1 / 30

Recent Progress in Flibe Chemistry Control, Corrosion, and Tritium Behavior

Recent Progress in Flibe Chemistry Control, Corrosion, and Tritium Behavior. Phil Sharpe Fusion Safety Program Idaho National Laboratory, USA. HAPL Program Meeting ORNL 21-22 March 2006. Topics for Review. Research Program Logic Purification Mobilization REDOX Corrosion

magda
Download Presentation

Recent Progress in Flibe Chemistry Control, Corrosion, and Tritium Behavior

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Recent Progress inFlibe Chemistry Control, Corrosion, and Tritium Behavior Phil Sharpe Fusion Safety Program Idaho National Laboratory, USA HAPL Program Meeting ORNL 21-22 March 2006

  2. Topics for Review • Research Program Logic • Purification • Mobilization • REDOX • Corrosion • Deuterium/tritium PermeationBehavior in Flibe

  3. Hydro-fluorination approach Bubble H2/HF/He thru melt (530ºC) Chemical reactions BeO + 2HF = BeF2 + H2O MF2 + H2 = M + 2HF Chemical Analysis of Flibe Components Pre- post- purification Techniques: Metals: ICP-AES, ICP-MS, dissolution C, N, O: LECO Flibe Purification and Analysis Control instruments & He-HF gas cabinet Pot/heater assembly Titration cell Gas manifolds HF traps Processed Flibe

  4. Experiments on Flibe mobilization in Ar, air and humid air were completed. Obtained vapor pressures and mobilization estimates. Observed interesting behavior of the salt in different air and crucible environments Mobilization Studies

  5. Approach: Expose molten Flibe to Ar, air, moist air at 500-800ºC, quantify and characterize mobilized material Tests in argon agree with Knudsen mass spec data but are less than ORNL extrapolations and calculations Mobilized deposits were analyzed by ICP-AES. Vapor pressures were derived assuming BeF2 and LiBeF3 vapor species Tests in air and moist air show no significant differences from tests in argon Mobilization Studies, cont.

  6. Flibe under neutron irradiation will generate free fluorine and/or TF which can be quite corrosive Need to control fluorine potential to minimize corrosion Use Beryllium as the redox agent to tie up the free fluorine BeF2 has the lowest free energy of formation for all metal fluorides except LiF. Thus, BeF2 is the most stable with respect to other metal fluorides and TF as well Be is also useful for neutron multiplication in a blanket system. Flibe REDOX Control Studies- Needs

  7. Flibe REDOX Control Studies- Rationale • Reactor calculations by DK Sze and APEX team suggest F- and/or TF concentration would be ~ 10 wppb per pass in the reactor • This level corresponds to ~ 10 Pa which is 10-100 times below measurement sensitivity • Evaluate REDOX behavior of Be in Flibe at different concentration levels of HF • Evaluate Be solubility behavior in Flibe • Develop kinetics model to guide experiments at very low HF level that are more representative of fusion blanket conditions • Establish data needed for key checkpoint prior to tritium/corrosion testing Metal Wall, M M (surface) F- n+LiF Be+ (surface or dissolved) T+ Key issue is chemical competition between T+, Be+ and metal wall for the free fluorine. REDOX control is expected to tie up F- and minimize formation of TF and MF

  8. Be rod Flibe REDOX Control Studies- Approach • Three key reactions: • Be +2HF <--> BeF2+ H2 • H2 + MF2 <--> M + 2HF • HF(g) <--> HF(s) • H2(s) <--> H2(g) • Inject HF into the Flibe and measure change in HF in the outlet gas as a signature of the REDOX potential • Insert Be rod into Flibe for a specified time and then remove • If Be solubility in Flibe is enough to provide REDOX control, then HF will be converted to H2. If not, then REDOX is controlled by H2/HF reaction itself and we would expect to see no change in the gas Measure HF in the gas phase as a signature of REDOX potential Inject HF into the Flibe • On line measurement of HF in the gas with titrator and mass spectrometer allows dynamic time dependent information to be obtained • Can change HF level, temperature, Be exposure time and see dynamic change in system

  9. Both titrator and QMS used to estimate Be concentration in the salt after dunking with comparable results Even after 1 hr, the Be concentration is an order of magnitude less than that measured from dissolution test samples Need long term Be dunk in redox system to more accurately determine Csat in the model Be Dissolution Kinetics: Preliminary Data Simple Mass Transfer Model

  10. Be dunked in the salt for varying lengths of time HF concentration in the gas phase measured via QMS HF feed for these experiments was nominally 1000 ppm HF is initially reacted almost entirely by the Be As Be is depleted via reaction with HF, reaction rate slows Redox Results: HF Concentration vs time Times on the plot are Be exposure times

  11. HF conversion, f, is defined by: High conversion while Be remains immersed in Flibe Reduction in conversion as Be dissolved in Flibe is consumed Shape of curve is “inverted S” REDOX Results: HF conversion versus time

  12. reaction rate empirical relationship Simple REDOX Kinetics Modeling • First attempt at a model neglected mass transfer limitations, rather assuming the kinetics are effectively reaction limited. • The data best fit a reaction rate law first order in HF and Be, coupled with an unmixed reactor. • Latest results appear to suggest that the reaction is in fact limited by diffusion of HF into the salt. The model is, thus, being reworked. plug flow reactor relationship between xBe and time

  13. When plotted in this dimensionless terms (f vs. xBe), the results are remarkably consistent Conversion (f) is based on mass spec data and Be mole fraction (xBe) is from titrator data Model predicts results very well Lower HF concentration data is currently being used to improve the model. Simple REDOX Kinetics Modeling- Results

