Geological repository development in the czr and public involvement
This presentation is the property of its rightful owner.
Sponsored Links
1 / 32

Geological Repository Development in the CZR and Public Involvement PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 94 Views
  • Uploaded on
  • Presentation posted in: General

Geological Repository Development in the CZR and Public Involvement. Jiří Slovák Deputy Managing Director Radioactive Waste Repository Authority Liblice , April 26, 2011. Řež. Praha. Temelín. NPP in operation. Research Reactor. Uranium mine. Repository. SF Storage.

Download Presentation

Geological Repository Development in the CZR and Public Involvement

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript


Geological repository development in the czr and public involvement

Geological Repository Development in the CZRand Public Involvement

Jiří Slovák

Deputy Managing Director

Radioactive Waste Repository Authority

Liblice, April 26, 2011


Nuclear sites in the czech republic

Řež

Praha

Temelín

NPP in operation

Research Reactor

Uranium mine

Repository

SF Storage

Nuclear sites in the Czech Republic

Richard

Bratrství

Dolní Rožínka

Dukovany

GR development and public involvement, Liblice, April 27, 2011


Outlook of presentation

Outlook of presentation

  • Technical view how to select site for GR

  • How many sites to prepare for the site selection process?

  • How to select suitable site with involving local public into site selection process?

GR development and public involvement, Liblice, April 27, 2011


Geological repository development in the czr and public involvement

1. Technical view how to select site for DGR

GR development and public involvement, Liblice, April 27, 2011


Current hlw snf management

Current HLW / SNF Management

Amount

  • HLW 3000 m3

  • SNF – NPP Dukovany – 1940 t (40 years operation)

  • SNF – NPP Temelin – 1790 t (40 years operation)

    Storage at sites of NPPs DukovanyandTemelin

    Final disposal at GR (operation from 2065)

  • Enough time for options (reprocessing, partitioning and transmutation)

GR development and public involvement, Liblice, April 27, 2011


Rawm concept 2002

RAWM Concept 2002

LLW /ILW waste

  • Continuing disposal into existing repository

    • Bratrství - 2030

    • Richard - 2070

    • Dukovany – 2100

      HLW / SNF

  • Geological Repository

    • 2015 – Two suitable sites – main and alternate

    • 2025 – Approve the safety of the main site

    • 2030 – Construction of Underground Research Laboratory

    • 2065 – Commissioning of the GR

  • Support to R&D of P&T

  • International GR

    • A potential appreciation of GR development investments

GR development and public involvement, Liblice, April 27, 2011


Spent nuclear fuel management

Spent Nuclear Fuel Management

  • Storage at pools (ČEZ, a. s.)

    • After removal of SNF from reactor it is stored approx. 5 years at pools

  • Interim Storage of SNF

    • CASTOR casks

      • 440/84,

      • 1000/19

    • Transport and storage container

    • Interim Storage Capacity at the NPP´s sites

  • Central Interim Storage

    • Skalka site

    • Suitable rock for construction underground storage capacity

GR development and public involvement, Liblice, April 27, 2011


Geological repository development in the czr and public involvement

FinalDeepGeologicalRepository (DGR)

Reference Design 1999– visualisation

Scandinavian disposal concept adopted for theCzech condition


Future new npps in the czr and estimated spent fuel production reference design 2011

Future new NPPs in the CZRand estimated spent fuel production Reference design 2011

Waste amount

HLW 5000 m3

SNF - EDU 1 (4 reactors) 1940 t (40 years operation)

SNF - ETE 1 (2 reactors)1790 t (40 years operation)

SNF - ETE 2 and EDU 2 up to 5000 t (60 years operation)

Direct disposal in Deep Geological Repository

Two suitable site in 2015

Final site selection in 2025

Operation from 2065

Required space for 5 862 disposal containers

2 047 disposal containers (440 type)

1 124 disposal containers (1 000 type)

2 691 disposal containers (new type)

GR development and public involvement, Liblice, April 27, 2011


Geological repository reference design 2011 layout

Geological Repository Reference design 2011 layout

GR development and public involvement, Liblice, April 27, 2011


Geological repository reference design 2011 technical data

Geological Repository Reference design 2011 – technical data

GR development and public involvement, Liblice, April 27, 2011


Geological repository development in the czr and public involvement

2. How many sites are prepare for the site selection process?

GR development and public involvement, Liblice, April 27, 2011


D gr site selection in the czech republic

DGR site selection in the Czech republic

  • Stage 1 – Evaluation of the whole territory of the Czech Republic (study of archive geological data)

  • Stage 2 – Narrowing the area of sites (geological research works without drilling – geological research)

    Government decision (June 2nd 2004) - to interrupt ongoing geological surveys at the sites until 2009

  • Stage 3 – Site selection

    • geological survey with main methods:

      • surface geophysical and geochemical exploration, geological mapping

      • Deep boreholes drilling

    • the goal - suitable geology for selection 1 + 1 sites (main and alternate)

GR development and public involvement, Liblice, April 27, 2011


What has been done dgr site selection process 1

What has been done? DGR Site selection process (1)

GR development and public involvement, Liblice, April 27, 2011


What has been done dgr site selection process 2

SITES

1 Lubenec 2 Pačejov nádraží 3 Božejovice 4 Pluhův Žďár 5 Rohozná-Růžená 6 Budišov

11

1

8

7

10

3

2

6

4

5

9

7 Borohrádek 8 Teplá 9 Zbytiny 10 Opatovice 11 Lodín-N.B.

What has been done? DGR Site selection process (2)

