1 / 43

CLiMB: Computational Linguistics for Metadata Building

Center for Research on Information Access Columbia University Libraries. CLiMB: Computational Linguistics for Metadata Building. Goals of Meeting. Review progress since June 2003 meeting Advisory Board suggestions Select a new collection with narrow criteria

maille
Download Presentation

CLiMB: Computational Linguistics for Metadata Building

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Center for Research on Information Access Columbia University Libraries CLiMB: Computational Linguistics for Metadata Building Judith L. Klavans

  2. Goals of Meeting • Review progress since June 2003 meeting • Advisory Board suggestions • Select a new collection with narrow criteria • Test results outside of image access platform • Strategize for Next Steps • Potential partners • Driving questions • Selection of project direction(s) Judith L. Klavans

  3. June 2003 to November 2003 Four areas • Collections • Technology • Users and Uses • Interface Tools Judith L. Klavans

  4. Problems in Image Access • Cataloging digital images • Traditional approach: manual expertise • labor intensive • expensive • Can automated techniques help? Judith L. Klavans

  5. CLiMB Technical Contribution • CLiMB will identify and extract • proper nouns • terms and phrases • from text related to an image: September 14, 1908, the basis of the Greenes' final design had been worked out. It featured a radically informal, V-shaped plan (that maintained the original angled porch) and interior volumes of various heights, all under a constantly changing roofline that echoed the rise and fall of the mountains behind it. The chimneys and foundation would be constructed of the sandstone bouldersthat comprised the local geology, and the exterior of the house would be sheathed in stained split-redwood shakes. —Edward R. Bosley. Greene & Greene. London : Phaidon, 2000. p. 127 Judith L. Klavans

  6. Can we harvest image descriptors? angled porch v-shaped plan sandstone boulders Judith L. Klavans

  7. Progress and Planning • Collections • Technology • Users and Uses • Interface Tools Judith L. Klavans

  8. CLiMB Collections • Greene & Greene Architectural Drawings • Complex images • Scholarly texts written about the projects • Loose association between text and image • Columbia owns many images • Chinese Paper Gods • Less complex image • Lay description of each image • Small, valuable collection scanned for CLiMB • Multilingual transcription is non-standard and variable Judith L. Klavans

  9. Greene & Greene Architectural Records and Papers Collection Drawings and Archives Avery Architectural and Fine Arts Library Columbia University Libraries Judith L. Klavans

  10. Judith L. Klavans

  11. C.V. Starr East Asian Library, Columbia University Chinese Paper Gods Anne S. Goodrich Collection Judith L. Klavans

  12. Pan-hu chih-shen God of tigers Judith L. Klavans

  13. New Collection: Desiderata • Close association between text and image • Scholarly descriptions well-structured for testing NLP tools • Clear Target Object Identifiers (TOIs) • English only • Intellectual Property Rights Judith L. Klavans

  14. Potential Choice North Carolina Museum of Art : Handbook of the Collections Introduction, Lawrence J. Wheeler ; editor, Rebecca Martin Nagy ; assisted by June Spence ; contributors, Virgina Burden ... [et al.]. Raleigh : The Museum ; New York, NY : Distributed by Hudson Hills Press, 1998. Judith L. Klavans

  15. About the Collection • Available through Saskia • 70 images • Good quality images and details • Well-structured delimited text descriptions • Rights management still need to be addressed Judith L. Klavans