  14. He He+H2+HF TC He He He He+H2+HF Corrosion Tests in Flibe Pot-arrangement corrosion tests (stagnant fluid):

  15. Planned Corrosion Tests • Baseline Redox test with 5-hour Be exposure. • HF=1075 ppmv, H2/HF=11, Flow Rate=140 sccm • Measure HF output with QMS and by titration • Dissolve salt for H2 release, i.e., Be metal content • • Test with 5-hour Be dunk, then expose ferritic steel • Sample salt, ICP analyses for Fe, Cr, W and Ni • Continue test beyond Be Redox control point • • Remove metallic impurities by electrodeposition Test another ferritic steel coupon without the Be Redox pretreatment. • • Post-test Analyses: fracture, clean and examine sample by various methods, e.g., SEM, AES, XPS, XRD, and RBS

  16. Exposure and Sampling Probesfor Corrosion Tests Test positions for Be and FS sample Depth of exposure: 2.3 cm

  17. Consideration of Insulating Material HF reactions with ceramics oxides Alumina was selected.

  18. Redox vs Corrosion Parameters Be sample for corrosion tests Be sample for Redox tests Redox vs Corrosion HF (ppm) = 500 F.R. = 120 sccm H2/HF = 10 HF input rate= 4.6E-8 mol/s HF (ppm) = 1075 F.R. = 140 sccm H2/HF = 11 HF input rate= 1.12E-7 mol/s Diameter: 0.76 cm Depth: 1.9 cm Area: 4.99 cm2 Diameter: 0.51 cm Depth: 2.3 cm Area: 3.87 cm2

  19. Analyses of Salt Samples Salt Sample: ~1.3 grams ~ 1 gram ~ 0.3 gram Nitric acid dissolutions: ICP-AES determinations For Fe, Cr, W and Ni Sulfuric acid dissolutions: H2 release, i.e., Be metal determinations

  20. Be Determinationed from Acid Tests Be Solubility

  21. Chemical Analyses of Flibe following FS exposure Predicted increases of Fe in Flibe Flibe Batch: 475 g (14.7 moles) Size of salt sample: 1.4 gram Ferritic steel sample: Composition: 89Fe-9Cr-2W Exposed area: 0.65 cm2

  22. Post-test Examination of FS Samples FS sample with flibe coating Weigh and fracture sample Baseline samples (thickness, mass) Top section (Japanese) (re-weigh) Bottom section (INL) (re-weigh) SEM of cross-section: Flibe to salt interface Remove flibe: molten KCl:LiCl, then rinse with water, re-weigh Send to Japan: XRD, RBS, XPS and Moessbauer analysis Surface analyses at INL: SEM, XPS and AES Measure loss in thickness

  23. Integral test approach: Dual permeation probes assembly Combine experiment and modeling One-dimensional diffusion Nickel probes(0.5 mm) are Flibe resistant Diffusion in Flibe is rate-limiting 400 cc of Flibe Tests at 600 and 650ºC Permeation experiments:Interrelated transport processes and chemical interactions characterize the behavior of hydrogen isotopes in molten salts Transport parameters Diffusion, solubility, convection in melt Recombination at metal surfaces Liquid/gas phase transport Chemical interactions HT or HF Trapping of T at impurities

  24. Results of experiments: without/with Flibe Without Flibe Without & with Flibe D2 Partial Pressure D2 Partial Pressure Derived permeabilities in empty pot show good agreement with Robertson’s correlation for Ni Reduction in probe-2 concentration of D2 (due to low solubility in Flibe) Time delay for observation of permeation signal in probe 2 (due to slow diffusivity in flibe)

  25. Correlation of D diffusivity and solubility in Flibe • Diffusion data • > D from viscosity estimate • < D from capillary experiment • activation E similar to F- diffusion Solubility data Derived solubilities are comparable to those reported by Field et al. for DF in Flibe Diffusion Coefficient (m2/s) Solubility Coefficient

  26. Activities for theFLiBe Tritium Permeation Experiment Activity 1: Installation and testing of permeation chamber in pot furnace arrangement Activity 2: TMAP modeling of permeation chamber Activity 3: Design of tritium handling and diagnostics systems

  27. Activity 1: Setup of Permeation Pot • Permeation chamber received from Japan in October 2005; testing revealed pinhole leaks in several welds, repairs were made • Chamber is designed to fit within pot furnace placed in glovebox; same system used for D2 permeation studies • Salt bath is optional if thermal gradients persist or wall leakage is substantial • New batch of Flibe is being prepared; hydro-fluorination purification to proceed following completion of corrosion studies replace photo with one showing GC- for SCM

  28. Activity 2: TMAP modeling of Permeation Chamber • Straightforward modeling tool will help optimize experiment layout, e.g. required sweep gas flow rates, need for use of salt bath, thickness of Flibe for appropriately timed experiments, etc. • 1-D axial model with sink terms to simulate radial loss of T • Builds on success of TMAP modeling with D2 permeation experiment • Suitable study for graduate student, but need to perform soon Model basis for permeation pot by Fukada et al.

  29. Vacuum pump Pressure gauge HF trap Flow meter exhaust Flow meter Gas chromatograph or QMS or ionization chamber Flow meter Cap High temperature salt Flinak or Flibe Ni Ar D2 T2 dip Be if Redox control is successful Activity 3: Design and testing of tritium handling anddiagnostics systems • Tritium provided in pressurized vessel containing D2/T2 mixture • Glovebox setup to contain potential leaks • Localized tritium cleanup will be connected • GC column for H isotope separation has been tested with tritium; works well but needs calibration • Develop DF/TF generator if schedule permits Conceptual layout proposed by Fukada et al.

More Related