1 / 24

JUST SAY NO Ethical Considerations of Patient Care in the Gray Zone

JUST SAY NO Ethical Considerations of Patient Care in the Gray Zone. AAOS ETHICS COMMITTEE Nancy M. Cummings, MD.

maddox
Download Presentation

JUST SAY NO Ethical Considerations of Patient Care in the Gray Zone

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. JUST SAY NOEthical Considerationsof Patient Care in the Gray Zone AAOS ETHICS COMMITTEE Nancy M. Cummings, MD

  2. “The ethical dimension of medicine is typically noticed only when a physician finds him or herself in a dilemma in which it is not obvious which of which of two treasured principles of professional ethics should be upheld and which should be sacrificed.”1

  3. Objectives • Explore the ethical challenges of disagreeing with a patient about his/her course of treatment • Define the obligation/role of the physician • Understand how gray areas can become black and white

  4. Introduction In today’s practice environment of shared decision making and information availability, patients present to the orthopaedist with their own expectations of what their work up or treatment course should include. Gone are the paternalistic days when Marcus Welby, MD, could come into the room and put his hand on the patient’s shoulder and tell the patient what should be done.

  5. There is a line that the physician needs to draw when the patient insists on an alternative course of treatment.

  6. Case Barbara Gail (BG) Decker is a 15-year-old soccer player who comes to your office midseason. She has sustained a twisting injury to her knee in the preseason. iStockphoto/Thinkstock

  7. Your exam indicates a torn ACL. Her parents insist that BG finish out the season in a brace and want no iStockphoto/Thinkstock further testing.

  8. What do you do now? Are you comfortable returning her to play? Do you want more information?

  9. You convince BG’s parents toobtain an MRI which shows no meniscal or articularcartilage injury. You get BG fitted for a brace, and she returns to play. iStockphoto/Thinkstock

  10. After the soccer season is over, BG and her parents return to your office and request allograft reconstruction of BG’s ACL so that she can play the second half of the basketball season. iStockphoto/Thinkstock

  11. You tell Mr. and Mrs. Decker and BG that you would prefer to use an autograft rather than an allograft. Either way she would not be able to play basketball this year.

  12. What do you do now?

  13. The MOON study data does not support the use of an allograft in this athlete.2

  14. BJ’s father says that they obtained a second opinion at Superstar Orthopaedics, Inc., across the street. The doctor said that if BG had an allograft reconstruction, she would not iStockphoto/Thinkstock miss the basketball season.

  15. Your office manager has brought to your attention that yourproductivity has dropped as of late.Erik Snyder/Lifesize/Thinkstock

  16. Mr. and Mrs. Decker want you to operate on their daughter because they know you are the Best!p.s. And theywant you to usean allograft. iStockphoto/Thinkstock

  17. What do you do now? • What do you tell them about your colleagues across the street?

  18. Or… • Do you change your treatment plan and operate on her using an allograft?

  19. The Devil is in the details……

  20. Summary The key to resolving this dilemma is to initiate and participate in a shared decision-making process. Avoid a paternalistic (Marcus Welby) approach and if that doesn’t work…..

  21. Do the right thing.

  22. References 1Capozzi J, Bronson W, Rhodes R: Moral Complexity. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2011 Aug 03;93(15):e88 1-3. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.K.00084. Spindler K, Parker R, Andrish J, et al, MOON Group: Prognosis and predictors of ACL reconstructions using the MOON cohort: A model for comparative effectiveness studies. J Orthop Res, Vol 31, Issue 1, pages 2-9, January 2013. Owens DK, Qaseem A, Chou R, Shekelle P: High-value, cost-conscious health care: Concepts for clinicians to evaluate the benefits, harms and costs for medical interventions. Ann Intern Med 2011;154(3):174-180.

  23. Elwyn G, Edwards A, Kinnersley P, Grol R: Shared decision making and the concept of equipoise: the competences of involving patients in healthcare choices. Br J Gen Pract, 2000, 50, 892-897. Rolita L, Spegman A, Tang X, Cronstein B: Greater number of narcotic analgesic prescriptions for osteoarthritis is associated with falls and fractures in elderly adults. J Am Geriatr Soc, 2013 Mar;61(3):335-40. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons: Code of Medical Ethics and Professionalism for Orthopaedic Surgeons, I.A., I.F. Adopted 1988, revised 2011.http://www/aaos.org/about/papers/ethics/code.asp

  24. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons: Shared Physician-Patient Responsibilities, Position Statement 1182. Adopted 2011. http://www.aaos.org/about/papers/position/1182.asp American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons: Standards of Professionalism on Providing Musculoskeletal Services to Patients, Mandatory Standard 1. Adopted April 18, 2005, amended April 24, 2008. http://www3.aaos.org/member/profcomp/provmuscserv.pdf

More Related