1 / 28

Open source and ILSs Bob Molyneux Rowan Public Library Salisbury, North Carolina July 30, 2009

Open source and ILSs Bob Molyneux Rowan Public Library Salisbury, North Carolina July 30, 2009. Open source dates: Koha – 2000 Nelsonville 2002 Evergreen – 2004 PINES 2006. What happened on March 13, 2007?. http://www.librarytechnology.org/automationhistory.pl?SID=20080419458068847.

mahola
Download Presentation

Open source and ILSs Bob Molyneux Rowan Public Library Salisbury, North Carolina July 30, 2009

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Open source and ILSs Bob Molyneux Rowan Public Library Salisbury, North Carolina July 30, 2009

  2. Open source dates: • Koha – 2000 • Nelsonville 2002 • Evergreen – 2004 • PINES 2006

  3. What happened on March 13, 2007?

  4. http://www.librarytechnology.org/automationhistory.pl?SID=20080419458068847http://www.librarytechnology.org/automationhistory.pl?SID=20080419458068847

  5. Here the market divides • 1. Traditional ILS vendors • Terms: • “legacy” • “proprietary” • Two types: • Founders still around • Founders have sold out to VCs

  6. 1. Traditional Vendors (continued)‏ • Characteristics: • Compiled code (machine readable code)‏ • Intellectual property laws apply • They own the code and you rent it. • Advantages • “turn key” • comprehensive solution to many problems • documentation and support

  7. 1. Traditional Vendors (continued)‏ • Disadvantages • Slow development cycle • One size may not fit all • Who owns your data? • Restrictive licenses • Forced migrations • vendor lockin

  8. 2. Open source

  9. Reading assignment: Eric S. Raymond: The Cathedral & the Bazaar

  10. What does “open source” mean? “A set of principles and practices about how to write software the most important of which is that the source code is openly available....”[additionally] “...one should have the right to use it.” Wikipedia, “Open source”

  11. What does “source code” mean? “human readable” What does “compiled code” mean? machine readable

  12. Advantages of the open source method • Easy customization for your own local situation • Fast development - “release early, release often” • Cost—it's free. • can have about the same support as proprietary software

  13. Disadvantages of open source • It's free but it may not be cheap • Support—if you can't, who supports it?

  14. What happens if your ILS won't do something you need? • Proprietary • Wait until the next version • Open source • Do it yourself (or with others in the community)‏ • Either pay someone yourself or get others to contribute • Cajole, persuade, or charm someone into doing it

  15. State of the OSS US public library market about 1-2% ,give or take no figures for the academic market but they are assuredly lower

  16. But there is a new wind blowing: • Evergreen • Indiana Open Source ILS Initiative • Sitka • Michigan Library Consortium • Koha • MassCat • INCOLSA • WALDO

  17. OSS opens the way for us to change libraries and their interaction with our users Evergreen offers one way

  18. ILSs reflect their beginnings Evergreen started on PINES Large, resource-sharing consortium with a single catalog Universal borrower card

  19. What have we learned from the PINES experience? • Library users LIKE access to the large virtual library • They don't care about our politics or the difficulties under the hood • They will bypass libraries without access to consortial resources in favor of libraries with that access • Welcome to the long-tail, Google world

  20. Silos • Separate, barely communicating collections of information • Logic of IT is to break down silos and to integrate these collections • We have these persistent silos for three reasons: • Legacy vendor's lack of vision • Our lack of vision and/or politics • Think locally, act locally • Until now, no software to run these large consortia

  21. Traditional cost model

  22. Open Source Cost Model

  23. Evergreen design parameters • Had to handle PINES • 40+ PL systems, 250+ outlets • 14+ million circs • on a statewide resource-sharing network • and scale up from there

  24. Architecture Open Service Resource Format (OpenSRF)‏ Service oriented architecture Modern, modular, scalable The only ILS software that can currently run large and distributed resource-sharing networks.

  25. FullfILLment (tm)‏ • Attempt to get past the silos to one dynamic, real time search mechanism • Evergreen backend, with opportunistic connectors to legacy vendor software

  26. What other futures are possible in an open source world? • Modular—not one size fits all • More open source choices, perhaps more specialized • Index Data • VU Find • Blacklight • Mix and match • Why not open source and proprietary? • Code sharing

  27. Eric S. Raymond: The Cathedral & the Bazaar Thanks... Bob Molyneux bob@esilibrary.com 1-877-OPEN-ILS

More Related