1 / 67

Feedback on HKDSE Practice Papers

Feedback on HKDSE Practice Papers. School Leaders’ Briefing Session 5 March 2012. HKDSE Practice Papers. Papers for 24 Category A subjects produced to familiarise teachers and students with the format and requirements of the HKDSE exams Funded by EDB

mahola
Download Presentation

Feedback on HKDSE Practice Papers

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Feedback on HKDSE Practice Papers School Leaders’ Briefing Session 5 March 2012

  2. HKDSE Practice Papers • Papers for 24 Category A subjects produced to familiarise teachers and students with the format and requirements of the HKDSE exams • Funded by EDB • Delivered to schools under secure conditions in early January, with provisional marking schemes uploaded the next day for teachers' reference • All papers and marking schemes available on HKEAA website from mid February (www.hkeaa.edu.hk/tc/HKDSE/Practice_Papers/index.html)

  3. Research Study (Core Subjects) • 20 schools selected based on 2010 HKCEE results; stratified sampling but on voluntary basis • About 2,800 students' scripts collected • CEML practice papers taken as school mock exams under standard exam conditions, with HKEAA observer • Answers scripts scanned and marked onscreen • Marking statistics and samples of performance analysed

  4. Research Study (Elective Subjects) • About 100 to 400 scripts collected from a range of schools • Marked and samples of performance analysed • Valuable information about actual performance of students • Good learning opportunity for HKEAA staff and exam personnel • Trial run of marking and grading system

  5. Feedback to Schools • Over 50 briefing sessions conducted for subject teachers between mid January and 29 February • Exam requirements, assessment criteria and standards, and annotated samples of performance provided • Comments on strengths and weaknesses of candidates and advice given • Information available on HKEAA website

  6. Limitations of the Research Study • Sample size • Student readiness • Marking done by a small proportion of experienced CE/AL examiners/markers • Marks for speaking papers collected from schools for reference, not standardised • Only paper-level statistics available at this stage • Statistical data to be viewed with caution

  7. 中 國 語 文 科

  8. 中國語文科設有五卷： • 卷一 ﹕ 閱讀能力(20%)，全部試題均須作答 • 卷二： 寫作能力(20%)，要求考生寫長文一篇或 短文二至三篇 • 卷三： 聆聽能力(10%)，全部試題均須作答 • 卷四： 說話能力(14%)，分為「朗讀」及「口語 溝通」兩部分 • 卷五： 綜合能力考核(16%)，全部試題均須作答

  9. 整體表現數據

  10. 卷一 閱讀能力: 篇章取材 • 與人生和親情有關 《目送》、《認識一個十八歲的人》 • 與中國文化、文學有關 《史記．儒林列傳》 • 結構較緊密 • 手法能凸顯文章的主旨和立意 • 具思考空間

  11. 卷一: 考生的整體表現及常見錯誤 • 主要考核考生的閱讀能力，包括理解、分析、感受、鑑賞、運用不同策略等能力；重視思維和分析能力，並考核考生對中國文化、文學的認知和素養。 • 考生一般於直接考問內容重點的考題或客觀問題表現甚佳；於辨識寫作和修辭手法的考題則表現中規中矩 • 表現有欠理想的題目，包括綜合全文主旨、分析結構和手法作用，以及理解文言字詞或句式。總括而言，考生對處理比較說明或發揮個人見解方面，仍須多加努力。 • 今次所選的篇章有白話文及文言文，考生一般於文言篇章表現欠理想。

  12. 卷二寫作能力 設題要求：考生宜透過審題，思考寫作立意，選取材料，書寫文章。 審題 第一題：「抉擇」與「瞭解自己」 第二題：「快樂」與「富庶的物質生活」； 「基礎」與「難以」 第三題：「紛爭源於不自知」與圖片寓意 表 達 、 組 織 、 書 寫 立意 為文章定下主題或主旨，以確立文章的寫作方向。 選材 從個人親身經歷、生活見聞、書本知識、時人雋語去想像、聯想，再作出分析、比較，然後選取一些具深刻意義和動人情韻的題材。

  13. 卷二: 評分重點

  14. 錯別字一般評分原則 • 0-1個給3分 • 2-4個給2分 • 5-7個給1分 • 8個或以上不給分 • 重錯不計

  15. 卷二: 考生整體表現

  16. 卷二: 考生整體表現 • 立意與選材： • 一般能掌握題目要求。 • 部分考生立意平凡、選材蕪雜。 • 詞句與表達手法： • 表達大致恰當，文句基本達意，偶有口語或潮語入文。 • 未能做到用詞精確，文句簡潔扼要。 • 少用修辭及表達技巧。 • 文章組織： • 邊寫邊想，沒刻意布局。 • 少有做到不枝不蔓。 • 標點字體： • 標點大致恰當，但變化較少。 • 字體較潦草，筆劃模糊。