  16. Alex Katz American, born 1927 Six Women, 1975 Oil on canvas 114 x 282 in. Judith L. Klavans

  17. Alex Katz has developed a remarkable hybrid art that combines the aggressive scale and grandeur of modern abstract painting with a chic, impersonal realism. During the 1950s and 1960s—decades dominated by various modes of abstraction—Katz stubbornly upheld the validity of figurative painting. In major, mature works such as Six Women, the artist distances himself from his subject. Space is flattened, as are the personalities of the women, their features simplified and idealized: Katz’s models are as fetching and vacuous as cover girls. The artist paints them with the authority and license of a master craftsman, but his brush conveys little emotion or personality. In contrast to the turbulent paint effects favored by the abstract expressionist artists, Katz pacifies the surface of his picture. Through the virtuosic technique of painting wet-on- wet, he achieves a level and unifying smoothness. He further “cools” the image by adopting the casually cropped composition and overpowering size and indifference of a highway billboard or big-screen movie. In Six Women, Katz portrays a gathering of young friends at his Soho loft. The apparent informality of the scene is deceptive. It is, in fact, carefully staged. Note the three pairs of figures: the foreground couple face each other; the middle ground pair alternately look out and into the picture; and the pair in the background stand at matching oblique angles. The artist also arranges the women into two conversational triangles. Katz studied each model separately, then artfully fit the models into the picture. The image suggests an actual event, but the only true event is the play of light. From the open windows, a cordial afternoon sunlight saturates the space, accenting the features of each woman. http://ncartmuseum.org/collections/offviewcaptions.shtml#alex Judith L. Klavans

  18. Frank Philip Stella American, born 1936 Raqqa II, 1970 Synthetic polymer and graphite on canvas 120 x 300 in. Judith L. Klavans

  19. To many artists of Frank Stella’s generation, the highly subjective paintings of the abstract expressionists seemed mannered and self- indulgent. Stella’s response was to systematize the abstract picture using geometry and a strict but arbitrary set of procedures. Explaining that his art “is based on the fact that only what can be seen there is there,” he sought to distill the image to paint and canvas alone. He stripped his paintings of story or statement—even a brushstroke conveyed too much personality. Stella methodically developed images in series, first mapping the designs on paper before transferring them to canvas. Little was left to chance. Raqqa II belongs to Stella’s aptly titled Protractor Series, begun in 1967. Though never completed, the series was to include 31 compositions, each to be carried out in three different formats: interlaces, rainbows and fans. He titled the paintings after ancient, circular-planned cities. Raqqa II does not lie quietly on the wall. It dominates its surroundings. What at first glance appears a childlike pattern is actually a highly complex exercise in perception. Bright bands of flat color arc and overlap, promising an illusion of receding space. However, their containment within a strict system of seven shaped and framed units confounds that illusion. The monumental scale and aggressive confidence of Raqqa II typify American art during the 1960s. http://ncartmuseum.org/collections/offviewcaptions.shtml#frank Judith L. Klavans

  20. Progress and Planning • Collections • Technology • Users and Uses • Interface Tools Judith L. Klavans

  21. Text Analysis and Filtering • Divide text into words and phrases • Gather features for each word and phrase • E.g. Is it in the AAT? Is it very frequent? • Develop formulae using this information • Use formulae to rank for usefulness as potential metadata Judith L. Klavans

  22. What Features do we Track? • Lexical features • Proper noun, common noun • Relevancy to domain • Text Object Identifier (TOI) • Presence in the Art & Architecture Thesaurus • Presence in the back-of-book index • Statistical observations • Frequency in the text • Frequency across a larger set of texts, within and outside the domain Judith L. Klavans

  23. Problem: Too much Data! • How should the output be filtered? • What filtering helps additional text processing (e.g. for text segmentation)? • What filtering matches what users think? Judith L. Klavans

  24. Techniques for Filtering • Take an initial guess • Collect input from users • Alter formulae based on feedback • Use automatic techniques to guess (machine-learning) • Collect input from users • Run programs to make predictions based on given opinions (Bayesian networks, classifiers, decision trees) • The CLiMB approach: Use both techniques! Judith L. Klavans

  25. Initial Manual Filter • Increase score if proper noun; • Decrease score if very frequent in Brown corpus; • Increase score if frequent in back-of-book indexes; • Increase score if particularly frequent in domain specific texts; • Increase score if present in authority lists Judith L. Klavans

  26. Early Results Judith L. Klavans

  27. Next Steps • Filter “given” information (already in catalogue record if you are lucky enough to have one!) • What does CLiMB get that is new? • How much is useful? • What is the “cost”? Judith L. Klavans