GR development and public involvement, Liblice, April 27, 2011


What has been done dgr site selection process 3

1

What has been done? DGR Site selection process (3)

1 Lubenec 2 Pačejov nádraží 3 Božejovice 4 Pluhův Žďár 5 Rohozná-Růžená 6 Budišov

3

2

5

4

6

Selected sites for DGR – granitic rock

GR development and public involvement, Liblice, April 27, 2011


Potential gr sites and explored military domains

Potential GR sites and explored military domains

GR development and public involvement, Liblice, April 27, 2011


Military domain boletice

MilitarydomainBoletice

GR development and public involvement, Liblice, April 27, 2011


Geological repository development in the czr and public involvement

Rock masive between Rožná – Olší uranium mines

Site Kraví hora – geological position

U-mine Rožná

U-mine Olší

GR development and public involvement, Liblice, April 27, 2011


Site selection process 6 2 sites for next survey

Site selection process 6 + 2 sites fornext survey

  • Crystalline host rock

  • Granite

  • Gneiss

  • Crystalline host rock

  • Granite

  • Gneiss

GR development and public involvement, Liblice, April 27, 2011


Site selection process 6 2 sites for oncoming geological survey

Site selection process 6 + 2 sites for oncoming geological survey

GR development and public involvement, Liblice, April 27, 2011


Geological repository development in the czr and public involvement

3. How to select suitable site with involving local public into site selection process?

GR development and public involvement, Liblice, April 27, 2011


Communication with the public

Communication with the public

  • Integral part of RAWRA’s activities

  • Open and transparent communication strategy

  • Effort aimed at creating trust in the technical soundness of the siting process and repository safety

  • International experience (NEA - FSC, EU – RISCOM)

GR development and public involvement, Liblice, April 27, 2011


Important government decision how to select site with public involvement

Important government decision how to select site with public involvement

CZ Policy for Radioactive Waste and Spent Fuel Management (approved by the Czech government on 15 May 2002, resolution No. 487)

  • Goal 2015 - To find two sites with the „best geological conditions“ harmonised with specific needs for supposed site development

    Spatial development policy of the CZR 2008 (approved by the Czech government on 2009)

  • Goal for ministry o Industry and Trade and RAWRA – to select two suitable sites for future GR with involving public

GR development and public involvement, Liblice, April 27, 2011


Communication with the public1

Communication with the public

  • Integral part of RAWRA’s activities

  • Open and transparent communication strategy

  • Effort aimed at creating trust in the technical soundness of the siting process and repository safety

  • International experience (NEA - FSC, EU – RISCOM and ARGONA projects)

GR development and public involvement, Liblice, April 27, 2011


Involving public what happened where we are going

Involving public – what happened, where we are going

  • By the ARGONA project - first public hearing in May 2009

  • November 2009 – National conference – „Deliberation - Way to the Deep Geological Repository“

    • under the auspices of the minister of industry and trade

    • First „round table“ discussion across all stakeholders

  • June 2010 – „round table“ discussion how to establish transparency and open dialogue with all stakeholders

    • First discussion about establishing „Working group“ independent discussion forum for set up transparency site selection with involving public

  • November 25th –first Working Group meeting

GR development and public involvement, Liblice, April 27, 2011


Working group participated stakeholders

Working group participated stakeholders

  • 3 delegates of ministries and state organisations – MTI, MEnv, SONS

  • 2 delegates from concerned local communities (where explor. Act. Are planed)

  • 1 delegate from local NGO

  • 2 delegates from CZ NGOs

  • 2 delegates from both CZ Parliaments Chambers

  • 1 representative from RAWRA

    Main principles

    • Voluntariness, transparency and „Safe Space“ for open dialogue

    • Own „profit“ is legal right of each participated side

GR development and public involvement, Liblice, April 27, 2011


Site selection process only by involving a local municipalities

Site selection process only by involving a local municipalities

Call to local municipalities

to participate on the site selection process

Motivation for local municipalities

Direct annul payment to municipal budget from nuclear account – only where is licence for RAWRA for geological survey

supposed 320 – 600 k€ per year (changing of atomic law in 2011)

Geological survey start only on the site where local communities want to participate

GR development and public involvement, Liblice, April 27, 2011


Supposed site selection pro cess 2011 2015

Supposed Site selection process2011 - 2015

  • Geological surveys on sites

    • Parallel geophysical and geochemical landscape survey

    • Drilling of boreholes (5 – 500 m, 2 (3) 1000 m)

    • Rock characterization – in situ measurements, laboratory research

  • Environmental site specific studies

    At the sites with suitable geology:

    Design of the GR

    Feasibility Studies

    Preliminary Safety Case

    Environmental impacts study

    Wide discussion with the public

    Finally decision about 1+1 approved by government

    The most important –involve public into site selection process

GR development and public involvement, Liblice, April 27, 2011


Site selection process how many sites will be explore

Site selection process How many sites will be explore?

Only on the sites where local municipalities want to participate

By the technical and economical option (RAWRA budget)

Annualy - one (or two) site(s) will start to explore at most

A maximum 4 sites will be explored

GR development and public involvement, Liblice, April 27, 2011


Geological repository development in the czr and public involvement

Public Involvement Review Project

with EU support = IPPA project

GR development and public involvement, Liblice, April 27, 2011


Geological repository development in the czr and public involvement

Thanks for your attention

Jiří Slovák

www.rawra.cz,

[email protected]

GR development and public involvement, Liblice, April 27, 2011


  • Login