  17. 卷三聆聽能力 • 第一段錄音 • 場境：同學一起討論有關神話的戲劇 • 主題：神話的分類和作用 • 第二段錄音 • 場境：戲劇演員跟觀眾交流 • 主題：演員分享演戲的心得和體會 • 第三段錄音 • 場境：課堂討論 • 主題：神話的意義和價值

  18. 卷三: 考生整體表現 • 考核考生辨明說話者立場、觀點、論據、說話技巧、語氣等聆聽能力。 • 考生一般於擷取資訊的題目甚佳；綜合整理、歸納分類的題目表現中規中矩。但若試題要求考生依據語境推論分析，並須簡略說明或發揮個人見解，一般表現較弱。 • 部分考生審題不周、答非所問；又或於答題時詞不達意、概念不清、脫離語境或理解錯誤。

  19. 卷五綜合能力考核 題目 試以學生會候選內閣主席文爾雅或武娉娉的身分，撰寫一篇演講辭，在學生會選舉諮詢大會上發表，提出所屬內閣的競選口號。 考核理解、思考、組織、文字表達等能力。考生須聆聽錄音、閱讀文字圖表後，再寫作。此卷試題多與生活事務有關。 19

  20. 卷五: 考生整體表現 • 考生於演辭格式方面鮮見犯錯，對理念立場亦十分清晰；惟多有忽略大會背景，於撰寫競選口號表現中規中矩，偶見潮語英文。至於措辭語氣方面，考生多只能做到有基本禮貌，得體者少。 • 於整合拓展資料方面，考生多能整合政綱名稱、措施項目，但整合資料頗見脫漏，不少漏引調查數據；少引用精確數據解釋措施之好處。一般考生答題內容字數多惟訊息少。 • 考生於見解論證方面，一般能依聆聽所指示之方向批評對手政綱，少數表現佳者意見中肯，有理有據。表現中規中矩的考生，一般論述未深，理據不多；表現較弱者則只照抄聆聽考材，而理據薄弱。 • 考生答題組織大多穩妥，起承轉合，段落分明，但不少考生時間分配不善，整合拓展多，而見解論證少，以至結構失衡。考生一般答題時用詞平實，偶有語病，錯別字逾六個者，為數不少；較少考生能做到文字清通，修飾得宜。

  21. English Language

  22. Assessment Framework

  23. Summary Statistics

  24. Paper 2 Writing Part A (10%) • Short, guided task • About 200 words • Situation, purpose & relevant information provided Part B (15%) • Longer, more open-ended task • About 400 words • Choice of one out of 8 questions • Each based on one of the 8 modules in the Elective Part

  25. Marking • Double marking by question • Three domains for assessment: Content, Language and Organisation, with equal weighting for each

  26. Paper 2 Raw Mark Statistics

  27. Paper 2B Raw Mark Statistics

  28. Paper 2B Raw Mark Statistics

  29. Advice for Candidates (1) • Read the questions carefully and try to fulfil all the requirements of the task • Develop ideas with examples and supporting details • Pay attention to who the writer and the intended readers are • Don’t use prepared sentences, paragraphs and stock phrases • Memorised paragraphs / essays will be disregarded and not awarded any marks. Zero marks will be given to totally memorised essays

  30. Advice for Candidates (2) • Candidates should not waste time counting the no. of words written. • As a general guide, + or – 10% is acceptable (so between 360 to 440 for ‘about 400 words’). • Quality is more important than quantity.

  31. Paper 1 Reading • Consists of two parts: Part A - Compulsory Part B - Section 1 (easier) Section 2 (more difficult) • Candidates choose either Section 1 or 2 • Candidates attempting Section 2 can attain up to Level 5** • Candidates attempting Section 1 can attain up to Level 4 only

  32. Paper 1 Reading Number of scripts Part A 2,839 Part B1 1,431 (~50%) Part B2 1,419 (~50%) * 11 students answered both B1 and B2

  33. Results in Part A

  34. Results in Part B1

  35. Results in Part B2

  36. Paper 3 Listening and Integrated Skills • Consists of two parts: Part A (compulsory) Part B - Section 1 (easier) - Section 2 (more difficult) • Candidates choose to do either Section 1 or 2 • Candidates attempting Section 2 can attain up to Level 5** • Candidates attempting Section1 can attain up to Level 4 only

  37. Paper 3 Listening and Integrated Skills Number of candidates: Part 3A: 2,845 Part 3B1: 1,332 (46.74%) Part 3B2: 1,513 (53.26%)

  38. Paper 3A Results

  39. Part 3A Score Distribution

  40. Paper 3 Part B1 Results

  41. Paper 3 Part B2 Results

  42. Papers 1 and 3: Graded Approach • Need to convert B1 scores to the same scale as B2 scores • After equating, scores can be compared across these two parts of the paper, even though they differ in number of items, difficulty, etc. • Paper score = Part A score + Part B score

  43. Part 3A Score Distribution

  44. How 3B1 Students Performed in 3A

  45. How 3B2 Students Performed in 3A

  46. Equating (e.g. Paper 3)

  47. Equating

  48. Equating

  49. Equating

  50. Part B1 to Part B2 Conversion Factor

More Related