This presentation is the property of its rightful owner.
1 / 6

# The ‘Greimas’ or Semiotic Square PowerPoint PPT Presentation

The ‘Greimas’ or Semiotic Square

The ‘Greimas’ or Semiotic Square

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

#### Presentation Transcript

The ‘Greimas’ or Semiotic Square

The semiotic square is a way of extending the analysis of meanings by increasing the number of analytical classes around some initial focus – the assumption is Saussure’s: that meaning will, in fact, exist as part of a semantic field articulated through difference. It is usual to begin with the identification of contrary meaning. For example, starting with the familiar contraries of life and death, the square makes explicit the possibility of such curiosities as life and death (the living dead?), and neither life nor death (ghosts?). With its full expansion the semiotic square offers us 10 analytic classes.

The ten classes with terminology:-

5=(1+2) complex term

2 term B

1 term A

7=(1+3) positive deixis

8=(2+4) negative deixis

9=(1+4) and 10=(2+3)

4 term NOT-A

3 term NOT-B

6=(3+4) neutral term

The + sign indicates the location of synthesis points – called metaterms. Other aspects of a typical analysis are objects (things identified at class positions), subjects (those doing the classifying), and time (the narrativised event context).

So, the semiotic square is composed of four terms, the first two form the opposition (the contrary relation) and the other two are produced through their negation. Here’s another worked and expanded example:-

5. Masculine+Feminine

hermaphrodite.

1. Masculine ‘man’

2. Feminine ‘woman’

8. Feminine+Not-masculine

‘ultra-feminine’

7. Masculine+Not-feminine

‘ultra man’

9? and 10?

3. Not-feminine ‘mannish’

4. Not-masculine ‘effeminate’.

6. Not-feminine+Not-masculine ‘angel’

On page 131 of your first hand-out Jameson uses an adaptation of the semiotic square to bring out particular relationships in Stapledon’s Starmaker,

5. HUMANS

1. The One nautiloid

2. Dualism the symbionts (external)

7. The STARS

8. SOCIAL CLASS

9? and 10?

3. Non-Dualism plant peopleinternalized dualism prosthesis industry

4. The Many

the swarm mobility

6. UTOPIAN COLLECTIVE

COMPLEX TERM

(‘for’ and ‘against’ all at once

2. AGAINST

1. FOR

4. NOT ‘FOR’

3. NOT ‘AGAINST’

NEUTRAL TERM (neither ‘for’ nor ‘against’)

On page 178 of your second hand-out, Jameson reminds his readers of a simplified reading of the semiotic square; it will be the precursor of his concluding diagram on page 181.

COMPLEX TERM

Space of substantive representation: the garden city the postmodern sprawl

COUNTRY nature or Being (the family?)

CITY society (the individual?)

The cultural (politics)

The material (economics)

CRITIQUE OF THE CITY Overpopulation. Filth and disease. Immorality, consumerism, addiction.

CRITIQUE OF THE COUNTRY critique of authenticity, anti-foundationalism, anti-essentialism, anti-ontology.