1 / 30

Michigan School Improvement Framework

Michigan School Improvement Framework. The Challenge…. Provide a comprehensive framework based on current research and best practice to serve as a road map to support continuous school improvement. The Challenge….

madge
Download Presentation

Michigan School Improvement Framework

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Michigan School ImprovementFramework

  2. The Challenge… • Provide a comprehensive framework based on current research and best practice to serve as a road map to support continuous school improvement.

  3. The Challenge… • Develop a framework that is based on research yet can be individualized to support the unique needs of each school.

  4. The Challenge… • Provide the educational community with a common school improvement dialogue and vocabulary.

  5. The Challenge… • Serve as a conceptual foundation to guide our thinking and action regarding school improvement.

  6. The Challenge… • Develop a set of standards through which our work is filtered and/or designed • Professional Development • Technical Support and Program Development • Grant Criteria • Accreditation – Performance Indicators

  7. Criteria for SI Framework • Build on current performance Indicators • Easy to Understand and User Friendly • Focused on Student Achievement • Measurable • Self-sufficient/Stand Alone

  8. Criteria continued… • Aligned - NCLB, Research, State/Federal Programs, NCA, PA 25, existing Performance Indicators • Address triple purpose: • feedback and guidance, • guideposts for our work, and • internal accountability

  9. Overview of Workgroup Process • Convened 60 educators (July ‘04) • Reviewed current EdYES! Performance Indicators • Reviewed the literature on school improvement • Cross-referenced research – search for common elements

  10. Overview of Workgroup Process • Developed a “School Improvement Framework” as a curriculum – strands, standards, benchmarks, criteria, rubrics • OSI develops framework; OEAA develops measurements • Cross reference Framework with Continuous Improvement Monitoring System (CIMS) • State Board Final Approval (Dec ’05)

  11. The Framework

  12. SI Framework Structure Strand– General Area of Focus Standard- Category of Influence within the Strand Benchmark - Specific Area of Performance within a Standard Key Characteristics – Examples of the Benchmark statements Evidence- Hard and/or soft data that provides evidence of Benchmark performance.

  13. Prioritize The SI Framework 5 Strands 12 Standards Prioritize 26 Benchmarks Key Characteristics

  14. The 5 Strands Strand I - TEACHING for LEARNING Strand II – LEADERSHIP Strand V - DATA & INFORMATION MANAGEMENT Strand III - PERSONNEL & PROFESSIONAL LEARNING Strand IV – SCHOOL & COMMUNITY RELATIONS

  15. Michigan School Improvement Framework

  16. Rubrics to Support Self Assessment

  17. Rubric Intent • Further defines and gives meaning to the School Improvement Framework. • Helps to visualize a “continuum of practice.” • Facilitates a conversation based upon a common language. • Promotes self-assessment of current level of implementation.

  18. Rubric Intent Cont. • Provides a description of the next level of success. • Describes exemplary practice. • Suggests sources of documentation to validate level of implementation. • Serve as a foundation for the replacement of the current EdYES performance indicators.

  19. The SI Rubrics 5 Strands 12 Standards 26 Benchmarks Key Characteristics

  20. Strand I, Standard 1, Benchmark B: Communicated (B3)

  21. Possible Data Sources

  22. Possible Data Sources

  23. Conversation Using the Framework and Rubric handouts, • Review Strand IV, Standard 2, Benchmark B – Engagement (page 12 of Framework) • Discuss the activities that you currently have in place that would address the Key Characteristics under 1-4 • Discuss how your school might rate itself on the rubric scope of practice for each of the Characteristic/Key Attributes listed ( pages 75-78 of rubrics)

  24. Documents Available Online • The School Improvement Framework, Rubrics, this PowerPoint, and other resources are available online at: www.mi.gov/osi or at www.mi.gov/schoolimprovement

  25. Contact Information • Dr. Yvonne Caamal Canul, Director Office of School Improvement Canuly@michigan.gov • Linda Forward, Supervisor Office of School Improvement ForwardL@michigan.gov • Linda Kent, Project Coordinator Office of School Improvement KentL2@michigan.gov

More Related