  28. Segmentation • Determination of relevant segment • Difficult for Greene & Greene • The exact text related to a given image is difficult to determine • Use of TOI to find this text • Easy for Chinese Paper Gods and for next colleciton • Decision: set initial values manually and explore automatic techniques Judith L. Klavans

  29. Progress and Planning • Collections • Technology • Users and Uses • Interface Tools Judith L. Klavans

  30. Formative Evaluation Meeting • At the advice of External Advisory Board • October 17, 2003 • Goals: • Get early feedback from many user types • Incorporate that feedback into CLiMB toolset • Help shape next steps Judith L. Klavans

  31. CLiMB Project Team - Judith Klavans - Roberta Blitz - Rebecca Passonneau - Angela Giral - Vera Horvath - David Elson - Bob Wolven - Stephen Davis - Mark Weber CLiMB: External Advisory Board - Jeff Cohen (Bryn Mawr) - Carl Lagoze (Cornell) - Merrilee Proffitt (RLG) Invitees - Robert Carlucci (Columbia) - Terry Catapano (Columbia) - Paula Gabbard (Columbia) - Deborah Kempe (Frick) - Doug Oard (UMd) Could not Attend Tony Gill (Mellon) Abby Goodrum (Syracuse) Elisa Lanzi (Smith) Formative Evaluation - Attendees Judith L. Klavans

  32. Research Questions • Will CLiMB metadata help users get access to the digital images they want? • Will these terms help catalogers provide this access? • How well are the CLiMB tools performing in providing required metadata? Judith L. Klavans

  33. Formative Evaluation Agenda: http://www.columbia.edu/cu/cria/climb/meeting.html Surveys: http://www1.cs.columbia.edu/~delson/survey/gg-index.html http://www1.cs.columbia.edu/~delson/survey/cpg-index.html Judith L. Klavans

  34. What phrases do people select? Judith L. Klavans

  35. Results from Formative Evaluation • Best – Humans select, CLiMB selects • Cordelia A. Culbertson • Better - Humans select, CLiMB might not • Ludowici-Celadon Company • Better – Humans might not but CLiMB selects • house, Tichenor house, most significant house • Good – Humans do not select, CLiMB does not • problem, time Judith L. Klavans

  36. Use Results for Improvement • Determine ways to better filter CLiMB results • Use input for improving ranking Judith L. Klavans

  37. Use Results for Improvement • Use initial ranking to collect feedback • Compare CLiMB with user survey ranking • Analyze performance and study the errors • Refine formula • Repeat Beware: Danger of tailoring to test texts Judith L. Klavans

  38. Raw Results • Raw survey results are at www.cs.columbia.edu/~delson/CLiMB/checklist-results.xls • Survey results joined with CLiMB ranks, sorted by CLiMB score: www.cs.columbia.edu/~delson/CLiMB/gg-joined-results-by-rank.xls • Survey results joined with CLiMB ranks, sorted by human score: www.cs.columbia.edu/~delson/CLiMB/gg-joined-results-by-survey.xls • Quantized survey results (High/Medium/Low): www.cs.columbia.edu/~delson/CLiMB/gg-quantized-results.xls Judith L. Klavans

  39. Progress and Planning • Collections • Technology • Users and Uses • Interface Tools Judith L. Klavans

  40. Interface Tools • Planning the new interface for image professionals to prepare CLiMB metadata from texts • For catalogers / metadata specialists and visual resources professionals • Goals • to provide a platform for a wider community • to be able to collect feedback on CLiMB at a wider level • to complete the CLiMB interface “deliverable” Judith L. Klavans

  41. Interface Tools – Stay Tuned! • CLiMB toolset currently implemented with textual interface • Fully-functional shell • New graphical user interface (GUI) can be built on top of existing codebase • Perl/Tk • Design • Initiating design phase now • Consulting metadata and image specialists Judith L. Klavans

  42. Next Steps • External Advisory Board– June 2004 • Select project directions • Potential partners Judith L. Klavans

  43. Thank you! www.columbia.edu/cu/cria

More Related