enrichment opportunities for our students.

  • Advance research, teaching, facilities, and student achievement in the natural sciences.

  • Enhance facilities, community engagement, and collaboration in the performing and visual arts.

  • Develop and implement a strategic plan for performance and growth in graduate and continuing studies at Whitworth.

Academic excellence 05 06

Academic Excellence: ’05-’06

  • Goal: Develop an action plan to reduce our dependence upon adjunct faculty for the undergraduate day program.

  • Goal: Develop an action plan to improve teaching and learning at Whitworth College.

National survey of student engagement nsse

National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE)

Whitworth College

2005 Results

What really matters in college student engagement

What Really Matters in College Student Engagement

The research is unequivocal-

Students are not passive recipients of institutional efforts to “educate” or “change” them.

Important to focus on ways in which an institution can shape its academic, interpersonal, and extracurricular offerings to encourage student engagement.

Pascarella & Terenzini. (2005). How college affects students: A third decade of research

Why a national survey

Why A National Survey?

  • Refocus conversations about undergraduate quality to what matters most

  • Enhance institutional improvement efforts

  • Foster comparative and consortium activity

  • Inform accountability

  • Provide systematic national data on “good educational practices”

Comparison institutions

Comparison Institutions

Whitworth promising findings

Whitworth Promising Findings

  • Most students (88% freshmen, 92% seniors) would attendWhitworthif they could start over again.

  • Most students (92% freshmen, 94% seniors) say they had a good or excellent educational experience.

  • High percentage (86% freshmen, 89% seniors) rate the quality of academic advising as good to excellent.

Effect size

Effect Size

  • Indicates practical significance of the mean difference.

  • Mean difference/standard deviation of the comparison group

  • 0.2= small

  • 0.5=moderate

  • 0.8=large

  • Positive effect size=institution mean was greater than peers

  • Negative effect size=institution lags behind comparison group

  • N= 360 freshmen and 311 seniors

Personal growth effect size comparison to peers freshmen dark seniors light

Personal Growth Effect SizeComparison to Peers: Freshmen (dark) Seniors (light)

Writing comparison to peers freshmen dark seniors light

WritingComparison to Peers: Freshmen (dark) Seniors (light)

Critical thinking comparison to peers freshmen dark seniors light

Critical ThinkingComparison to Peers: Freshmen (dark) Seniors (light)

Using nsse data

Using NSSE Data

  • Discover current levels of engagement (institution, major field, year in school)

  • Determine if current levels are satisfactory (criterion reference, normative, or peer comparison)

  • Target areas for improvement

  • Modify programs and policies accordingly

  • Teach students what is required to succeed

  • Monitor student & institutional performance

Areas of




Areas for Institutional


Internal campus uses

Internal Campus Uses

  • Gauge status of campus priorities

  • Examine changes in student engagement between first and senior years

  • Assess campus progressover time

  • Encourage dialogue aboutgood practice

  • Link with other data to test hypotheses, evaluateprograms

  • Improve curricula, instruction, services


1ST Year and Senior Experience











  • Login