1 / 6

Chapter 4: Broken Promises Bowles and Gintis

Chapter 4: Broken Promises Bowles and Gintis. Current Approaches. Liberal Reformers: integrative function egalitarian function developmental function Functionalist (underlying assumption: meritocracy): most qualified fill occupational positions

madison
Download Presentation

Chapter 4: Broken Promises Bowles and Gintis

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Chapter 4:Broken PromisesBowles and Gintis

  2. Current Approaches • Liberal Reformers: integrative function egalitarian function developmental function • Functionalist (underlying assumption: meritocracy): most qualified fill occupational positions equal opportunity independent of race,class/gender inequality  human differences

  3. Education  the Great Equalizer • Solutions  change people, not the system • Data consistently demonstrate major predictor of level and type of education  parental SES • Parents w/ HS education  children attend community college • Equal test scores  High SES parents  children achieve higher levels of education • Top 25% of high ability students  high SES 2X as likely to attend college • Cause  differentiation of resources in school/home  roots of inequality outside of the education system

  4. Student Assessment • Student performance based on conformity independent of ability: Natl Merit Scholarship Finalist Study (top 10%) Personality variables significant difference  teacher ratings: “citizenship/desire to achieve” • School reward docility/obedience penalizes creativity/ spontaneity • Not conducive to personal growth

  5. Education a Capitalist Enterprise • Education dictated by business (corporate) interests  notions of “efficient management” Teacher becomes a “simple” worker vs. Professional  student as object (tests) • Function of capitalist privilege and authority  i.e. business values and social relationships

  6. Conclusion • Schools  hostile to needs of personal development • Historical trajectory counter to notions equality of opportunity • Schools reproduce economic inequality via an alienated and stratified labor force • Capitalist system shaped Educational system

More Related