1 / 14

Clinical Case 1

Clinical Case 1. Krzysztof Narkiewicz Medical University of Gdańsk, Gdańsk, Poland. Relevant disclosure of interest: Consultant to Daiichi Sankyo and the Menarini group. Start of case – 1995. A 38-year old man, engineer, presenting with newly diagnosed hypertension

Download Presentation

Clinical Case 1

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Clinical Case 1 Krzysztof Narkiewicz Medical University of Gdańsk, Gdańsk, Poland Relevant disclosure of interest: Consultant to Daiichi Sankyo and the Menarini group

  2. Start of case – 1995 • A 38-year old man, engineer, presenting with newly diagnosed hypertension • High BP detected during medical exam for a new job • BP not measured for more than 10 years; his previous readings were “borderline” • The patient is asymptomatic • He smokes 15 cigarettes a day • Family history - hypertension and premature CHD deaths in both parents

  3. Physical examination and laboratory tests (1995) • BMI 27 kg/m2 • Waist 102 cm • HR 80bpm • BP 170/104 mmHg • ECG – normal, with HR 76 bpm • LDL 154 mg/dl • HDL 36 mg/dl • TG 249 mg/dl • Albuminuria 25 mg/24h • eGFR 86 ml/min

  4. Examinations and tests continued Echocardiography: • Borderline left ventricular hypertrophy with normal ejection fraction ABPM: • Mean day-time blood pressure of 151/95 mmHg with mean heart rate of 80 bpm • Average night-time blood pressure of 138/82 mmHg with mean heart rate of 61 bpm

  5. Treatment (1995) • ACE-Inhibitor • Diuretic • ASA 75–100 mg • Statin

  6. 1995–2006 • Variable BP control probably due to sub-optimal compliance (several missed visits) • Gained 10 kg, sedentary lifestyle, poor diet • Continued to smoke • Asymptomatic • Last visit December 2006

  7. January 2012 • First visit since 2006 • Difficult period (divorce, new job) • Discontinued all medications • Gained 10 more kg, lifestyle still sedentary, poor diet • Daytime somnolence, poor quality of sleep • Continues to smoke • TIA three days earlier with BP of 220/120mmHg

  8. Physical examination and laboratory tests (January 2012) • BMI 34 kg/m2 • Waist 114 cm • HR 80 bpm • BP 182/106 mmHg • ECG – LVH signs, with HR 90 bpm • LDL 164 mg/dl • HDL 34 mg/dl • TG 289 mg/dl • Fasting glycaemia 155 mg/dl • HbA1c 8.4% • Albuminuria 225 mg/24h • eGFR 49 ml/min

  9. Examinations and tests continued (January 2012) Echocardiography: • severe left ventricular hypertrophy (IVST – 14 mm) • diastolic dysfunction Carotid ultrasound: • IMT – 1.4 mm • Several plaques, but without critical stenosis PWV – 12.2 m/s

  10. Strategy • Blood pressure lowering (dual combination ARB + CCB) • Regression of target organ damage • Correction of metabolic disorders • Prevention of stroke and nephropathy • Screening for obstructive sleep apnea • Lifestyle changes

  11. March 2012 • Blood pressure still sub-optimal(office 156/94 mmHg) • therapy modified to triple combination • Aspirin added

  12. Treatment (June 2012) • ARB + diuretic + calcium channel blocker (as FDC) • ASA 75–100 mg • Statin (high dose) • Metformin • CPAP treatment

  13. Last visit (June 2012) • Perfect compliance • CPAP treatment • ABPM: • mean day-time blood pressure of 131/82 mmHg, with mean heart rate of 72 bpm • mean night-time blood pressure of 122/75 mmHg, with mean heart rate of 61 bpm

  14. Summary • Accidental detection of hypertension • Poor compliance despite good education • Totally non-compliant (untreated) for 6 years • Dramatic deterioration in health • significant organ damage • severe hypertension • Polytherapy required urgently • FDC important in reducing pill burden

More Related