Hazard classification of the remote handled low level waste disposal facility
Download
1 / 20

Hazard Classification of the Remote Handled Low-Level Waste Disposal Facility - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 63 Views
  • Uploaded on

Hazard Classification of the Remote Handled Low-Level Waste Disposal Facility. Boyd D. Christensen Battelle Energy Alliance, Idaho National Laboratory P.O. Box 1625 Idaho Falls, Idaho 83415 208-526-7914 [email protected] May 9 2012. Remote Handled Low Level Waste Disposal at INL .

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about ' Hazard Classification of the Remote Handled Low-Level Waste Disposal Facility' - mae


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
Hazard classification of the remote handled low level waste disposal facility

Hazard Classification of the Remote Handled Low-Level Waste Disposal Facility

Boyd D. Christensen

Battelle Energy Alliance, Idaho National Laboratory

P.O. Box 1625

Idaho Falls, Idaho 83415

208-526-7914

[email protected]

May 9 2012


Remote handled low level waste disposal at inl
Remote Handled Low Level Waste Disposal at INL Disposal Facility

  • The INL consists of a number of different research complexes conducting science and engineering solutions to nuclear energy development programs

  • Many of these programs generate RH LLW.

  • Current disposal is at the Radioactive Waste Management Complex (RWMC) on the INL site.

  • RWMC is scheduled for closure within the next 3-5 years


Inl facilities generating rh llw
INL Facilities Generating RH LLW Disposal Facility

  • Materials and Fuels Complex (MFC)

    • Hot Fuels Examination Facility

    • Fuel Conditioning Facility

    • Analytical Laboratory

    • EBR-II Legacy waste in temporary storage

  • Advanced Test Reactor (ATR)

    • Reactor component hardware

    • Reactor system resin beds

  • Naval Reactor Facility (NRF) Expended Core Facility

    • Reactor component hardware

    • Reactor system resin beds


Alternatives for rh llw disposal
Alternatives for RH LLW Disposal Disposal Facility

  • Nevada National Security Site – smaller cask, more shipments (>100/yr), 1420 miles r/t, 25000 population along travel corridor, greater risk

  • Commercial disposal facility – program risks

  • INL RH LLW disposal Facility** - “out of commerce” transportation, use of existing cask systems, no population, lower risk

  • No action – INL R&D mission impact, national security impact

    **Highest ranked alternative for INL RH LLW disposal


Inl geography and proposed facility location
INL Geography Disposal Facilityand proposed facility location


Facility concept
Facility Concept Disposal Facility


Disposal vault concept
Disposal Vault Concept Disposal Facility


Cask operations
Cask Operations Disposal Facility


Cask operations1
Cask Operations Disposal Facility


Cask operations2
Cask Operations Disposal Facility


Cask operations3
Cask Operations Disposal Facility


Cask operations4
Cask Operations Disposal Facility


Facility closure concept
Facility Closure Concept Disposal Facility


Waste streams
Waste Streams Disposal Facility

  • LLW solids

    • <100 nCi/g TRU elements

    • > 200 mrem/hr

    • Anticipate up to 60,000 R/hr

    • <15 g fissionable material per disposal vault

    • No liquids allowed

  • Waste packaged in SS canisters in generating facilities then transferred by shielded cask to disposal facility


Facility hazard categorization
Facility Hazard Categorization Disposal Facility

  • Following DOE-STD-1027, preliminary HC based on entire facility inventory (only modification is exemption of sealed sources meeting specific criteria)

  • Final HC can be performed considering 1) alternate release fractions and 2) change in material subject to an accident due to facility features that preclude bringing material together or causing harmful interaction from a common severe phenomenon(facility segmentation)


Preliminary hazard categorization
Preliminary Hazard Categorization Disposal Facility

  • Simple screening step to identify likely hazard category

  • Consideration of form, location, dispersibility, and interaction with energy sources are not given

  • Sealed sources may be exempt from inventory for HC; fissile material in sealed sources not excluded

    • Special form criteria; DOT, NRC, ANSI


Final hazard categorization
Final Hazard Categorization Disposal Facility

  • Modification of TQs

    • Alternate release fractions used for “obvious gross inconsistency”

    • Potential to increase HC based on higher dispersible form or interaction with energy source

  • Facility Segmentation (2 cases)

    • A multiple structure facility – physically separated structures (example: multiple storage bunkers with one common safety basis [one facility])

    • A single but segmented facility – internally divided into non-interacting segments


Hazard categorization for rh llw disposal facility
Hazard Categorization for RH-LLW Disposal Facility Disposal Facility

  • Preliminary HC; HC-2 nuclear facility – based on total facility inventory

  • Final HC; consideration for facility segmentation results in HC-3 sum of fractions


Is lower hc better
Is Lower HC Better? Disposal Facility

  • What are benefits of adjusting (lowering) HC?

    • Simpler safety basis development

  • What are the risks associated with lowering HC?

    • Risk of exceeding TQs if HC-3

    • May limit future operations and waste streams


Conclusion
Conclusion Disposal Facility

  • For the RH-LLW disposal facility at INL no significant cost savings in downgrading HC

  • Does not change the facility Performance Category or QA requirements (SDC drives design)

  • No real benefit or advantage (but some added risk) identified for downgrading HC

  • Initial HC-2 classification to remain in effect


ad